HCC Coat of Arms.jpg
City of hobart

AGENDA

City Planning Committee Meeting

 

Open Portion

 

Monday, 17 February 2020

 

at 5:00 pm

Lady Osborne Room, Town Hall

 

SUPPLEMENTARY ITEMS

ORDER OF BUSINESS

Committee Acting as Planning Authority. 4

Applications under the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015

13       179-191 Murray Street, Hobart, 62 Patrick Street, Hobart Adjacent Road Reserve - Demolition and New Building for General Retail and Hire, Bulky Goods Sales and 68 Multiple Dwellings. 5

14       52 View Street, Sandy Bay - Alterations. 128

15       26 York Street, Sandy Bay - Partial Demolition, Alterations, Retaining Wall, Car Parking and Front Fencing. 157

Reports

16       Urban Design Advisory Panel - Terms of Reference Review. 228

17       Heritage Advisory Committee. 242

18       Annual Development Data 2019. 265

19       Monthly Building Statistics - 1 January - 31 January 2020. 273


 

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 3

 

17/2/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The General Manager reports:

 

“That in accordance with the provisions of Part 2 Regulation 8(6) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015, these supplementary matters are submitted for the consideration of the Committee.

 

Pursuant to Regulation 8(6), I report that:

 

(a)     information in relation to the matter was provided subsequent to the distribution of the agenda;

 

(b)     the matter is regarded as urgent; and

 

(c)     advice is provided pursuant to Section 65 of the Act.”

 


 

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 4

 

17/2/2020

 

 

Committee Acting as Planning Authority

 

In accordance with the provisions of Part 2 Regulation 25 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015, the intention of the Committee to act as a planning authority pursuant to the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993 is to be noted.

 

In accordance with Regulation 25, the Committee will act as a planning authority in respect to those matters appearing under this heading on the agenda, inclusive of any supplementary items.

 

The Committee is reminded that in order to comply with Regulation 25(2), the General Manager is to ensure that the reasons for a decision by a Council or Council Committee acting as a planning authority are recorded in the minutes.

      


Item No. 13

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 27

 

17/2/2020

 

 

13       179-191 Murray Street, Hobart, 62 Patrick Street, Hobart Adjacent Road Reserve - Demolition and New Building for General Retail and Hire, Bulky Goods Sales and 68 Multiple Dwellings

            PLN-19-486 - FILE REF: F20/14703

Address:                         179-191 Murray Street, Hobart 62 Patrick Street Hobart, Adjacent Road Reserve

Proposal:                       Demolition and New Building for General Retail and Hire, Bulky Good Sales and 68 Multiple Dwellings

Expiry Date:                   25 February 2020

Extension of Time:       Not applicable

Author:                           Helen Ayers

 

REcommendation

That pursuant to the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015, the Council approve the application for demolition and new building for general retail and hire, bulky goods sales and 68 multiple dwellings at 179 ­ 191 Murray Street and 62 Patrick Street, Hobart and the adjacent road reservation for the reasons outlined in the officer’s report and a permit containing the following conditions be issued:

 

 

GEN

 

 

The use and/or development must be substantially in accordance with the documents and drawings that comprise PLN­19­486 ­ 179­191 MURRAY STREET HOBART TAS 7000 ­ Final Planning Documents, except where modified below.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To clarify the scope of the permit.

 

 

TW

 

 

The use and/or development must comply with the requirements of TasWater as detailed in the form Submission to Planning Authority Notice, Reference No. TWDA 2019/01398­HCC dated 07/10/2019 as attached to the permit.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To clarify the scope of the permit.

 

 

PLN 15a

 

 

A demolition waste management plan must be implemented throughout demolition. The demolition waste management plan must include provisions for the handling, transport and disposal of demolition material, including any contaminated waste and recycling opportunities, to satisfy the above requirement.

 

 

Advice:

 

 

It is recommended that the developer liaise with the Council’s Cleansing and Solid Waste Unit regarding reducing, reusing and recycling materials associated with demolition on the site to minimise solid waste being directed to landfill. Further information can also be found on the Council’s website.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To ensure that solid waste management from the site meets the Council’s requirements and standards

 

 

PLN 2

 

 

Planter boxes with an internal dimension of 0.5m, must be provided on the first floor of the building at all junctions between terraces and roofs of the level below. These planter boxes must not reduce the dimension of the terraces, and must encroach over the roof area. Lesser internal dimensions for these planter boxes may be entertained, but must be accompanied by justification from a suitably qualified horticultural expert as to how the proposed depth is capable of sustaining suitable planting, to the satisfaction of the Council.

 

 

Additional planter boxes to a maximum depth of 0.3m may be installed to the outer edge of all remaining terraces as desired, but are not required.

 

 

Landscaping must be installed in the first floor planter boxes prior to first occupation of the dwellings, and maintained for the life of the use of the building.

 

 

Prior to the completion of the building, an automated watering system must be installed for all planter boxes and maintained for the life of the use of the building.

 

 

Prior to the issue of any approval under the Building Act 2016, revised plans must be submitted and approved showing planter boxes in accordance with the above requirement.

 

 

All work required by this condition must be undertaken in accordance with the approved revised plans.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To ensure that the scale of the building is compatible with nearby buildings.

 

 

PLN 4

 

 

A landscaping plan detailing the proposed planting for the planter boxes on the first floor of the building must be submitted and approved by the Council’s Director City Planning prior to the commencement of works (other than demolition and site preparation).

 

 

The Landscaping Plan must include:

 

 

1.     Details of the proposed species, including height and canopy spread for all proposed plants.

2.     Details of the proposed treatment of the soil in the planter beds to ensure their capacity to sustain the proposed plantings.

 

 

All landscaping must be planted and installed in accordance with the approved Landscaping Plan to the satisfaction of the Council's Director City Planning prior to commencement of use.

 

 

Advice: For further information regarding satisfaction of this condition, please liaise with the Council's Program Leader Arboriculture and Nursery by phoning 6238 2807.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To ensure that the scale of the building is compatible with nearby buildings, and that the plantings proposed are appropriate to assist with this.

 

 

ENG sw1

 

 

All stormwater from the proposed development (including but not limited to: roofed areas, ag drains, retaining wall ag drains and impervious surfaces such as driveways and paved areas) must be drained to the Council’s stormwater infrastructure prior to first occupation or commencement of use (whichever occurs first).

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To ensure that stormwater from the site will be discharged to a suitable Council approved outlet.

 

 

ENG sw2.1

 

 

A pre­construction CCTV recording of the Council’s stormwater main within/adjacent to the proposed development, along with photos of any drainage structures to be connected to or built over, must be submitted to Council prior to the commencement of work or issue of any consent under the Building Act 2016 (whichever occurs first).

 

The post­construction CCTV recording and photos will be relied upon to establish the extent of any damage caused to Council’s stormwater infrastructure during construction. If the owner/developer fails to provide Council with pre­construction CCTV recording then any damage to Council’s infrastructure identified in the post­construction CCTV recording will be deemed to be the responsibility of the owner.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To ensure that any of the Council infrastructure and/or site­related service connections affected by the proposal will be altered and/or reinstated at the owner’s full cost.

 

 

ENG sw2.2

 

 

A post­construction CCTV recording of the Council’s stormwater main within/adjacent to the proposed development, along with photos of any existing drainage structures connected to or built over as part of the development, must be submitted to Council prior to issue of any Completion or first occupancy (whichever occurs first).

 

 

The post­construction CCTV recording and photos will be relied upon to establish the extent of any damage caused to Council’s stormwater infrastructure during construction. If the owner/developer fails to provide Council with pre­construction CCTV then any damage to Council’s infrastructure identified in the post­construction CCTV will be deemed to be the responsibility of the owner.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To ensure that any of the Council infrastructure and/or site­related service connections affected by the proposal will be altered and/or reinstated at the owner’s full cost.

 

 

ENG sw3

 

 

The proposed multi­storey apartment including foundations and overhangs must be designed to ensure the protection and access to the Council’s stormwater main and flood path.

 

 

A detailed design must be submitted and approved prior to any approval under the Building Act 2016. The detailed design must:

 

 

1.     Be prepared and certified by a suitably qualified engineer.

2.     Demonstrate how the design will provide adequate access to the main, impose no additional loads onto the main, that the structure will be fully independent of the main and its trenching, and resist all flood­related forces.

3.     Confirm both the temporary and permanent basement walls / propping provide adequate lateral support for the stormwater infrastructure.

4.     Include cross­sections clearly showing the relationship both vertically and horizontally between Council’s stormwater infrastructure and the proposed works (including footings), and stating the final minimum setbacks from the works to the nearest external surface of the main. Clearly state how the minimum setbacks have been calculated.

 

 

Prior to issue of Occupancy, a suitably qualified engineer must confirm the installation of the works within two metres of Council’s stormwater is in accordance with the approved drawings and complies with this condition. Should any remediation works be required, these must be carried out at the developer’s cost.

 

 

All work required by this condition must be undertaken in accordance with the approved detailed design.

 

 

Advice:

 

 

Setbacks less than those shown in the Gandy and Roberts structural drawings Rev3 will not be accepted.

 

The applicant is required to submit detailed design documentation to satisfy this condition via the Council's planning condition endorsement process (noting there is a fee associated with condition endorsement approval of engineering drawings [see general advice on how to obtain condition endorsement and for fees and charges]). This is a separate process to any building approval under the Building Act 2016.

 

 

Failure to address condition requirements prior to submitting for building approval may result in unexpected delays.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To ensure the protection of the Council’s hydraulic infrastructure.

 

 

ENG sw5

 

 

Construction of the works must not adversely impact the Council stormwater infrastructure (ie the overland low path and twin DN1050 piped watercourse)

 

A Construction Management Infrastructure Protection Report and plans must be submitted and approved prior to commencement of works or issue of any consent under the Building Act 2016 (whichever occurs first). The report and plans must:

 

 

1.     Be prepared and certified by a suitably qualified and experienced engineer.

2.     Detail the proposed construction methodology and identify all potential risks to the infrastructure during construction including but not limited to construction loading, traffic loading, excavation works, footing construction, vibrations, undermining, flood, pipe trench collapse, and environmental harm.

3.     Provide treatment measures to eliminate or otherwise mitigate to as low as reasonably practicable all identified risks.

4.     Include a monitoring regime.

 

 

All work required by this condition must be undertaken in accordance with the approved report and plans.

 

 

Advice:

 

 

The applicant is required submit detailed design documentation to satisfy this condition via the Council's planning condition endorsement process (noting there is a fee associated with condition endorsement approval of engineering drawings [see general advice on how to obtain condition endorsement and for fees and charges]). This is a separate process to any building approval under the Building Act 2016. Failure to address condition endorsement requirements prior to submitting for building approval may result in unexpected delays.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To ensure the protection of the Council’s hydraulic infrastructure.

 

 

ENG sw7

 

 

Stormwater pre­treatment for stormwater discharges from the development must be installed prior to commencement of use.

 

 

Prior to any approval under the Building Act 2016, the stormwater pre­

treatment report and design must:

 

 

1.     Be prepared by a suitably qualified engineer.

2.     Include detailed design of the proposed treatment train, including final estimations of contaminant removal to achieve the stormwater quality targets in accordance with the State Stormwater Strategy 2010. Treatment for carpark runoff must target fine sediments and hydrocarbons.

3.     Include a Stormwater Management Summary Plan that outlines the obligations for future property owners to stormwater management, including a maintenance plan which outlines the operational and maintenance measures to check and ensure the ongoing effective operation of all systems, such as: inspection frequency; cleanout procedures; descriptions and diagrams of how the installed systems operate; details of the life of assets and replacement requirements.

 

 

All work required by this condition must be undertaken in accordance with the approved report and design.

 

 

Advice:

 

 

·        Once the plan has been approved Council will issue a condition endorsement (see general advice on how to obtain condition endorsement).

 

·        Where building approval is also required, it is recommended that documentation for condition endorsement be submitted well before submitting documentation for building approval. Failure to address condition endorsement requirements prior to submitting for building approval may result in unexpected delays.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To avoid the possible pollution of drainage systems and natural watercourses, and to comply with relevant State legislation.

 

 

ENG tr2

 

 

A construction traffic and parking management plan must be implemented prior to the commencement of work on the site (including demolition).

 

 

The construction traffic (including cars, public transport vehicles, service vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists) and parking management plan must be submitted and approved, prior to the issue of any approval under the Building Act 2016 or the commencement of works on site (whichever occurs first). The construction traffic and parking management plan must include but not limited to, the following information;

 

1.     Be prepared by a suitably qualified person;

2.     Develop a communications plan to advise the wider community of the traffic and parking impacts during construction;

3.     Include a start date and finish dates of various stages of works;

4.     Include times that trucks and other traffic associated with the works will be allowed to operate; and

5.     Nominate a superintendant, or the like, to advise the Council of the progress of works in relation to the traffic and parking management with regular meetings during the works.

 

 

All work required by this condition must be undertaken in accordance with the approved construction traffic and parking management plan.

 

 

Advice: Once the construction traffic and parking management plan has been approved, the Council will issue a condition endorsement (see general advice on how to obtain condition endorsement).

 

 

Where building approval is also required, it is recommended that documentation for condition endorsement be submitted well before submitting documentation for building approval. Failure to address condition endorsement requirements prior to submitting for building approval may result in unexpected delays.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To ensure the safety of vehicles entering and leaving the development and the safety and access around the development site for the general public and adjacent businesses.

 

 

ENG 2a

 

 

Prior to first occupation or commencement of use (whichever occurs first), vehicular barriers compliant with the Australian Standard AS/NZS1170.1:2002 must be installed to prevent vehicles running off the edge of an access driveway or parking module (parking spaces, aisles and manoeuvring area) where the drop from the edge of the trafficable area to a lower level is 600mm or greater, and wheel stops (kerb) must be installed for drops between 150mm and 600mm. Barriers must not limit the width of the driveway access or parking and turning areas approved under the permit.

 

 

Advice:

 

The Council does not consider a slope greater than 1 in 4 to constitute a lower level as described in AS/NZS 2890.1:2004 Section 2.4.5.3. Slopes greater than 1 in 4 will require a vehicular barrier or wheel stop.

 

Designers are advised to consult the National Construction Code 2016 to determine if pedestrian handrails or safety barriers compliant with the NCC2016 are also required in the parking module this area may be considered as a path of access to a building.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To ensure the safety of users of the access driveway and parking module and compliance with the standard.

 

 

ENG 2c

 

 

Prior to the first occupation, any vehicular barriers required must be inspected by a qualified engineer and certification submitted to the Council confirming that the installed vehicular barriers comply with the certified design and Australian Standard AS/NZS1170.1:2002.

 

 

Advice:

 

 

Certification may be submitted to the Council as part of the Building Act 2016 approval process or via condition endorsement (see general advice on how to obtain condition endorsement).

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To ensure the safety of users of the access driveway and parking module and compliance with the relevant standards.

 

 

ENG 3a

 

 

The access driveway, circulation roadways, ramps and parking module (parking spaces, aisles and manoeuvring area) must be designed and constructed in accordance with Australian Standard AS/NZS2890.1:2004 (including the requirement for vehicle safety barriers where required), or a Council approved alternate design certified by a suitably qualified engineer to provide a safe and efficient access, and enable safe, easy and efficient use.

 

 

Advice:

 

It is advised that designers consider the detailed design of the access and parking module prior to finalising the Finished Floor Level (FFL) of the parking spaces, as failure to do so may result in difficulty complying with this condition.

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To ensure the safety of users of the access and parking module, and compliance with the relevant Australian Standard.

 

 

ENG 3c

 

 

The access driveway, circulation roadways, ramps and parking module (parking spaces, aisles and manoeuvring area) must be constructed in accordance with the HBV Architects documentation received by the Council on the 23rd September 2019 and the Midson Traffic Pty. Ltd. documentation received by the Council on the 7th August 2019, 23rd September 2019, 22nd November 2019 and 12th December 2019.

 

 

Prior to the first occupation, documentation by a suitably qualified engineer certifying that the access driveway and parking module has been constructed in accordance with the above drawings must be lodged with Council.

 

 

Advice:

 

Certification may be submitted to Council as part of the Building Act 2016 approval process or via condition endorsement (see general advice on how to obtain condition endorsement).

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To ensure the safety of users of the access and parking module, and compliance with the relevant Australian Standard.

 

 

ENG 4

 

 

The access driveway and parking module (car parking spaces, aisles and manoeuvring area) approved by this permit must be constructed to a sealed standard (concrete or equivalent Council approved) and surface drained to the Council's stormwater infrastructure prior to the first occupation.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To ensure the safety of users of the access driveway and parking module, and that it does not detract from the amenity of users, adjoining occupiers or the environment by preventing dust and sediment transport.

 

 

ENG 5

 

The number of car parking spaces approved on the site, for use is one hundred and twenty six (126). Of these:

 

 

1.     One (1) parking space must be designated for people with disabilities (in accordance with AS2890.6:2009).

2.     A minimum of one (1) car parking space must be allocated to each dwelling.

3.     The use of each pair of the twenty six (26) tandem/jockey car parking space is restricted to serve the same 2, 3 or 4 bedroom dwelling and must not be designated for visitor or disabled parking.

4.     The thirteen (13) car parking spaces on the ground level must be allocated to the commercial tenancy and not be made available for the residential occupants of the building.

5.     The remaining car parking spaces must be allocated to the residential occupation / use of the building.

 

 

All parking spaces must be delineated by means of white or yellow lines 80mm to 100mm wide, or white or yellow pavement markers in accordance with Australian Standards AS/NZS 2890.1 2004 and AS/NZS 2890.6: 2009, prior to first occupation.

 

 

A sign, approved by Council, and in accordance with Australian Standards AS/NZS1742.11:2016, must be erected at the entry of the basement parking access to indicate the parking area is a private car park for residents only, prior to first occupation.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To ensure the provision of parking for the use is safe and efficient for all users.

 

 

ENG 6

 

 

The 44m2 bicycle parking area (upper basement car parking level) compliant with the Australian Standards AS/NZS 2890.3:2015 and must be constructed on the site in accordance with the Midson Traffic Pty. Ltd. documentation received by the Council on the 7th August 2019 prior to the commencement of the use.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To ensure safe and efficient parking adequate to provide for the use.

 

 

ENG 8

 

 

Any small car parking spaces (< 5.4m but no less than 5.0m in length) must be designated as a space for small cars.

 

 

A sign, approved by Council, and in accordance with Australian Standards AS/NZS1742.11:2016, must be erected at each parking space to indicate the parking space is for a small car only prior to first occupation.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

In the interests of vehicle user safety and the amenity of the development.

 

 

ENG 9

 

 

All car parking spaces for people with disabilities must be delineated to Australian/NZS Standard, Parking facilities Part 6: Off­street parking for people with disabilities AS/NZS 2890.6: 2009, prior to the commencement of the use.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

In the interests of vehicle user safety and the amenity of the development.

 

 

ENG 1

 

 

Any damage to council infrastructure resulting from the implementation of this permit, must, at the discretion of the Council:

 

 

1.     Be met by the owner by way of reimbursement (cost of repair and reinstatement to be paid by the owner to the Council); or

2.     Be repaired and reinstated by the owner to the satisfaction of the Council.

 

 

This must be done within 30 days of the completion of the development or any demand from Council (whichever occurs first). Any damage must be reported immediately to Council.

 

 

A photographic record of the Council's infrastructure adjacent to the subject site must be provided to the Council prior to any commencement of works.

 

 

A photographic record of the Council’s infrastructure (e.g. existing property service connection points, roads, buildings, stormwater, footpaths, driveway crossovers and nature strips, including if any, pre­existing damage) will be relied upon to establish the extent of damage caused to the Council’s infrastructure during construction. In the event that the owner/developer fails to provide to the Council a photographic record of the Council’s infrastructure, then any damage to the Council's infrastructure found on completion of works will be deemed to be the responsibility of the owner.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To ensure that any of the Council's infrastructure and/or site­related service connections affected by the proposal will be altered and/or reinstated at the owner’s full cost.

 

 

ENG r1

 

 

The excavation and/or earth­retaining structures (ie cuttings, retaining walls) and/or footings within or supporting the highway reservation must not undermine the stability and integrity of the highway reservation and its infrastructure.

 

 

Detailed design drawings, structural certificates and associated geotechnical assessments of the walls/footing supporting the highway reservation must be submitted and approved, prior to the commencement of work and must:

 

 

1.     Be prepared and certified by a suitable qualified person and experienced engineer.

2.     Not undermine the stability of the highway reservation.

3.     Be designed in accordance with AS4678, with a design life in accordance with table 3.1 typical application major public infrastructure works.

4.     Take into account any additional surcharge loadings as required by relevant Australian Standards.

5.     Take into account and reference accordingly any Geotechnical findings.

6.     Detail any mitigation measures required.

7.     Detail the design and location of the footing adjacent to the highway reservation.

 

 

All work required by this condition must be undertaken in accordance with the approved select design drawing and structural certificates.

 

 

Advice:

 

 

The applicant is required submit detailed design documentation to satisfy this condition via Council's planning condition endorsement process (noting there is a fee associated with condition endorsement approval of engineering drawings [see general advice on how to obtain condition endorsement and for fees and charges]). This is a separate process to any building approval under the Building Act 2016.

 

Failure to address condition endorsement requirements prior to submitting for building approval may result in unexpected delays.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To ensure that the stability and integrity of the Council’s highway reservation is not compromised by the development.

 

 

ENGR 3

 

 

Prior to the commencement of use, the proposed driveway crossover Patrick Street highway reservation must be designed and constructed in accordance with:

 

 

·        Commercial Urban­ TSD­R09­v1 Urban Roads Driveways and TSD R16­v1 Type KCR & B1 or Type KCRB & B1.

·        Footpath ­ Urban Roads Footpaths TSD­R11­v1.

 

 

Design drawings must be submitted and approved prior to the commencement of work. The design drawing must:

 

 

1.     Show the cross and long section of the driveway crossover within the highway reservation and onto the property.

2.     Detail any services or infrastructure (ie light poles, pits, awnings) at or near the proposed driveway crossover.

3.     Be designed for the expected vehicle loadings. A structural certificate to note that driveway is suitable for heavy vehicle loadings.

4.     If the design deviates from the requirements of the TSD then the drawings must demonstrate that a B85 vehicle or B99 depending on use (AS/NZS 2890.1 2004, section 2.6.2) can access the driveway from the road pavement into the property without scraping the car's underside.

5.     Show that vehicular and pedestrian sight lines are met as per AS/NZS 2890.1 2004.

6.     Be prepared and certified by a suitable qualified person, to satisfy the above requirement.

 

 

All work required by this condition must be undertaken in accordance with the approved drawings.

 

 

Advice:

 

The applicant is required submit detailed design documentation to satisfy this condition via Council's planning condition endorsement process (noting there is a fee associated with condition endorsement approval of engineering drawings [see general advice on how to obtain condition endorsement and for fees and charges]). This is a separate process to any building approval under the Building Act 2016.

 

Please note that your proposal does not include adjustment of footpath levels. Any adjustment to footpath levels necessary to suit the design of proposed floor, parking module or driveway levels will require separate agreement from Council's Road Services Engineer and may require further planning approvals. It is advised to place a note to this affect on construction drawings for the site and/or other relevant engineering drawings to ensure that contractors are made aware of this requirement.

 

Failure to address condition endorsement requirements prior to submitting for building approval may result in unexpected delays.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To ensure that works will comply with the Council’s standard requirements.

 

 

ENG s2

 

 

All garbage collection associated with the development must occur wholly within the site, therefore, on­street garbage collection by private contractors within the Council's Patrick Street Highway Reservation is prohibited.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To ensure the safety of vehicles entering and leaving the development and the safety and access around the development site for the general public and adjacent businesses.

 

 

ENG s3

 

 

A turning bay is to be created adjacent to car parking space "09" located on the ground floor ensuring provision is made for a vehicle to turn around and drive out in forward direction should all parking spaces be occupied.

 

 

The turning bay must be delineated by means of white or yellow pavement lines (including chevron markings) and suitable "NO STANDING ANYTIME TIME" signage.

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To ensure the safety of vehicles entering and leaving the development and the safety and access around the development site for the general public and adjacent businesses.

 

 

ENG s4

 

 

Flood risk to the entire development, including the basement levels, must be adequately managed. All habitable floors must be at least 300mm above the 1% AEP as at 2100 flood level.

 

 

Design drawings prepared and certified by a suitably qualified engineer must be submitted and approved prior to the issuing of any consent under the Building Act 2016.

 

 

These must either:

 

1.     confirm the building design will not allow flood water to enter the building; or

2.     detail appropriate risk mitigation measures for the floor levels below the 1% AEP flood extent, and any required maintenance actions.

 

 

All work required by this condition must be undertaken and maintained in accordance with the approved drawing.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To ensure risk to the building and users of the site is adequately mitigated

 

 

ENV 2

 

 

Sediment and erosion control measures, sufficient to prevent sediment or contaminated water leaving the site and in accordance with an approved soil and water management plan (SWMP), must be installed prior to the commencement of work and maintained until such time as all disturbed areas have been stabilised and/or restored or sealed to the Council’s satisfaction.

 

 

A SWMP must be submitted prior to the issue of any approval under the Building Act 2016 or the commencement of work, whichever occurs first. The SWMP must be prepared in accordance with the Soil and Water Management on Building and Construction Sites fact sheets (Derwent Estuary Program, 2008), available here.

 

All work required by this condition must be undertaken in accordance with the approved SWMP.

 

 

Advice: Once the SWMP has been approved, the Council will issue a condition endorsement (see general advice on how to obtain condition endorsement).

 

 

Where building approval is also required, it is recommended that documentation for condition endorsement be submitted well before submitting documentation for building approval. Failure to address condition endorsement requirements prior to submitting for building approval may result in unexpected delays.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To avoid the pollution and sedimentation of roads, drains and natural watercourses that could be caused by erosion and runoff from the development.

 

 

ENVHE 1

 

 

Recommendations in the report "Draft Environmental Site Assessment 62­64 Patrick Street Hobart" by GES, dated July2019 must be implemented for the duration of excavation works.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To ensure that the risk to future occupants of the building remain low and acceptable.

 

 

OPS s1

 

 

The single fastigate hornbeam (Carpinus betulus 'Fastigata') identified for removal in Patrick Street is to be removed at the developer's cost, prior to the commencement of other works.

 

 

A replacement street tree will be required, to the satisfaction of the Director Parks and City Amenity. The developer will bear the cost of the replacement tree.

 

 

Compensation for the loss of the existing tree, to the value of $2,135.72, is required to be paid prior to the removal of the tree. To arrange payment of this fee, please contact Council's Open Space Planning Team on 6238 2488.

 

 

The tree protection measures stated in the Development Impact Assessment 62­64 Patrick Street, Hobart by Alister Hodgman 3rd September 2019, must be implemented to ensure the protection and retention of the remaining street trees adjacent to the development site.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To maintain the amenity value of street trees as per the City of Hobart Street Tree Strategy and the amenity value calculation method endorsed by a meeting of the full Council on the 18th February 2019.

 

 

ADVICE

 

 

The following advice is provided to you to assist in the implementation of the planning permit that has been issued subject to the conditions above. The advice is not exhaustive and you must inform yourself of any other legislation, by­laws, regulations, codes or standards that will apply to your development under which you may need to obtain an approval. Visit the Council's website for further information.

 

 

Prior to any commencement of work on the site or commencement of use the following additional permits/approval may be required from the Hobart City Council.

 

 

CONDITION ENDORSEMENT ENGINEERING

 

 

All engineering drawings required to be submitted and approved by this planning permit must be submitted to the City of Hobart as a CEP (Condition Endorsement) via the City’s Online Service Development Portal. When lodging a CEP, please reference the PLN number of the associated Planning Application. Each CEP must also include an estimation of the cost of works shown on the submitted engineering drawings. Once that estimation has been confirmed by the City’s Engineer, the following fees are payable for each CEP submitted and must be paid prior to the City of Hobart commencing assessment of the engineering drawings in each CEP:

 

 

Value of Building Works Approved by Planning Permit Fee:

Up to $20,000: $150 per application.

Over $20,000: 2% of the value of the works as assessed by the City's Engineer per assessment.

 

 

These fees are additional to building and plumbing fees charged under the Building and Plumbing Regulations.

 

 

Once the CEP is lodged via the Online Service Development Portal, if the value of building works approved by your planning permit is over $20,000, please contact the City’s Development Engineer on 6238 2715 to confirm the estimation of the cost of works shown on the submitted engineering drawings has been accepted.

 

 

Once confirmed, pleased call one of the City’s Customer Service Officers on 6238 2190 to make payment, quoting the reference number (ie. CEP number) of the Condition Endorsement you have lodged. Once payment is made, your engineering drawings will be assessed.

 

 

BUILDING PERMIT

 

 

You may need building approval in accordance with the Building Act 2016. Click here for more information.

 

 

This is a Discretionary Planning Permit issued in accordance with section 57 of the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993.

 

 

PLUMBING PERMIT

 

 

You may need plumbing approval in accordance with the Building Act 2016, Building Regulations 2016 and the National Construction Code. Click here for more information.

 

 

OCCUPATION OF THE PUBLIC HIGHWAY

 

 

You may require a permit for the occupation of the public highway for construction (e.g. placement of skip bin, crane, scissor lift etc). Click here for more information.

 

 

You may require a road closure permit for construction. Click here for more information.

 

 

You may require a Permit to Open Up and Temporarily Occupy a Highway (for work in the road reserve). Click here for more information.

 

 

GENERAL EXEMPTION (TEMPORARY) PARKING PERMITS

 

 

You may qualify for a General Exemption permit for construction vehicles i.e. residential or meter parking/loading zones. Click here for more information.

 

 

BUILDING NEAR INFRASTRUCTURE

 

 

You will need separate permission under s73of the Building Act 2016 and s13 of the Urban Drainage Act for any works (including cut/fill) within two metres horizontally of the nearest external surface of the stormwater main. Please contact Hobart City Council’s City Infrastructure Division to discuss.

 

STRUCTURES CLOSE TO COUNCILS' STORMWATER MAIN

 

 

The design of structures (including footings) must provide protection for the Council’s infrastructure. For information regarding appropriate designs please contact the Council's City Amenity Division.

 

 

WORK WITHIN THE HIGHWAY RESERVATION

 

 

Please note development must be in accordance with the Hobart City Council’s Infrastructure By law. Click here for more information.

 

 

CBD AND HIGH VOLUME FOOTPATH CLOSURES

 

 

Please note that the City of Hobart does not support the extended closure of public footpaths or roads to facilitate construction on adjacent land.

 

 

It is the developer's responsibility to ensure that the proposal as designed can be constructed without reliance on such extended closures.

 

 

In special cases, where it can be demonstrated that closure of footpaths in the CBD and/or other high volume footpaths can occur for extended periods without unreasonable impact on other businesses or the general public, such closures may only be approved by the full Council.

 

 

For more information about this requirement please contact the Council's Traffic Engineering Unit on 6238 2804.

 

 

DRIVEWAY SURFACING OVER HIGHWAY RESERVATION

 

 

If a coloured or textured surface is used for the driveway access within the Highway Reservation, the Council or other service provider will not match this on any reinstatement of the driveway access within the Highway Reservation required in the future.

 

 

REDUNDANT CROSSOVERS

 

 

Redundant crossovers are required to be reinstated under the Hobart City Council’s Infrastructure By law. Click here for more information.

 

 

ACCESS

 

 

Designed in accordance with LGAT­ IPWEA Tasmanian standard drawings. Click  here for more information.

 

 

CROSS OVER CONSTRUCTION

 

 

The construction of the crossover can be undertaken by the Council or by a private contractor, subject to Council approval of the design. Click here for more information.

 

 

RIGHT OF WAY

 

 

The private right of way must not be reduced, restricted or impeded in any way, and all beneficiaries must have complete and unrestricted access at all times.

 

 

You should inform yourself as to your rights and responsibilities in respect to the private right of way particularly reducing, restricting or impeding the right during and after construction.

 

 

NOISE REGULATIONS

 

 

Click here for information with respect to noise nuisances in residential areas.

 

 

FEES AND CHARGES

 

 

Click here for information on the Council's fees and charges.

 

 

DIAL BEFORE YOU DIG

 

 

Click here for dial before you dig information.

 

 

RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMITS

 

 

Under the City of Hobart Resident Parking Permits policy for the issuing of residential parking permits, the proposed use would not entitle the development to a residential parking permits.

 

 

 

Attachment a:             PLN-19-486 - 179-191 MURRAY STREET HOBART TAS 7000 - Planning Committee or Delegated Report

Attachment b:             PLN-19-486 - 179-191 MURRAY STREET HOBART TAS 7000 - CPC Agenda Documents

Attachment c:            PLN-19-486 - 179-191 MURRAY STREET HOBART TAS 7000 - Planning Referral Officer Cultural Heritage Report

Attachment d:            PLN-19-486 - 179-191 MURRAY STREET HOBART TAS 7000 - Urban Design Advisory Panel Minutes

Attachment e:             PLN-19-486 - 179-191 MURRAY STREET HOBART TAS 7000 - CPC Supporting Documents (Supporting information)    


Item No. 13

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 17/2/2020

Page 86

ATTACHMENT a

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Item No. 13

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 17/2/2020

Page 108

ATTACHMENT b

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Item No. 13

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 17/2/2020

Page 125

ATTACHMENT c

 

PDF Creator


Item No. 13

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 17/2/2020

Page 127

ATTACHMENT d

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Item No. 14

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 129

 

17/2/2020

 

 

14       52 View Street, Sandy Bay - Alterations

            PLN-19-860 - FILE REF: F20/15093

Address:                         52 View Street, Sandy Bay

Proposal:                       Alterations

Expiry Date:                   20 February 2020

Extension of Time:       Not applicable

Author:                           Deanne Lang

 

REcommendation

That pursuant to the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015, the Council approve the application for alterations at 52 View Street, Sandy Bay for the reasons outlined in the officer’s report and a permit containing the following conditions be issued:

 

 

GEN

 

 

The use and/or development must be substantially in accordance with the documents and drawings that comprise PLN­19­860 ­ 52 VIEW STREET SANDY BAY TAS 7005 ­ Final Planning Documents except where modified below.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To clarify the scope of the permit.

 

 

TW

 

 

The use and/or development must comply with the requirements of TasWater as detailed in the form Submission to Planning Authority Notice, Reference No. TWDA 2017/01499 dated 19 March 2019 as attached to the permit.

 

 

Reason for condition

 

 

To clarify the scope of the permit.

 

 

ADVICE

 

 

The following advice is provided to you to assist in the implementation of the planning permit that has been issued subject to the conditions above. The advice is not exhaustive and you must inform yourself of any other legislation, by­laws, regulations, codes or standards that will apply to your development under which you may need to obtain an approval. Visit the Council's website for further information.

 

 

Prior to any commencement of work on the site or commencement of use the following additional permits/approval may be required from the Hobart City Council.

 

 

BUILDING PERMIT

 

 

You may need building approval in accordance with the Building Act 2016. Click here for more information.

 

This is a Discretionary Planning Permit issued in accordance with section 57 of the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993.

 

 

DIAL BEFORE YOU DIG

 

 

Click here for dial before you dig information.

 

 

Attachment a:             PLN-19-860 - 52 VIEW STREET SANDY BAY TAS 7005 - Planning Committee or Delegated Report

Attachment b:             PLN-19-860 - 52 VIEW STREET SANDY BAY TAS 7005 - CPC Agenda Documents   


Item No. 14

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 17/2/2020

Page 142

ATTACHMENT a

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Item No. 14

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 17/2/2020

Page 148

ATTACHMENT b

 


 


 


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator



PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Item No. 15

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 157

 

17/2/2020

 

 

15       26 York Street, Sandy Bay - Partial Demolition, Alterations, Retaining Wall, Car Parking and Front Fencing

            PLN-19-742 - FILE REF: F20/14208

Address:                         26 York Street, Sandy Bay

Proposal:                       Partial Demolition, Alterations, Retaining Wall, Car Parking and Front Fencing

Expiry Date:                   24 February 2020

Extension of Time:       Not applicable

Author:                           Deanne Lang

 

REcommendation

That pursuant to the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015, the Council refuse the application for the partial demolition, alterations, retaining wall, car parking and front fencing at 26 York Street, Sandy Bay for the following reasons:

 

1.    The proposal does not meet the acceptable solution or the performance criterion with respect to clause E13.8.2 A1 or P1 of the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015 because it would result in two car parking spaces significantly between the front facade of the dwelling and the front boundary, causing detriment to the historic cultural heritage significance of the precinct.

 

2.    The proposal does not meet the acceptable solution or the performance criterion with respect to clause E13.8.2 P1 and P5 of the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015 because it would result in the removal of areas of landscaping between a dwelling and a street that contribute to the historic cultural significance, streetscape values and character of the precinct.

 

 

 

Attachment a:             PLN-19-742 - 26 YORK STREET SANDY BAY TAS 7005 - Planning Committee or Delegated Report

Attachment b:             PLN-19-742 - 26 YORK STREET SANDY BAY TAS 7005 - CPC Agenda Documents

Attachment c:            PLN-19-742 - 26 YORK STREET SANDY BAY TAS 7005 - Planning Referral Officer Cultural Heritage Report

Attachment d:            PLN-19-742 - 26 YORK STREET SANDY BAY TAS 7005 - Planning Referral Officer Development Engineering Report   


Item No. 15

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 17/2/2020

Page 174

ATTACHMENT a

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Item No. 15

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 17/2/2020

Page 198

ATTACHMENT b

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator



 


 


 


 


 


 


 


PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Item No. 15

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 17/2/2020

Page 213

ATTACHMENT c

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Item No. 15

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 17/2/2020

Page 227

ATTACHMENT d

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Item No. 16

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 228

 

17/2/2020

 

 

16     Urban Design Advisory Panel - Terms of Reference Review

          File Ref: F20/1290

Report of the Director City Planning of 12 February 2020 and attachments.

Delegation:     Council


Item No. 16

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 233

 

17/2/2020

 

 

REPORT TITLE:                  Urban Design Advisory Panel - Terms of Reference Review

REPORT PROVIDED BY:  Director City Planning

 

1.         Report Purpose and Community Benefit

1.1.     The Urban Design Advisory Panel (UDAP) was formed in October 2011 to principally provide independent urban design advice to promote good design and a quality urban environment.  The Terms of Reference (ToR) (see Attachment A) for the panel are required to be reviewed a minimum of once every two years.  The purpose of this report is to seek endorsement of the revised ToR. 

1.2.     UDAP provides the Council with a cost effective and highly qualified panel of experts that can provide feedback to proponents on proposals before they lodge formal planning applications as well as provide qualified advice on Council’s own development proposals and urban design policy considerations.

2.         Report Summary

2.1.     The Urban Design Advisory Panel has provided the Council with invaluable qualified advice and has sought to improve the level of urban design in major developments within the City since its inception in 2011. 

2.2.     The current ToR provide a solid basis to maintain this service, however, there are some opportunities for refining them to accommodate proxies for both the Australian Institute of Architects and the Landscape Architect Institute of Australia Tasmanian Chapters, amend the membership to recognise the retirement of the Executive Manager City Design and to recognise the additional work of the Chair of the panel in terms of the remuneration.  It is also proposed to extend the terms of the members and the review period to 3 years to reduce the administrative burden of these tasks.  (see Attachment B for revised ToR).  In addition it is proposed to include a further member in light of the retirement of the Executive Manager City Design.  Finally The Uban Design Advisory Panel has suggested some minor modifications to the wording relating to the purpose and meeting administrative sections.  A track change version of the proposed changes to the ToR is included in attachement B. 


 

 

3.         Recommendation

That:

1.    That the Urban Design Advisory Panel’s Terms of Reference be amended in accordance with Attachment B of this report including replacing the position previously held by Executive Manager City Design with a member who currently holds an academic position in urban design, and the current members of the Panel be advised accordingly.

2.    That public nomination for the positions of the chair, the member with both planning and urban design expertise and the member who currently holds an academic position in urban design be called and the current incumbents be invited to nominate for these positions.

 

 

4.         Background

4.1.     The quality of the urban design of major developments are often scrutinised by the public and can be a challenge for officers and Aldermen alike to critique as part of the planning assessment process.  Prior to the establishment of the UDAP there was little urban design specialist advice provided in the assessment of major developments.  The Panel has served to provide both the Council and proponents with this specialist advice and to importantly allow proponents to modify their proposals as appropriate prior to formally lodging applications. 

4.2.     The Panel when originally formed had a membership of four.  The membership of the Panel was increased in 2012 to six to provide for adequate coverage when members were away and to account for the fact that the position on the Panel for the State Architect remains unfilled by State Government since 2011.

4.3.     In the last two years the UDAP has met to consider 20 separate developments and 3 urban design policy items

4.4.     The Executive Manager City Design who was a member of the Urban Design Advisory Panel resigned at the end of 2018.  This position no longer exists and it is therefore an opportunity to consider if and who might fill this position.  The Urban Design Advisory Panel has suggested that the position be replaced with an academic with urban design expertise possibly from the University of Tasmania if it is not being refilled with a Council officer.  If the Council were of the mind to agree to this then the representative would have to exclude themselves from any matters pertaining to the University of Tasmania.  There may be suitable academics not associated with the University of Tasmania that maybe interested in the role in which case a wider expression of interest maybe appropriate. 

4.5.     The Urban Design Advisory Panel has also suggested other minor changes to the ToR which assist in the clarifying the roles and responsibilities to Council and its officers.

5.         Proposal and Implementation

5.1.     The ToR for the UDAP have progressively evolved over time. The proposed changes represent a further clarification of the roles and responsibility of the Panel and other changes that provide for improvements in the effectiveness of the Panel. 

5.2.     The proposed changes to the ToR include

5.2.1.     Providing proxies for members of the Tasmanian Chapters of the Australian Institute of Architects and the Australian Institute of Landscape Architects.

5.2.2.     Extending the terms of the members from 2-3 years

5.2.3.     Recognising the additional workload of the chair of the Panel.

5.2.4.     Replacing the position formally held by the Executive Manager City Design with a member who currently holds an academic position in urban design.

5.2.5.     Increasing the sitting fees commensurate with CPI increases over the 2 year period since the last review.

5.2.6.     Clarifying the advice role of the Panel.

6.         Strategic Planning and Policy Considerations

6.1.     The Capital City Strategic Plan has strong support for the roles and responsibilities of the UDAP.  They include

6.1.1.     1.2.7. Champion, encourage and acknowledge design excellence in the built environment.

6.1.2.     1.3.2. Ensure a cross-disciplinary organisational culture that provides for integrated, strategic decision making and diverse input into major projects.

6.1.3.     7.4.6. Work with experts in government, industry and academia to understand the trends and changes that will affect Hobart’s built environment.

6.1.4.     7.4.7 Engage the community in conversations about the built environment, land use planning and major projects.

7.         Financial Implications

7.1.     Funding Source and Impact on Current Year Operating Result

7.1.1.     The proposed changes to the ToR does not have a significant impact on the current operating budget.

7.2.     Impact on Future Years’ Financial Result

7.2.1.     An allocation of $25,000 will be provided for the funding of UDAP in future financial years.

8.         Legal, Risk and Legislative Considerations

8.1.     The UDAP has an advisory role only with no statutory standing.  Accordingly there is little legal or legislative risk with its operation. 

9.         Environmental Considerations

9.1.     The ToR of the Panel allows for it to provide advice on such matters where relevant.

10.      Social and Customer Considerations

10.1.   Improved urban design outcomes for both proponents and the public are a principle objective of establishing the Panel.

11.      Marketing and Media

11.1.   The review of the ToR for the Panel is not expected to be of significant media interest

12.      Community and Stakeholder Engagement

12.1.   The existing UDAP membership were consulted on the review of the ToR.

12.2.   The role of UDAP will continue to be promoted by Council officers with proponents were appropriate

13.      Delegation

13.1.   This matter is delegated to the Council.

 

As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.

 

Neil Noye

Director City Planning

 

 

Date:                            12 February 2020

File Reference:          F20/1290

 

 

Attachment a:             Urban Design Advisory Panel Terms of Reference

Attachment b:             Proposed Urban Design Advisory Panel Terms of Reference   


Item No. 16

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 17/2/2020

Page 237

ATTACHMENT a

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Item No. 16

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 17/2/2020

Page 241

ATTACHMENT b

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Item No. 17

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 242

 

17/2/2020

 

 

17     Heritage Advisory Committee

          File Ref: F20/15956

Memorandum of the Director City Planning and the Senior Cultural Heritage Officer of 12 February 2020 and attachments.

Delegation:     Committee


Item No. 17

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 245

 

17/2/2020

 

 

 

 

Memorandum: City Planning Committee

 

Heritage Advisory Committee

 

Background

The report of the Senior Cultural Heritage Officer dated 9 February 2016 (Attachment A) was considered by Council on 22 February and referred back to City Planning Committee.

In response, a further Memorandum dated 8 April 2016 (Attachment B) was considered by the City Planning Committee on 18 April 2016.  The Committee recommended that no further action be taken in relation to the matter.

The following recommendation was put to Council on 26 April 2016 (Item 10):

That the information contained in the report of the Acting General Manager and Senior Cultural Heritage Officer, attached to item 7 of the Open City Planning Committee agenda of 18 April 2016 be received by the Council, and the Council take no further action in relation to the establishment of a Heritage Advisory Committee.

The motion was not carried.

The matter was referred back to City Planning Committee for further consideration.

This Memorandum reiterates the previous supporting information, and seeks Council’s in-principle endorsement for the establishment of a Heritage Advisory Committee.

Proposal

The report of 9 February 2016 (paragraph 3.3) alluded to examples of other Heritage Advisory Committees throughout Australia.  Examples include the City of Yarra, Parramatta, Shepparton and Launceston.  The terms of reference from each of these councils are also attached (Attachment C).

Some common elements, in terms of functions and role are:

·    To provide advice to Council on strategic heritage policy;

·    To support Council in the promotion of heritage matters;

·    To raise awareness of existing and new heritage services available and to assist in the development of future heritage services;

·    To facilitate the views of residents and heritage groups to Council on heritage matters (but not specific planning applications).

If the concept of a Heritage Advisory Group is adopted, it is recommended that the group should not have a role in relation to general statutory matters (e.g. current planning applications)

Likely composition could be two aldermen, representatives from National Trust, tourism industry, Tasmanian Historical Research Association, ICOMOS, and two general community members.

It is suggested that meetings be held six-monthly; more frequent meetings could potentially have a significant impact upon staff resources, in terms of servicing the committee. 

The risk of having such a committee is the expectation that recommendations from the committee will be implemented.  Currently the resources allocated to the heritage functions of the Council are fully utilised and any further program expansion would either come at the cost of existing programs or would require additional budgetary allocation.  Any decision to establish such a committee should therefore be mindful of the additional recommendations that will inevitably arise. 

Council’s consideration is therefore sought as to whether it wishes to proceed with the proposal as outlined in Attachment A.

 

REcommendation

That:

1.      The Council determines whether it wishes to proceed with a Heritage Advisory Committee as outlined in Attachment A of this report.

 

As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.

 

Neil Noye

Director City Planning

Brendan Lennard

Senior Cultural Heritage Officer

 

Date:                            12 February 2020

File Reference:          F20/15956

 

 

Attachment a:             City Planning Committee Report dated February 2016

Attachment b:             Memorandum dated April 2016

Attachment c:            Examples of Heritage Committees   


Item No. 17

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 17/2/2020

Page 251

ATTACHMENT a

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Item No. 17

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 17/2/2020

Page 253

ATTACHMENT b

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Item No. 17

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 17/2/2020

Page 264

ATTACHMENT c

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Item No. 18

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 265

 

17/2/2020

 

 

18     Annual Development Data 2019

          File Ref: F20/15736

Memorandum of the Director City Planning of 12 February 2020 and attachments.

Delegation:     Committee


Item No. 18

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 267

 

17/2/2020

 

 

 

 

Memorandum: City Planning Committee

 

Annual Development Data 2019

 

The purpose of this report is to provide the Council with information on commercial and residential development within the municipality during 2019.

 

The information that is attached is:

 

·    Major building approvals ($1.5 million and over) issued in 2019;

·    Visitor accommodation approvals to 31 December 2019;

·    Building approved number of new residential dwellings 2019; and

·    Building activity graph showing a breakdown of the type of building approvals.

 

REcommendation

That:

1.      The information contained in the memorandum titled Annual Development Data 2019 be received and noted.

 

As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.

 

Neil Noye

Director City Planning

 

 

Date:                            12 February 2020

File Reference:          F20/15736

 

 

Attachment a:             Building Activity 2015 - 2019

Attachment b:             Visitor Accommodation Approved to 31.12.2019

Attachment c:            2019 Major Building Approvals ($1.5 million and over) issued in 2019

Attachment d:            Building Approved new residential dwellings 2019   


Item No. 18

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 17/2/2020

Page 268

ATTACHMENT a

 

PDF Creator


Item No. 18

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 17/2/2020

Page 269

ATTACHMENT b

 


Item No. 18

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 17/2/2020

Page 271

ATTACHMENT c

 


 


Item No. 18

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 17/2/2020

Page 272

ATTACHMENT d

 

PDF Creator


Item No. 19

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 273

 

17/2/2020

 

 

19     Monthly Building Statistics - 1 January - 31 January 2020

          File Ref: F20/15750

Memorandum of the Director City Planning of 12 February 2020 and attachments.

Delegation:     Committee


Item No. 19

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 275

 

17/2/2020

 

 

 

 

Memorandum: City Planning Committee

 

Monthly Building Statistics - 1 January - 31 January 2020

 

Attached is the Monthly Building Statistics for the period 1 January 2020 to 31 January 2020.

 

REcommendation

That:

The Director City Planning reports:

 

1.      During the period 1 January 2020 to 31 January 2020, 36 permits were issued to the value of $9,774,648 which included:

 

(i)      16 for Extensions/Alterations to Dwellings to the value of $1,796,647;

 

(ii)     6 New Dwellings to the value of $2,924,500; and

 

(iii)    1 Major Project:

 

(a)       85-99 Collins Street, Hobart - Commercial Internal Alterations - $2,896,000.

 

2.      During the period 1 January 2019 to 31 January 2019, 45 permits were issued to the value of $49,887,762 which included:

 

(i)      22 for Extensions/Alterations to Dwellings to the value of $1,842,977;

 

(ii)     8 New Dwellings to the value of $3,226,000; and

 

(iii)    4 Major Projects:

 

(a)       34 Argyle Street, Hobart - New Building (Stage 3, Fit-Out) - $27,000,000;

(b)       126 Bathurst Street, Hobart (The Commons) - New Multi Story x 30 Dwellings (Stage 2) - $9,900,000;

(c)        286 Argyle Street, North Hobart - Change of Use to Residential Property x 12 Apartments - $4,000,000;

(d)       1 Fisher Avenue, Sandy Bay - Commercial Internal Alterations (Year 5 & 6, Fahan School) - $1,500,000

1.      In the twelve months ending 31 January 2020, 612 permits were issued to the value of $301,348,994; and

 

2.      In the twelve months ending 31 January 2019, 654 permits were issued to the value of $488,523,611.

 

 

As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.

 

Neil Noye

Director City Planning

 

 

Date:                            12 February 2020

File Reference:          F20/15750

 

 

Attachment a:             Value of Building Permits Issued - 5 Year Comparison - January 2020

Attachment b:             Number of Building Permits Issued - 5 Year Comparison - January 2020   


Item No. 19

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 17/2/2020

Page 276

ATTACHMENT a

 

PDF Creator


Item No. 19

Supplementary Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 17/2/2020

Page 277

ATTACHMENT b

 

PDF Creator