Minutes
Open Portion
Monday, 23 August 2021
AT 5:05 pm
Council Chamber, Town Hall
This meeting of the Council was conducted in accordance with a Notice issued by the Premier on 3 April 2020 under section 18 of the COVID-19 Disease Emergency (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2020.
|
Minutes (Open Portion) Council Meeting |
Page 3 |
|
23/8/2021 |
|
PRESENT, APOLOGIES AND LEAVE OF ABSENCE
3. Communication from the Chairman
4. Notification of Council Workshops
7. Consideration of Supplementary Items
8. Indications of Pecuniary and Conflicts of Interest
9. Council Acting as Planning Authority
9.2 34 Proctors Road, Dynnyrne - Partial Demolition
10. Short Stay Accommodation - Potential Planning Scheme Amendments
12. Monthly Planning Statistics - 1 July - 31 July 2021
13. Monthly Building Statistics - 1 July - 31 July 2021
Motions of which notice has been given
14. Parking Meters in North Hobart
15. Social Housing - Council Land
Finance and Governance Committee
16. 2020-21 Annual Plan - Final Report Period Ended 30 June 2021
Parks and Recreation Committee
17. Sandy Bay Rowing Club, Marieville Esplanade - Request for Extension of Lease Footprint
18. Clare Street Oval, New Town - Changeroom and Toilet Improvements
19. Elected Member Professional Development Plan - Councillor Jax Ewin
20. Closed Portion of the Meeting
Special Report – Chief Executive Officer
21. COVID-19 Update - Business Support and Engagement
|
Minutes (Open Portion) Council Meeting |
Page 5 |
|
23/08/2021 |
|
PRESENT:
The Lord Mayor Councillor A M Reynolds, the Deputy Lord Mayor Councillor H Burnet, Aldermen M Zucco, J R Briscoe, D C Thomas, Councillor W F Harvey, Alderman S Behrakis, Councillors M S C Dutta, J Ewin, Dr Z E Sherlock and W N S Coats.
APOLOGIES:
Nil.
LEAVE OF ABSENCE:
Alderman Dr P T Sexton.
Councillor Ewin joined the meeting at 5.13pm.
Alderman Behrakis left the meeting at 6.14pm, returning at 6.15pm.
Alderman Thomas left the meeting at 6.32pm, returning at 6.36pm.
Alderman Briscoe left the meeting at 6.54pm, returning at 6.56pm.
Councillor Ewin left the meeting at 6.59pm, returning at 7.04pm and was not present for the first vote in item 14.
Alderman Zucco retired from the meeting at 8.34pm and was not present for items 19 to 21 inclusive.
The Chairman reports that she has perused the minutes of the meeting of the Open Portion of the Council meeting held on Monday, 9 August 2021, finds them to be a true record and recommends that they be taken as read and signed as a correct record.
Sherlock That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
MOTION CARRIED
VOTING RECORD
The minutes were signed. |
Are there any items, which the meeting believes, should be transferred from this agenda to the closed agenda or from the closed agenda to the open agenda, in accordance with the procedures allowed under Section 15 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015?
No items were transferred.
|
The Lord Mayor advised the Chamber that a meeting of the Greater Hobart Committee was during the week of 16 August 2021.
She reported this Committee was established by the Greater Hobart Act 2019 as part of facilitating engagement between the four metro Councils and the State Government.
Memberships includes the four Greater Hobart Mayors, Minister Ferguson and the Deputy Premier Rockliff.
Items covered at the meeting were reviewing feedback on the shared vision for Greater Hobart; progress in developing a MetroPlan and the shared work happening in waste.
A shared Vision for Greater Hobart
A vision seeking to guide growth and development in Greater Hobart to 2050 was approved. The goal of the vision is a first step for the four local government areas to see themselves more as one City. The draft vision was circulated to Elected Members in March 2021.
The five-week long consultation process indicated broad support for the draft Vision, and so the committee resolved to adopt the shared vision at our meeting.
Development of a MetroPlan
The MetroPlan to deliver the Vision through better integration of strategic land use and infrastructure planning across Greater Hobart continues to be a priority for the Committee. Work on several strategies and an implementation plan were being progressed collaboratively.
There is a briefing for elected members on the draft Metro Plan next Tuesday 31 August 2021.
|
|
The Lord Mayor reported that she and the CEO met with Minister Roger Jaensch the week of 16 August to talk about:
· The Local Government reform process. · The Code of Conduct Review and Council’s own issues resolution processes. · Heritage matters.
The Local Government reform process is still underway, with the Terms of Reference for the review currently being drafted.
Mr Jaensch was interested and supportive of the City of Hobart’s process for issue resolution. He was also supportive of Council’s approach in terms of short stay accommodation as it aligns with the approach outlined the State Government’s response to the Legislative Council Inquiry into short-stay accommodation.
As the recently-appointed Minister for Heritage, he has indicated a willingness to hear more about Heritage matters and was pleased to learn about Council’s recently advertised heritage grants.
|
|
The Lord Mayor advised the Chamber that as part of the City’s commitment to being a Refugee Welcome Zone that the City of Hobart is supporting the urgent advocacy campaign of the Refugee Council of Australia on the Afghanistan crisis.
The City has joined as a signatory to a letter to all Federal Parliamentarians outlining the steps the Australian Government can take to support the people of Afghanistan.
|
In accordance with the requirements of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015, the Chief Executive Officer reports that no Council workshops have been conducted since the last ordinary meeting of the Council.
Regulation 31 Local Government (Meeting
Procedures) Regulations 2015.
File Ref: 16/119-001
5.1 Public Questions
No questions were received.
5.2 Responses to Public Questions Taken On Notice
Dutta
That the following responses to public questions taken on notice, be received and noted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
VOTING RECORD
|
Meeting date: 21 June 2021 |
Raised by: Ms Isla MacGregor |
Topic: William Crowther reinterpretation statue |
Question:
To Lord Mayor Anna Reynolds: I am conducting research on the methods used to discredit and attack dissidents and whistle-blowers on contemporary human rights issues in Tasmania.
I was recently alerted to a letter you wrote, published on a Facebook page in response to some information supplied to you by Scott Seymour. You confirmed agreement with his suggestion that the statements made on the plaque on the Crowther statue were factually incorrect.
Can you please explain what measures you took to ensure that information presented to the public in the name of “truth telling” was in fact true, if so what steps were taken, who were consulted, and what actions have been taken to publicly “correct the record” now the plaque statements have been demonstrated to be false?
Response:
The City of Hobart commissioned a series of four temporary public art commissions, by local arts practitioners, each offering a response to the statue of William Crowther in Franklin Square.
The four works present diverse perspectives and aim to acknowledge, question, provoke discussion or increase awareness about the story of Crowther and his treatment of the body of well-known Aboriginal leader William Lanne, after his death in the 1860s.
Members of the Tasmanian Aboriginal community have expressed their discomfort with the existence of the William Crowther statue during previous consultations, and this project is in response for their desire for something to be done to recognise the story of what happened to William Lanne.
The City’s Aboriginal Commitment and Action Plan, sets out a commitment to visibility and truth telling across the city, with an action under this commitment being:
· Undertake an interpretation project to tell the layered story of Crowther in Franklin Square. (Action 6)
This project responds directly to this commitment and action and is intended to allow multiple voices to comment on and discuss this contested elements within the city.
I have read the Stefan Petrow article, The Last Man: The mutilation of William Lanne in 1869 and its aftermath and asked for Council officers to ensure that this was in the package of briefing materials to be provided for all the artists.
The Petrow record shows that in addition to Crowther there were a range of people and other medical practitioners also involved in the removal of Lanne’s other body parts.
This installation is one artist’s interpretation of the story and is not necessarily trying to tell a ‘formal history’. Through an artistic interpretation it aims provides some balance to the story. But these installations are not meant to be read as a full, formal and official record of all the events. Some people indeed argue that the original statue and description on it is also not a ‘complete story’ of William Crowther’s life.
Meeting date: 5 July 2021 |
Raised by: Mr Brian Corr |
Topic: Code of Conduct Legal Expenses |
Question:
What were the costs of:
1. Legal advice before, during, and after, the Panel's decision, given to Alderman Zucco, and, if any, to the City of Hobart?
2. The Code of Conduct Panel?
3. Time spent on the matter by City of Hobart staff?
4. Any other cost(s) not included in 1 to 3?
What amount was paid by each of the following:
1. City of Hobart i.e. ratepayers?
2. Insurance policies or the like?
3. Alderman Zucco himself?
4. Any others not included in 1 to 3?
Response:
In accordance with the Elected Member Development and Support Policy (“the Policy”) and in accordance with Clause 1(2)(b) of Schedule 5 of the Local Government Act 1993 (“the Act”), an elected member can be reimbursed their reasonable legal expenses in a circumstance where they are defending or responding to a claim, action or demand made by a third party against the elected member.
Alderman Zucco sought reimbursement of legal expenses to defend the Code of Conduct complaints brought against him totalling $30,500 excluding GST.
In accordance with the Policy, officers obtained third party legal advice in relation to whether the reimbursement sought met the criteria of the Policy. The cost of this advice was in the order of $3,031.60 including GST.
The City of Hobart made a claim through its insurance provider which resulted in the City being reimbursed a total of $20,968.33 excluding GST.
The cost of the Code of Conduct Panel’s determination in relation to the two complaints were $2,555.85 and $10,282.25 respectively.
It is not possible to accurately quantify the time spent on this matter by Council officers however, it would include the time required to execute the statutory requirements associated with a code of conduct complaint being made, time associated with obtaining third party legal advice, processing of the reimbursement claim, lodgement of an insurance claim and preparing a response to your questions.
Lastly, I am unable to comment on any additional personal costs Alderman Zucco may have incurred through this process, I am only aware of those he sought reimbursement for.
No petitions were received.
Ref: Part 2, Regulation 8(6) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015.
That the Council resolve to deal with any supplementary items not appearing on the agenda, as reported by the Chief Executive Officer in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015.
Dutta That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
VOTING RECORD
|
Ref: Part 2, Regulation 8(7) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015.
Members of the Committee are requested to indicate where they may have any pecuniary or conflicts of interest in respect to any matter appearing on the agenda, or any supplementary item to the agenda, which the Committee has resolved to deal with.
No interest was indicated.
In accordance with the provisions of Part 2 Regulation 25 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015, the intention of the Council to act as a planning authority pursuant to the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993 is to be noted.
In accordance with Regulation 25, the Council will act as a planning authority in respect to those matters appearing under this heading on the agenda, inclusive of any supplementary items.
The Council is reminded that in order to comply with Regulation 25(2), the Chief Executive Officer is to ensure that the reasons for a decision by a Council or Council Committee acting as a planning authority are recorded in the minutes.
9.1 404 Park Street, New Town - Partial Demolition, Alterations, Extension and Three Multiple Dwellings (One Existing, Two New) PLN-21-315 - File Ref: F21/79118 Ref: Open CPC 7.2.1, 16/08/2021 Application Expiry Date: 27 August 2021 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
That pursuant to the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015, the Council approve the application for partial demolition, alterations, extension, and three multiple dwellings (one existing, two new) at 404 Park Street, New Town TAS 7008, for the reasons outlined in the officer’s report marked as attachment A to item 7.2.1 of the Open City Planning Committee agenda of 16 August 2021, and a permit containing the following conditions be issued:
GEN
The use and/or development must be substantially in accordance with the documents and drawings that comprise Partial Demolition, Alterations, Extension, and Three Multiple Dwellings (One Existing, Two New) at 404 PARK STREET NEW TOWN TAS 7008 Final Planning Documents except where modified below.
Reason for condition
To clarify the scope of the permit.
TW
The use and/or development must comply with the requirements of TasWater as detailed in the form Submission to Planning Authority Notice, Reference No. TWDA 2021/00752HCC dated 18/05/2021 as attached to the permit.
Reason for condition
To clarify the scope of the permit.
ENG sw1
All stormwater from the proposed development (including but not limited to: roofed areas, ag drains, and impervious surfaces such as driveways and paved areas) must be drained to the Council’s stormwater infrastructure prior to first occupation or commencement of use (whichever occurs first).
Reason for condition
To ensure that stormwater from the site will be discharged to a suitable Council approved outlet.
SW 7
Prior to occupancy or the commencement of the use (whichever occurs first), any new stormwater connection must be constructed and existing redundant connection(s) be abandoned and sealed at the owner’s expense.
Prior to the issuing of any approval under the Building Act 2016 or commencement of works (whichever occurs first), detailed engineering drawings must be submitted and approved. The detailed engineering drawings must include:
1. the
location of the proposed connections and all existing connections; 2. the size and design
of the connection such that it is appropriate to safely service the development and
in general accordance with Council's departures from the LGAT Tasmanian Standard
Drawings, available from here; 3. longsections of the proposed connection clearly showing relative levels; clearances from any nearby services,
poles or crossover wings; cover; size; material and delineation of public and
private infrastructure; 4. connections which are freeflowing gravity driven;
All work required by this condition must be undertaken in accordance with the approved detailed engineering drawings. The approved stormwater connection documents must be included in your plumbing permit application document set and listed in accompanying forms.
Advice: any proposed kerb connection must point downstream (ie with the flow) and be clear of the crossover wings.
SW 9
Prior to occupancy or the commencement of the approved use (whichever occurs first), stormwater detention for the site must be installed.
A stormwater management report and design must be submitted and approved as a Condition Endorsement, prior to the issue of any approval under the Building Act 2016 or the commencement of work on the site (whichever occurs first). The stormwater management report and design must be prepared by a suitably qualified engineer and must:
1. include
detailed design and
supporting calculations of
the detention tank showing: 1. detention tank sizing
such that there is no increase in flows fromthe
developed site up to 5% AEP event to the kerb and gutter; 2. the layout
and longsection showing
the inlet, outlet, tank
connections, orifice
size, overflow mechanism and invert level; 3. the discharge rates and
emptying times; and 4. all assumptions must be clearly stated;
2. include a supporting maintenance plan, which specifies the required maintenance measures to check and ensure the ongoing effective operation of all systems, such as: inspection frequency; cleanout procedures; descriptions and diagrams of how the installed systems operate; details of the life of assets and replacement requirements.
All work required by this condition must be undertaken and maintained in accordance with the approved stormwater management report and design.
Advice: This condition requires further information to be submitted as a Condition Endorsement. Refer to the Condition Endorsement advice at the end of this permit.
ENG 3a
The access driveway and parking module (parking spaces, aisles and manoeuvring areas) must be designed and constructed in accordance with Australian Standard AS/NZS2890.1:2004 (including the requirement for vehicle safety barriers where required), or a Council approved alternate design certified by a suitably qualified engineer to provide a safe and efficient access, and enable safe, easy and efficient use.
Advice: It is advised that designers consider the detailed design of the access and parking module prior to finalising the Finished Floor Level (FFL) of the parking spaces (especially if located within a garage incorporated into the dwelling), as failure to do so may result in difficulty complying with this condition.
Reason for condition
To ensure the safety of users of the access and parking module, and compliance with the relevant Australian Standard.
ENG 3c
The access driveway and parking module (parking spaces, aisles and manoeuvring areas) must be constructed in accordance with the Oramatis Studio documentation received by the Council on the 21st June 2021.
Reason for condition
To ensure the safety of users of the access and parking module, and compliance with the relevant Australian Standard.
ENG 4
The access driveway and parking module (car parking spaces, aisles and manoeuvring area) approved by this permit must be constructed to a sealed standard (spray seal, asphalt, concrete, pavers or equivalent Council approved) and surface drained to the Council's stormwater infrastructure prior to the commencement of use.
Reason for condition
To ensure the safety of users of the access driveway and parking module, and that it does not detract from the amenity of users, adjoining occupiers or the environment by preventing dust, mud and sediment transport.
ENG 5 The number of car parking spaces approved to be used on the site is four (4).
Parking space "UNIT 2 P2" must be delineated by means of white or yellow lines 80mm to 100mm wide in accordance with Australian Standards AS/NZS 2890.1 2004, prior to first occupation of either Unit 1 or Unit 2.
Reason for condition
To ensure the provision of parking for the use is safe and efficient.
ENG 1
Any damage to council infrastructure resulting from the implementation of this permit, must, at the discretion of the Council:
1. Be met by the owner
by way of reimbursement (cost of repair and
reinstatement to be
paid by the
owner to the
Council); or 2. Be repaired and reinstated by the owner to the satisfaction of the Council.
A photographic record of the Council's infrastructure adjacent to the subject site must be provided to the Council prior to any commencement of works.
A photographic record of the Council’s infrastructure (e.g. existing property service connection points, roads, buildings, stormwater, footpaths, driveway crossovers and nature strips, including if any, preexisting damage) will be relied upon to establish the extent of damage caused to the Council’s infrastructure during construction. In the event that the owner/developer fails to provide to the Council a photographic record of the Council’s infrastructure, then any damage to the Council's infrastructure found on completion of works will be deemed to be the responsibility of the owner.
Reason for condition
To ensure that any of the Council's infrastructure and/or siterelated service connections affected by the proposal will be altered and/or reinstated at the owner’s full cost.
ENV 1
Sediment and erosion control measures sufficient to prevent sediment from leaving the site must be installed prior to any disturbance of the site, and maintained until all areas of disturbance have been stabilized or revegetated.
Advice: For further guidance in preparing a Soil and Water Management Plan – in accordance with Fact sheet 3 Derwent Estuary Program click here.
Reason for condition
To avoid the sedimentation of roads, drains, natural watercourses, Council land that could be caused by erosion and runoff from the development, and to comply with relevant State legislation.
OPS 3 Pervious areas of the driveway area must be landscaped prior to occupancy.
A landscaping plan prepared by a suitably qualified person detailing the planting of areas of pervious surfaces within the driveway area must be submitted and approved as a Condition Endorsement, prior to the issue of any approval under the Building Act 2016.
The Landscaping Plan must include:
1. The species and size at planting of shrubs, trees and ground covers.
2. The location of driveways including vehicle swept paths,
pedestrian footpaths and any proposed or existing underground
infrastructure 3. watering plan and ongoing arrangements to ensure the plants maintain a healthy state.
All landscaping must be planted and installed in accordance with the approved Landscaping Plan. Prior to occupancy, the person who prepared the Landscapng Plan (or another suitably qualified person), must provide written confirmation that the landscaping has been planted and installed in accordance with the approved Landscaping Plan.
The landscaping must be maintained and if any landscaping is lost, it must be replanted within 30 days of it being lost.
Advice: This condition requires further information to be submitted as a Condition Endorsement. Refer to the Condition Endorsement advice at the end of this permit.
Reason for condition
To ensure that the proposal provides a high standard of residential amenity and optimal environmental performance.
ADVICE
The applicant is encouraged to landscape other parts of the site to minimise visual bulk of the two new dwellings.
ADVICE
The following advice is provided to you to assist in the implementation of the planning permit that has been issued subject to the conditions above. The advice is not exhaustive and you must inform yourself of any other legislation, bylaws, regulations, codes or standards that will apply to your development under which you may need to obtain an approval. Visit the Council's website for further information.
Prior to any commencement of work on the site or commencement of use the following additional permits/approval may be required from the Hobart City Council.
CONDITION ENDORSEMENT
If any condition requires that further documents are submitted and approved, you will need to submit the relevant documentation to satisfy the condition via the Condition Endorsement Submission on Council's online services eplanning portal. Detailed instructions can be found here.
A fee of 2% of the value of the works for new public assets (stormwater infrastructure, roads and related assets) will apply for the condition endorsement applicationOnce approved, the Council will respond to you via email that the condition has been endorsed (satisfied).
Where building approval is also required, it is recommended that documentation for condition endorsement be submitted well before submitting documentation for building approval. Failure to address condition endorsement requirements prior to submitting for building approval may result in unexpected delays.
BUILDING PERMIT
You may need building approval in accordance with the Building Act 2016. Click here for more information.
This is a Discretionary Planning Permit issued in accordance with section 57 of the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993.
PLUMBING PERMIT
You may need plumbing approval in accordance with the Building Act 2016, Building Regulations 2016 and the National Construction Code. Click here for more information.
OCCUPATION OF THE PUBLIC HIGHWAY
You may require a permit for the occupation of the public highway for construction or special event (e.g. placement of skip bin, scissor lift etc). Click here for more information.
BUILDING OVER AN EASEMENT
In order to build over the service easement, you will require the written consent of the person on whose behalf the easement was created, in accordance with section 74 of the Building Act 2016.
PLANNING
In the interests of privacy, the applicant is strongly encouraged to have the side and rear fencing be to a height of 2.1m, except within 4.5m of the frontage.
In the interests of privacy, the applicant is strongly encouraged to have the upstairs side bedroom windows and stair landing window frosted.
WASTE DISPOSAL
It is recommended that the developer liaise with the Council’s Cleansing and Solid Waste Unit regarding reducing, reusing and recycling materials associated with demolition on the site to minimise solid waste being directed to landfill.
Further information regarding waste disposal can also be found on the Council’s website.
FEES AND CHARGES
Click here for information on the Council's fees and charges.
DIAL BEFORE YOU DIG
Click here for dial before you dig information |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Behrakis That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
9.2 34 Proctors Road, Dynnyrne - Partial Demolition File Ref: F21/83776 Ref: Special Open CPC 3.1.1, 23/08/2021 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
That pursuant to the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015, the Council refuse the application for partial demolition at 34 Proctors Road, Dynnyrne 7005 for the following reason:
1. The proposal does not meet the acceptable solution or the performance criterion with respect to clause E13.8.1 A1 and P1 of the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015 because a chimney would be demolished and that chimney is significant and makes a contribution to the historic cultural heritage significance of the precinct. The applicant has not articulated environmental, social economic or safety reasons of greater values to the community than the chimney. A prudent and feasible alternative would have been to retain the chimney. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Harvey That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION LOST VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Zucco
That pursuant to the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015, the Council approve the application for partial demolition at 34 Proctors Road, Dynnyrne, TAS 7005 for the reason that the proposal satisfies the requirements of the scheme including E13.8.1 P1, subject to the following condition:
GEN
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
COUNCIL RESOLUTION: |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
That pursuant to the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015, the Council approve the application for partial demolition at 34 Proctors Road, Dynnyrne, TAS 7005 for the reason that the proposal satisfies the requirements of the scheme including E13.8.1 P1, subject to the following condition:
GEN
|
10. Short Stay Accommodation - Potential Planning Scheme Amendments File Ref: F21/17902 Ref: Open CPC 8.1, 16/08/2021 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That: 1. Council pursue inserting one or more specific area plans into the Hobart Local Provisions Schedule that prohibit entire home short stay accommodation use (excluding for ‘secondary residences’); 2. Council advocate to the Minister for Planning to issue a planning directive that immediately prohibits new permits for entire home short stay accommodation within the Hobart Local Government Area; 3. Council advocate for statewide regulations, similar to those in New South Wales, that enable councils to make decisions about properties within their local government area; and 4. Council advocate to the Tasmanian Government to form a ‘Housing Supply Forecasting Council’ in line with Recommendation 5 of the report Regulating Short-Stay Accommodation in Tasmania: Issues to consider and options for reform.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Burnet Ewin That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Zucco
That Alderman Zucco be granted and additional one minute to address the meeting.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BEHRAKIS
That Alderman Behrakis be granted and additional one minute to address the meeting.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As a result of debate, the Lord Mayor decided the to put the vote for clauses 1 to 4 separately. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED
VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
COUNCIL RESOLUTION: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That: 1. Council pursue inserting one or more specific area plans into the Hobart Local Provisions Schedule that prohibit entire home short stay accommodation use (excluding for ‘secondary residences’); 2. Council advocate to the Minister for Planning to issue a planning directive that immediately prohibits new permits for entire home short stay accommodation within the Hobart Local Government Area; 3. Council advocate for statewide regulations, similar to those in New South Wales, that enable councils to make decisions about properties within their local government area; and 4. Council advocate to the Tasmanian Government to form a ‘Housing Supply Forecasting Council’ in line with Recommendation 5 of the report Regulating Short-Stay Accommodation in Tasmania: Issues to consider and options for reform.
|
File Ref: F20/78941; 16/243 Ref: Open CPC 8.2, 16/08/2021 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
That: 1. The Council continue to focus its regulatory effort on higher risk food activities including food production, processing and sales. 2. Any future complaints received regarding food delivery vehicles are investigated within operational protocols and legislated powers. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sherlock That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
12. Monthly Planning Statistics - 1 July - 31 July 2021 File Ref: F21/77580 Ref: Open CPC 8.3, 16/08/2021 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That the planning statistical report of the Director City Planning be received and noted:
During the period 1 July 2021 to 31 July 2021, 61 permits were issued to the value of $10,800,580 which included:
(i) 5 new single dwellings to the value of $1,510,000;
(ii) 2 multiple dwellings to the value of $580,000;
(iii) 27 extensions/alterations to dwellings to the value of $4,229,000;
(iv) 7 extensions/alterations to commercial properties to the value of 4,209,980;
(v) 1 major project;
(a) 180 Harrington Street, Hobart - Partial Demolition, Alterations and Extension - $4,000,000;
During the period 1 July 2020 to 31 July 2020, 67 permits were issued to the value of $20,301,927 which included:
(i) 7 new single dwellings to the value of $3,376,000;
(ii) 3 multiple dwellings to the value of $900,000;
(iii) 29 extensions/alterations to dwellings to the value of $12,859,745;
(iv) 4 extensions/alterations to commercial properties to the value of $720,000;
(v) 2 major projects:
(a) 11 Swan Street, North Hobart - Partial Demolition, Alterations, Extension, Landscaping (including Tree Removal), and Car Parking - $8,203,000; (b) 10 Evans Street, Hobart - Land Decontamination - $2,500,000;
In the twelve months ending July 2021, 833 permits were issued to the value of $321,235,282; and
In the twelve months ending July 2020, 849 permits were issued to the value of $293,684,850
# This report includes permits issued, exempt and no permit required decisions. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sherlock That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED
VOTING RECORD
|
13. Monthly Building Statistics - 1 July - 31 July 2021 File Ref: F21/77604 Ref: Open CPC 8.4, 16/08/2021 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That the building statistical report of the Director City Planning be received and noted:
During the period 1 July 2021 to 31 July 2021, 50 permits were issued to the value of $47,662,084 which included:
(i) 34 for extensions/alterations to dwellings to the value of $5,595,385;
(ii) 4 new dwellings to the value of $1,365,000;
(iii) 75 new multiple dwellings to the value of $32,437,499; and
(iv) 4 major projects:
(a) 62 Patrick Street, Hobart - Multiple New Dwellings X 68 Apartments - $29,195,499; (b) 26 Lower Jordan Hill Road, West Hobart - Multiple New Dwellings X 5 - $3,212,000; (c) 410 Sandy Bay Road, Sandy Bay - Commercial Internal Alterations - $2,800,000; (d) 33 Argyle Street - Hobart - Commercial Internal Alterations - $2,348,000;
During the period 1 July 2020 to 31 July 2020, 57 permits were issued to the value of $18,938,311 which included:
(i) 16 for extensions/alterations to dwellings to the value of $3,050,575;
(ii) 20 new dwellings to the value of $7,395,555;
(iii) 2 new multiple dwellings to the value of $900,000; and
(iv) 3 major projects:
(a) 15 Gourlay Street, West Hobart - Commercial Extension - $4,000,000; (b) 30 Bathurst Street. Hobart - Commercial Internal Alterations - $2,000,000; (c) 6 Midwood Street, New Town - New Commercial Buildings and Associated Civil Works, Stage 1 - $1,069,160;
In the twelve months ending July 2021, 655 permits were issued to the value of $227,681,603; and
In the twelve months ending July 2020, 615 permits were issued to the value of $226,585,115 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sherlock That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
IN ACCORDANCE WITH REGULATION 16(5) OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT (MEETING PROCEDURES) REGULATIONS 2015
14. Parking Meters in North Hobart File Ref: F21/81517 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Alderman Zucco Motion “That the Hobart City Council immediately suspend the use of parking meters in North Hobart. That the CEO be provided delegated Authority to consult with traders as per their parking requirements for the business strip of North Hobart and implement their needs as a matter of urgency. That once any new parking arraignments are implemented the Hobart City Council embark on a marketing program with traders to rejuvenate business in the area with a report to the relevant committee as per costs and implementation. That the Hobart City Council urgently write and further lobby the Minister for transport to consult with the Hobart City Council and Traders with the intent to implement Legislation to allow Local Government to administer Uber Eats and similar food delivery services.”
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rationale:
“It is obvious that the current Covid 19 crises is affecting businesses and the general public in Hobart Tasmania with North Hobart in the mix. The implementation of Parking meters in North Hobart has decimated a vast number of businesses in North Hobart with some losing around $5000 per week this is not sustainable and is causing Mental Stress for a vast number of family run small businesses in North Hobart.
How would any elected members or Senior HCC management feel if they were subjected to such losses.
Traders have expressed their concerns with a recent Petition in particular, affected traders were not consulted.
I have personally spoken to a vast number of traders who are frustrated and concerned that they were not consulted and the extent of their business losses over the past months.
The HCC is causing unnecessary loss of trade and mentally distressing traders who are already suffering due to covid.
The recent changes to the signs that involved a “Line” and the word “only” added is a another knee jerk reaction to a very serious issues that the HCC MUST start listening to those adversely affected first and foremost: The TRADERS
North Hobart is in a similar position as Yarraville in Victoria where meters were introduced and created similar issues as what we see in North Hobart. The Council involved removed meters after it was found that it impacted business dramatically.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-12-04/yarraville-paid-parking-put-on-hold-by-council/7003128
The Council has an obligation to immediately suspend and possibly remove this unwanted impost on traders and furthermore NO OTHER small business prescient is being subjected to this type of big brother policy. There are NO Meters in South Hobart, Sandy Bay, Lower Sandy Bay, Lenah Valley or New Town. This is unjust.
The Solution to Uber eats and similar food delivery services are possible with changes to Legislation to allow Local Councils to regulate these services which I consider no different to regulating food trucks.
It’s not want we can do as action is possible so the question should be lets allow the CEO to FULLY consult with ALL traders (owners) and find solutions rather than impose restrictions that cause more harm than benefit.
The First step is to suspend and most likely remove these unwanted meters and work with those affected to move forward with solutions.”
The Chief Executive Officer reports:
The Council at its meeting on 9 August 2021 received a petition from Ms Lisa Martin of Winnings Newsagency, North Hobart. Council’s Executive Leadership Team have commenced an URGENT review of the issues raised in the petition; together with the preparation of an Action Plan for Council consideration at an upcoming meeting to address a number of the economic impacts affecting businesses in North Hobart; in addition to a number of tangible projects focussed on business support, street and amenity improvements.
It is important to note that the operational parking policy changes unanimously adopted by Council on 23rd November 2020 were developed to address multiple interconnected issues within precincts. Without a comprehensive analysis (currently underway as part of the response to addressing the issues raised in the petition) and by removing a single component; unintended detrimental outcomes could result; including the return of parking congestion, inadequate parking availability and issues around social food delivery vehicles. It is therefore considered appropriate to receive a comprehensive report from Council Officers on this matter prior to Council making a penultimate decision.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thomas
That the motion be adopted with the first sentence replaced with the following:
The Hobart City Council temporarily suspend the use of parking meters in North Hobart until such time as the CEO completes a comprehensive analysis into parking issues in North Hobart. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Briscoe
Alderman Zucco be granted a further two minutes to address the meeting.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sherlock
That Alderman Behrakis be granted an additional one minute to address the meeting.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION LOST VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Burnet
That Council wait until the CEO has reported back to the Council in response to the petition received from North Hobart traders, estimated to be in three weeks’ time, before making any decision in regards to the parking meters in North Hobart.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
COUNCIL RESOLUTION: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That Council wait until the CEO has reported back to the Council in response to the petition received from North Hobart traders, estimated to be in three weeks’ time, before making any decision in regards to the parking meters in North Hobart.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
a Consultation
undertaken by Ms Lisa Martin of Winnings Newsagents |
16. 2020-21 Annual Plan - Final Report File Ref: F21/76961 Ref: Open FGC 6.1, 17/08/2021 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That the Council endorse the Annual Plan Final report for the period ending 30 June 2021, marked as Attachment A to item 6.1 of the Finance and Governance Committee meeting of 17 August 2021. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thomas That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED
VOTING RECORD
|
17. Sandy Bay Rowing Club, Marieville Esplanade - Request for Extension of Lease Footprint File Ref: F21/60198 Ref: Open PRC 6.1, 12/08/2021 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That: 1. An extension of lease footprint to the Sandy Bay Rowing Club over a section of land outside of its premises at Marieville Esplanade, Battery Point (marked as Attachment A to item 6.1 of the Open Parks and Recreation Committee agenda of 12 August 2021), be approved, subject to no objections being received during the statutory community engagement process required under Sections 178 and 179 of the Local Government Act 1993.
(i) Should any objections be received during the community engagement period, a further report will be provided to the Council. 2. The extended lease footprint area be added to the existing lease which, if all lease options are pursued, expires in 2030 under the same terms and conditions as the current lease. 3. The Chief Executive Officer be authorised to finalise the terms and conditions of the lease. 4. In accordance with the Council Policy ‘Grants and Benefits Disclosure’ the benefit recognised to the Sandy Bay Rowing Club by way of reduced rental as part of the amended lease be disclosed in the City’s Annual Report. 5. The Club submit a landscaping plan, including furniture design, to the satisfaction of the Director City Amenity, prior to any on-ground improvements being undertaken by the Club. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EWIN That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
18. Clare Street Oval, New Town - Changeroom and Toilet Improvements File Ref: F21/75087 Ref: Open PRC 6.2, 12/08/2021 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That: 1. The Council endorse the proposal to significantly upgrade and enhance the public toilet and changerooms facilities at Clare Street Oval, New Town, as detailed in the report of 6 August 2021 marked as item 6.2 of the Open Parks and Recreation Committee agenda of 12 August 2021. (i) The Council note the City’s current asset replacement budget allocation of $900,000, together with State Government’s ‘Levelling the Playing Field’ grant funding of $450,000 for the improvement works. 2. The CEO be delegated authority to secure all statutory permits for the development to proceed. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sherlock That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED
VOTING RECORD
|
19. Elected Member Professional Development Plan - Councillor Jax Ewin File Ref: F21/82179 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Burnet Sherlock
That the recommendation contained in the Special Report of the Lord Mayor, marked as item 19 of the Open Council Agenda of 23 August 2021, be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
COUNCIL RESOLUTION: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That the professional development plan for Councillor Jax Ewin, as attached to the Open Council Agenda of 23 August 2021, be received and noted.
|
Supplementary Item 21 was then taken.
That the Council resolve by absolute majority that the meeting be closed to the public pursuant to regulation 15(1) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015 because the items included on the closed agenda contain the following matters:
· Minutes of a Closed meeting · Leave of absence · Matter relating to legal action · Personal hardship of ratepayers
The following items were discussed:-
Item No. 1 Minutes of the last meeting of the Closed Portion of the Council Meeting Item No. 2 Communication from the Chairman Item No. 3 Leave of Absence Item No. 4 Consideration of supplementary Items to the agenda Item No. 5 Indications of pecuniary and conflicts of interest Item No. 6 Risk and Audit Panel Minutes - 8 June 2021 LG(MP)R 15(2)(g) Item No. 7.1 PLN-20-827 - 26 Fitzroy Place and 2 Montgomery Court Sandy Bay - partial demolition, extension and alterations to visitor accommodation, car parking and subdivision (boundary adjustment) - Appeal - Mediation LG(MP)R 15(4)(a) Item No. 8 Outstanding Rates as at 30 June 2021 LG(MP)R 15(2)(g) and (j) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Sherlock That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
MOTION CARRIED BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY VOTING RECORD
|
21. COVID-19 Update - Business Support and Engagement File Ref: F21/82756 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
DUTTA
That the recommendation contained in the Special Report of the Chief Executive Officer, marked as supplementary item 21 of the Open Council Agenda of 23 August 2021, be adopted.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
COUNCIL RESOLUTION: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1. The Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to develop a local economic package to support business who continue to be impacted by border closures. 2. The local economic package, include, but not be limited to, the following components: (a) One-on-one advice and support through a new Business Concierge Service (b) Provision of rent relief in Council-owned and managed buildings; (c) Suspend fees for occupation licences for outdoor dining for affected businesses; (d) Reduce registration fees for food businesses; (e) Facilitate business support round tables focusing on impacted industries such as tourism and hospitality and the creative industries; (f) Partner with the State Government to provide one-off grants to support small businesses not eligible for the most recent round of State and Federal Government grants; (g) Review parking arrangements across the city to support business affected by border restrictions; (h) Continue to explore the feasibility of a weekend ferry service from Bellerive to Hobart to support Tasmania’s Own Market and our waterfront hospitality and retail sector; (i) Commence a comprehensive return to the Hobart CBD campaign and work with key industry leaders to encourage their staff to return to our CBD offices to ensure support for city traders. 3. The Council approve an increased budget allocation of up $100,000, in addition to the existing $56,000, for additional grants to assist impacted business. The program to be funded from the major events sponsorship budget. |
Item 20 was then taken.
The Chairman adjourned the meeting at 7.58pm for a comfort break.
The meeting was reconvened at 8.09pm.
Item 15 was then taken.
There being no further business the Open portion of the meeting closed at 8.47pm
TAKEN AS READ AND SIGNED AS A CORRECT RECORD
THIS
6th DAY OF September 2021.
CHAIRMAN