City
of hobart
AGENDA
City Planning Committee Meeting
Open Portion
Tuesday, 13 June 2017
at 5.00 pm
Lady Osborne Room, Town Hall
THE MISSION
Our mission is to ensure good governance of our capital City.
THE VALUES
The Council is:
about people |
We value people – our community, our customers and colleagues. |
professional |
We take pride in our work. |
enterprising |
We look for ways to create value. |
responsive |
We’re accessible and focused on service. |
inclusive |
We respect diversity in people and ideas. |
making a difference |
We recognise that everything we do shapes Hobart’s future. |
|
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 3 |
|
13/6/2017 |
|
Business listed on the agenda is to be conducted in the order in which it is set out, unless the committee by simple majority determines otherwise.
APOLOGIES AND LEAVE OF ABSENCE
1. Co-Option of a Committee Member in the event of a vacancy
3. Consideration of Supplementary Items
4. Indications of Pecuniary and Conflicts of Interest
6. Planning Authority Items - Consideration of Items With Deputations
7. Committee Acting as Planning Authority
7.1 Applications under the Sullivans Cove Planning Scheme 1997
7.2 Applications under the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015
8.1 Delegated Decisions Report (Planning)
8.2 City Planning - Advertising List
8.3 Visitor Accommodation - Proposed Interim Planning Directive
9. Responses To Questions Without Notice
9.2 Overview of Powers for the Provision of Retrospective Planning Approvals
11. Closed Portion Of The Meeting
|
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 5 |
|
13/6/2017 |
|
City Planning Committee Meeting (Open Portion) held Tuesday, 13 June 2017 at 5.00 pm in the Lady Osborne Room, Town Hall.
COMMITTEE MEMBERS Briscoe (Chairman) Ruzicka Burnet Denison
ALDERMEN Lord Mayor Hickey Deputy Lord Mayor Christie Zucco Sexton Cocker Thomas Reynolds Harvey |
Apologies: Nil.
Leave of Absence: Nil.
|
The minutes of the Open Portion of the City Planning Committee meeting held on Monday, 29 May 2017, are submitted for confirming as an accurate record.
|
Ref: Part 2, Regulation 8(6) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015.
That the Committee resolve to deal with any supplementary items not appearing on the agenda, as reported by the General Manager.
|
Ref: Part 2, Regulation 8(7) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015.
Aldermen are requested to indicate where they may have any pecuniary or conflict of interest in respect to any matter appearing on the agenda, or any supplementary item to the agenda, which the committee has resolved to deal with.
Regulation 15 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015.
A committee may close a part of a meeting to the public where a matter to be discussed falls within 15(2) of the above regulations.
In the event that the committee transfer an item to the closed portion, the reasons for doing so should be stated.
Are there any items which should be transferred from this agenda to the closed portion of the agenda, or from the closed to the open portion of the agenda?
In accordance with the requirements of Part 2 Regulation 8(3) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015, the General Manager is to arrange the agenda so that the planning authority items are sequential.
In accordance with Part 2 Regulation 8(4) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015, the Committee by simple majority may change the order of any of the items listed on the agenda, but in the case of planning items they must still be considered sequentially – in other words they still have to be dealt with as a single group on the agenda.
Where deputations are to be received in respect to planning items, past practice has been to move consideration of these items to the beginning of the meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
That in accordance with Regulation 8(4) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015, the Committee resolve to deal with any items which have deputations by members of the public regarding any planning matter listed on the agenda, to be taken out of sequence in order to deal with deputations at the beginning of the meeting.
|
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 7 |
|
13/6/2017 |
|
In accordance with the provisions of Part 2 Regulation 25 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015, the intention of the Committee to act as a planning authority pursuant to the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993 is to be noted.
In accordance with Regulation 25, the Committee will act as a planning authority in respect to those matters appearing under this heading on the agenda, inclusive of any supplementary items.
The Committee is reminded that in order to comply with Regulation 25(2), the General Manager is to ensure that the reasons for a decision by a Council or Council Committee acting as a planning authority are recorded in the minutes.
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 8 |
|
|
13/6/2017 |
|
7.1 Applications under the Sullivans Cove Planning Scheme 1997
7.1.1 Salamanca Square and Castray Esplanade, Battery Point and 3 Argyle Street, Morrison Street, 3 Morrison Street, Hobart - Signage
PLN-17-288 - FILE REF: F17/57255
Address: Salamanca Square and Castray Esplanade, Battery Point and 3 Argyle Street, Morrison Street, 3 Morrison Street, Hobart
Proposal: Signage
Expiry Date: 14 July 2017
Extension of Time: Not applicable
Author: Cameron Sherriff
REcommendation Pursuant to the Sullivans Cove Planning Scheme 1997, the Council approve the application for Signage at Salamanca Square and Castray Esplanade, Battery Point and 3 Argyle Street, Morrison Street and 3 Morrison Street, Hobart for the reasons outlined in the officer’s report and a permit containing the following conditions be issued:
GEN
The use and/or development must be substantially in accordance with the documents and drawings that comprise PLN17288 SALAMANCA SQUARE CASTRAY ESPLANADE BATTERY POINT TAS 7004 3 ARGYLE STREET MORRISON STREET 30 MORRISON STREET HOBART TAS 7000 Final Planning Documents except where modified below.
Reason for condition
To clarify the scope of the permit.
ADVICE
The following advice is provided to you to assist in the implementation of the planning permit that has been issued subject to the conditions above. The advice is not exhaustive and you must inform yourself of any other legislation, bylaws, regulations, codes or standards that will apply to your development under which you may need to obtain an approval. Visit the Council's website for further information.
Prior to any commencement of work on the site or commencement of use the following additional permits/approval may be required from the Hobart City Council.
WORK WITHIN THE HIGHWAY RESERVATION
Please note development must be in accordance with the Hobart City Council’s Highways By law. Click here for more information. .
|
Attachment a: PLN-17-288
- SALAMANCA SQUARE BATTERY POINT TAS 7004 - Planning Committee or Delegated Report ⇩
Attachment
b: PLN-17-288
- SALAMANCA SQUARE - CASTRAY ESPLANADE - BATTERY POINT TAS 7004 - 3
ARGYLE STREET - MORRISON STREET - 30 MORRISON STREET - HOBART TAS 7000 - CPC
Agenda Documents ⇩
Attachment
c: PLN-17-288
- SALAMANCA SQUARE - CASTRAY ESPLANADE - BATTERY POINT TAS 7004 - 3
ARGYLE STREET - MORRISON STREET - 30 MORRISON STREET - HOBART TAS 7000 - CPC
Supporting Documents (Supporting information)
Item No. 7.1.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 10 ATTACHMENT a |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 19 ATTACHMENT b |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 27 |
|
|
13/6/2017 |
|
7.2 Applications under the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015
7.2.1 188 Strickland Avenue and Adjacent Road Reserve, South Hobart - Multiple Dwellings and Vegetation Clearance
PLN-16-1112 - FILE REF: F17/57210
Address: 188 Strickland Avenue and Adjacent Road Reserve, South Hobart
Proposal: Multiple Dwellings and Vegetation Clearance
Expiry Date: 10 July 2017
Extension of Time: Not applicable
Author: Elizabeth Wilson
REcommendation Pursuant to the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015, the Council approve the application for Multiple Dwellings and Vegetation Clearance at 188 Strickland Avenue and Adjacent Road Reserve, South Hobart for the reasons outlined in the officer’s report and a permit containing the following conditions be issued:
GEN
The use and/or development must be substantially in accordance with the documents and drawings that comprise PLN161112 188 Strickland Avenue, South Hobart Final Planning Documents except where modified below.
Reason for condition
To clarify the scope of the permit.
TW
The use and/or development must comply with the requirements of TasWater as detailed in the form Submission to Planning Authority Notice, Reference No. TWDA 2016/01565HCC dated 24 March 2017 as attached to the permit.
Reason for condition
To clarify the scope of the permit.
ENG sw4
The development (all impervious areas including roofs, driveways, parking and maneuvering areas) must be drained to the Council stormwater infrastructure. New stormwater connections must be constructed at the owner’s expense and any proposed abandoned stormwater connections sealed by the Council at the owner’s expense, prior to first occupation.
Detailed engineering design drawings must be submitted and approved by the Council's Director City Infrastructure, prior to obtaining any plumbing Certificate of Likely Compliance under the Building Act 2016.
The design drawing for the proposed stormwater connection to Strickland Avenue Table Drain must:
· Include the location of the proposed stormwater connection;
· Include the size of the proposed stormwater connection appropriate to satisfy the needs of the development
· Include the material of the proposed stormwater connection the Council and private stormwater infrastructure
· Ensure that stormwater flows exiting the outfall are dissipated and contained within the table drain
All work required by this condition must be undertaken in accordance with the approved design drawings.
Advice: Once the detailed engineered drawings have been approved the Council will issue a condition endorsement (see general advice on how to obtain condition endorsement).
Please note that once the condition endorsement has been issued you will need to contact the Council’s City Infrastructure Unit to initiate an application for service connection.
Reason for condition
To ensure the site is drained adequately.
ENG sw7
Stormwater pretreatment and detention tanks for storm water discharges from the development must be installed prior to first occupation.
A stormwater management design must be submitted and approved by Council's Director City Infrastructure, prior to obtaining any plumbing Certificate of Likely Compliance under the Building Act 2016. The stormwater management design must:
· Be prepared by a suitably qualified person
· Provide detailed design of the detention tank showing the:
· Layout of the inlet and outlet diameter/invert level
· Details of the overflow mechanism and invert level
· Including supporting calculations showing the emptying times for the specified detention tank and outlet size
· Provide detailed design of the stormwater pretreatment showing compliance with the required stormwater quality targets
All work required by this condition must be undertaken in accordance with the approved design.
Advice:
· Once the design has been approved Council will issue a condition endorsement (see general advice on how to obtain condition endorsement)
· It is advised that documentation for condition endorsement is lodged well before a Building Permit is required, as failure to address design requirements until Building Application stage may result in unexpected delays
Reason for condition
To avoid the possible pollution of drainage systems and natural watercourses, and to comply with relevant State legislation.
ENG 2
Vehicle safety barriers where required by Australian Standard AS/NZS2890.1:2004, compliant with AS/NZS1170.1:2002 must be installed prior to the first occupation.
If barriers are not required by AS/NZS2890.1:2004; a report, prepared by a suitably qualified person, demonstrating that barriers are not required must be submitted and approved by Council prior to the issuing of any Certificate of Likely Compliance under the Building Act 2016.
If vehicle safety barriers are required, a certified vehicle crash barrier design (including site plan with proposed location(s) of installation), prepared by a suitably qualified Engineer, to satisfy the above requirements, must be submitted and approved by Council prior to the issuing of any Certificate of Likely Compliance under the Building Act 2016. All works, required by this condition must be undertaken in accordance with certified design.
Prior to the issuing of any Occupancy or Completion Certificate under the Building Act 2016, barriers must be inspected by a qualified engineer and certification submitted to Council, confirming that the installed barriers comply with the above requirement.
Advice:
· If vehicle safety barriers are not required due to a drop of less than 600mm, the designers should make this clear on the drawings to help avoid unnecessary delays in building approval
· If wheelstops (i.e kerb 90 to 110mm high) are not required due to a drop of less than 150mm, the designers should make this clear on the drawings to help avoid unnecessary delays in building approval
· Designers are advised to consult the National Construction Code 2016 to determine if pedestrian handrails or safety barriers compliant with the NCC2016 are also required: http://www.abcb.gov.au/Resources/NCC. Council do not consider a slope greater than 1 in 4 to constitute a lower level as described in AS/NZS 2890.1:2004 Section 2.4.5.3
· Once the design drawing has been approved Council will issue a condition endorsement (see general advice on how to obtain condition endorsement)
· It is advised that documentation for condition endorsement is lodged well before a Building Permit is required, as failure to address design requirements until Building Application stage may result in unexpected delays.
Reason for condition
To ensure that the safety of users of the driveway/parking and compliance with the standard.
ENG 14
Prior to the issuing of any Completion or Occupancy Certificate under the Building Act 2016, documents signed by a suitably qualified engineer, certifying the driveway / parking area / manoeuvring area / access / crossover has been constructed in accordance with the planning permit design drawings, must be lodged with the Council.
Reason for condition
To ensure that the access and parking layout for the development is constructed to accepted standards.
ENG 1
The cost of repair
of any damage to the Council infrastructure resulting from
the implementation of this
permit, must be met by the owners within 30 days of
the completion of the development or as otherwise determined by the Council. A photographic record of the Council infrastructure adjacent to the subject site must be provided to the Council prior to any commencement of works.
A photographic record of the Council’s infrastructure (e.g. existing property service connection points, roads, buildings, stormwater, footpaths, driveway crossovers and nature strips, including if any, pre existing damage) will be relied upon to establish the extent of damage caused to the Council’s infrastructure during construction. In the event that the owner/developer fails to provide to the Council a photographic record of the Council’s infrastructure, then any damage to the Council infrastructure found on completion of works will be deemed to be the responsibility of the owner.
Reason for condition
To ensure that any of the Council infrastructure and/or siterelated service connections affected by the proposal will be altered and/or reinstated at the owner’s full cost.
ENG s1
A revised detailed engineering design drawing of the driveway (Drawing 0195 Sheet 3 and 5 of 6) must be submitted and approved, prior to obtaining any Certificate of Likely Compliance under the Building Act 2016.
The revised detailed engineering design drawings must include:
1. Traffic management device (speed hump) including deliniation in accordance with AS/NZ2890.1 Section 4.9 Type 2 hump at the property boundary.
2. Mountable kerb in accordance with (IPWEA) LGAT – standard drawing TSDR14v1 kerb type KCM2 along the entire north western side of the driveway adjacent to 186b Strickland Avenue boundary.
3. Passing bay between the driveway access to 186b Strickland Avenue and the lot proper.
Advice: It is recommended that long sections of the adjacent property driveway works (to match existing driveways for adjacent properties which share the access off Strickland Avenue) are undertaken prior to construction to ensure the works complies with AS/NZ2890.1 and planning application drawing 0195R1 Sheet 3 of 6 note 6. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in an additional planning permit being required.
Reason for condition
To ensure exiting vehicle speeds are checked prior to driveway confluence with adjacent driveways sharing the access to Strickland Avenue and to ensure access to 186b Strickland Avenue via the Right of Way over 188 Strickland Avenue is maintained along the entire Right of Way.
ENV 9
All trees must be retained other than the trees identified for removal on the Tree Removal Plan by Henry Design and Consulting dated October 2016 (drawing number H16001A19 Rev A) and the Driveway and Services Plan by D Pretyman Survey & Civil Drafting dated March 2016.
Reason for condition
To ensure the use/development minimises impact upon biodiversity values.
ENV 10
The trees to be retained on the lot must be protected in accordance with Australian Standard AS 4970 Protection of trees on development sites, except that determined tree protection zones may be delineated by barrier tape securely attached to posts rather than fencing.
Reason for condition
To ensure the use/development minimises impact upon biodiversity values.
ENV 15
All construction vehicles and machinery must be effectively cleaned of soil before entering the property.
Soil cleaned from construction vehicles and machinery must not be allowed, either directly or indirectly, to enter waterways or the Council’s stomwater system.
Note: further information on effective measures for washdown can be found here.
Reason for condition
To minimise the spread of weeds and pathogens.
ENV 2
Sediment and erosion control measures, in accordance with an approved soil and water management plan (SWMP), must be installed prior to the commencement of work and maintained until such time as all disturbed areas have been stabilised and/or restored or sealed to the Council’s satisfaction.
A SWMP must be submitted and approved, prior to the commencement of work. The SWMP must be prepared in accordance with the Soil and Water Management on Building and Construction Sites fact sheets (Derwent Estuary Program, 2008), available here.
All work required by this condition must be undertaken in accordance with the approved SWMP.
Advice: Once the SWMP has been approved, the Council will issue a condition endorsement (see general advice on how to obtain condition endorsement).
Reason for condition
To avoid the pollution and sedimentation of roads, drains and natural watercourses that could be caused by erosion and runoff from the development.
ADVICE
The following advice is provided to you to assist in the implementation of the planning permit that has been issued subject to the conditions above. The advice is not exhaustive and you must inform yourself of any other legislation, bylaws, regulations, codes or standards that will apply to your development under which you may need to obtain an approval. Visit the Council's website for further information.
Prior to any commencement of work on the site or commencement of use the following additional permits/approval may be required from the Hobart City Council.
CONDITION ENDORSEMENT
As condition endorsements are required by a planning condition above, you will need to submit the relevant documentation to satisfy the condition, via the Condition Endorsement Submission on Council's online eservice portal.
Once approved, the Council will respond to you via email that the condition(s) has been endorsed (satisfied). Detailed instructions can be found here.
BUILDING PERMIT
Building permit in accordance with the Building Act 2016. Click here for more information.
PLUMBING PERMIT
Plumbing permit in accordance with the Building Act 2016, Building Regulations 2016 and the National Construction Code. Click here for more information.
OCCUPATION OF THE PUBLIC HIGHWAY
Permit to Open Up and Temporarily Occupy a Highway (for work in the road reserve). Click here for more information.
NEW SERVICE CONNECTION
New service connection (please contact the Hobart City Council's City Infrastructure Division to initiate the application process).
STORM WATER
Please note that in addition to a building and/or plumbing permit, development must be in accordance with the Hobart City Council’s Hydraulic Services By law. Click here for more information.
WORK WITHIN THE HIGHWAY RESERVATION
Please note development must be in accordance with the Hobart City Council’s Highways By law. Click here for more information.
ACCESS
Designed in accordance with LGAT IPWEA – Tasmanian standard drawings. Click here for more information.
The Environmental Development Planner has advised that the design specifications for the driveway appear to be inconsistent with the requirements of the submitted bushfire report.
CROSS OVER CONSTRUCTION
The construction of the crossover can be undertaken by the Council or by a private contractor, subject to Council approval of the design. Click here for more information.
STORMWATER / ROADS / ACCESS
Services to be designed and constructed in accordance with the (IPWEA) LGAT – standard drawings. Click here for more information.
WEED CONTROL
Effective measures are detailed in the Tasmanian Washdown Guidelines for Weed and Disease Control: Machinery, Vehicles and Equipment (Edition 1, 2004). The guidelines can be obtained from the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment website.
NOISE REGULATIONS
Submitted design specifications for the driveway appear to be inconsistent with the requirements of the submitted bushfire report.
FEES AND CHARGES
Click here for information on the Council's fees and charges.
DIAL BEFORE YOU DIG
Click here for dial before you dig information. .
|
Attachment
a: PLN-16-1112
- 188 STRICKLAND AVENUE SOUTH HOBART TAS 7004 - Planning Committee or Delegated
Report ⇩
Attachment
b: PLN-16-1112
- 188 STRICKLAND AVENUE SOUTH HOBART TAS 7004 - CPC Agenda Documents ⇩
Item No. 7.2.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 37 ATTACHMENT a |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 68 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.2.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 73 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.2.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 74 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.2.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 75 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.2.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 76 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.2.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 77 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.2.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 78 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.2.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 79 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.2.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 80 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.2.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 81 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.2.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 82 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.2.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 83 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.2.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 84 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.2.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 85 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.2.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 86 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.2.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 87 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.2.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 88 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.2.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 89 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.2.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 90 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.2.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 91 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.2.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 92 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.2.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 93 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.2.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 94 ATTACHMENT b |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 132 |
|
|
13/6/2017 |
|
8 Reports
8.1 Delegated Decisions Report (Planning)
File Ref: F17/57107
Memorandum of the Director City Planning of 7 June 2017 and attachment.
Delegation: Committee
Item No. 8.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 133 |
|
13/6/2017 |
|
Memorandum: City Planning Committee
Delegated Decisions Report (Planning)
Attached is the delegated decisions report for the period 22 May 2017 until 4 June 2017.
That the information be received and noted.
|
As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.
Neil Noye Director City Planning |
|
Date: 7 June 2017
File Reference: F17/57107
Attachment a: Delegated
Decisions Report (Planning) ⇩
Item No. 8.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 134 ATTACHMENT a |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 136 |
|
|
13/6/2017 |
|
8.2 City Planning - Advertising List
File Ref: F17/57763
Memorandum of the Director City Planning of 7 June 2017 and attachment.
Delegation: Committee
Item No. 8.2 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 137 |
|
13/6/2017 |
|
Memorandum: City Planning Committee
City Planning - Advertising List
Attached is the advertising list for the period 20 May 2017 until 2 June 2017.
That the information be received and noted.
|
As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.
Neil Noye Director City Planning |
|
Date: 7 June 2017
File Reference: F17/57763
Attachment a: City
Planning - Advertising List ⇩
Item No. 8.2 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 138 ATTACHMENT a |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 143 |
|
|
13/6/2017 |
|
8.3 Visitor Accommodation - Proposed Interim Planning Directive
File Ref: F17/59256; 32-13-4
Memorandum of the Manager Planning Policy and Heritage and the Director City Planning of 8 June 2017 and attachment.
Delegation: Council
Item No. 8.3 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 144 |
|
13/6/2017 |
|
Memorandum: City Planning Committee
Visitor Accommodation - Proposed Interim Planning Directive
Attached is the latest information (Fact Sheet – June 2017) from the State Government on the proposed changes to the status of visitor accommodation.
It is proposed that an Interim Planning Directive will come into effect on 1 July 2017 which will provide an exemption from requiring a planning permit for visitor accommodation if:
(a) the dwelling is used by the owner or occupier as their main place of residence, and only let while the owner or occupier is on vacation; or
(b) the dwelling is used by the owner or occupier as their main place of residence, and visitors are accommodated in not more than 4 bedrooms.
The Directive will make other forms of visitor accommodation permitted in all of the residential zones subject to a maximum size of 300m2.
It is intended that all planning schemes in the State will be amended on the 1st July by the Interim Planning Directive which will then go through an exhibition and hearing process with the Tasmanian Planning Commission (TPC).
This means from 1 July 2017 self-contained visitor accommodation will become permitted in the Inner Residential Zone in Battery Point Heritage Area BP1. This will be a reversal of the long standing position of Council to prohibit self-contained visitor accommodation in Battery Point.
The ‘ban’ on self-contained visitor accommodation in Battery Point has been in place since the introduction of the Battery Point Planning Scheme in 1979.
It was the intent of the Battery Point Planning Scheme to ensure that in the Residential Zone private residential use is given first priority whilst providing for uses which serve local residents or ensure the retention of existing buildings incapable or unsuited to residential usage.
To allow conversion of existing private residences to visitor accommodation was considered inconsistent with the tenor of the Scheme as over time it may result in a significant change to the residential character of Battery Point.
Given the character of Battery Point and its proximity to Sullivans Cove and other tourist attractions, Battery Point is a very attractive location for tourists to stay.
The demand for tourist accommodation in Battery Point is likely to be high and this factor combined with the financial return available from providing visitor accommodation, may lead to a concentration of visitor accommodation uses in Battery Point to the extent that the residential function, character and amenity is diminished.
The character afforded to a residential area from long term residents is different to that from an area where there are large numbers of short term visitors. An area primarily occupied by long term residents will have a greater sense of community and neighbourly character than an area where you are likely to have a new neighbour every night. Battery Point residents had an expectation under the Battery Point Planning Scheme that Battery Point will remain a suburb primarily for long term residents as the Scheme gives “private residential use first priority”.
The City of Hobart Planning Scheme 1982 was amended in September 2000 to make self-contained visitor accommodation a discretionary use in the Residential Zones. Council supported this amendment as it considered that it was unlikely that it would result in a concentration of visitor accommodation uses in any particular area and this has proved to be the case. In Battery Point however the opposite is likely to be the case.
There is also the amenity issue of mixing of long term and short term residents in dwelling complexes. This was a significant issue with the Sullivans Cove Planning Scheme 1997 and was addressed by the prohibition of visitor accommodation in dwelling complexes unless all dwellings were to be used for visitor accommodation.
Council has been consistent in its approach to the issue of Visitor Accommodation (Use Class 5) in Battery Point and has refused the vast majority of applications. (Note - it has been possible to have bed and breakfast style accommodation in Battery Point.)
The Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015 continued the prohibition on self-contained visitor accommodation in Battery Point but allowed the use to be permitted in other residential areas of the city subject to standards limiting the scale.
Given the significant implications for Battery Point it is recommended that the Lord Mayor write to the Minister for Planning and Local Government drawing attention to the issue of making self-contained visitor accommodation permitted in Battery Point and request that the proposed Interim Planning Directive not apply to Battery Point Heritage Area BP1 under the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015.
That: 1. That the information be received and noted. 2. The Lord Mayor write to the Minister for Planning and Local Government drawing attention to the implications of making self-contained visitor accommodation permitted in Battery Point and request that the proposed Interim Planning Directive not apply to Battery Point Heritage Area BP1 under the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015.
|
As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.
James McIlhenny Manager Planning Policy and Heritage |
Neil Noye Director City Planning |
Date: 8 June 2017
File Reference: F17/59256; 32-13-4
Attachment a: Visitor
Accommodation Fact Sheet ⇩
Item No. 8.3 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 13/6/2017 |
Page 147 ATTACHMENT a |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 151 |
|
|
1/5/2017 |
|
Regulation 29(3) Local Government
(Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015.
File Ref: 13-1-10
The General Manager reports:-
“In accordance with the procedures approved in respect to Questions Without Notice, the following responses to questions taken on notice are provided to the Committee for information.
The Committee is reminded that in accordance with Regulation 29(3) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015, the Chairman is not to allow discussion or debate on either the question or the response.”
9.1 Tax on Vacant Properties
File Ref: F17/29303; 13-1-10
Memorandum of the Director City Planning of 7 June 2017.
9.2 Overview of Powers for the Provision of Retrospective Planning Approvals
File Ref: F17/29312; 13-1-10
Memorandum of the Director City Planning of 7 June 2017.
Delegation: Committee
That the information be received and noted.
|
Item No. 9.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 152 |
|
1/5/2017 |
|
Memorandum: Lord Mayor
Deputy Lord Mayor
Aldermen
Response to Question Without Notice
Tax on Vacant Properties
Meeting: City Planning Committee
|
Meeting date: 14 March 2017
|
Raised by: Alderman Cocker |
Question:
Vancouver and Melbourne have either introduced or in the process of introducing taxes on premises vacant for more than six months. How many premises in the Hobart City Council municipality were vacant for at least six months in 2016? Compared to the previous three years (2013-2015), has the vacancy rate increased in the HCC municipality? It would be appreciated if this could be broken down by number of vacant premises per calendar year.
Response:
Council does not keep or collect data on the number of vacant properties in the City. Property owners are under no obligation to advise Council when their property is left vacant for an extended period of time.
One method to ascertain the number of vacant properties is to analyse water consumption on the basis that if no water or a very small amount is used for an extended period then the property is likely to be vacant.
TasWater have been able to supply water consumption data for residential properties in the City of Hobart which show that for 2 consecutive quarters in 2015/16 144 properties used no water and in 2016/17 166 properties used no water. In 2015/16 a further 507 properties used less than 100 litres per day and in 2016/17 546 used less than 100 litres per day.
The average daily consumption of a house in Hobart is 590 litres so consumption of less than 100 litres per day may indicate that the property is vacant but has leaking pipes or dripping taps. It is not possible to be definitive about this however.
TasWater does not have reliable consumption data prior to 2015 and based on the 2015/16 and 2016/17 data it is not possible to show any trends although there was an increase in the number of properties with no or low consumption for an extended period.
The 144 and 166 properties that used no water are 0.92% and 1.06% respectively of the 15574 metered residential properties. Note however that this is not all of the dwellings in Hobart as some apartment complexes only have a single water meter.
In Victoria the vacant residential property tax proposed to be introduced by state legislation, provides that liability for the vacant residential property tax is self-reporting. That is, property owners are expected to inform the State Revenue Office when their property triggers the tax. The State Revenue Office will also undertake monitoring and compliance activities.
As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.
Neil Noye Director City Planning |
|
Date: 7 June 2017
File Reference: F17/29303; 13-1-10
Item No. 9.2 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 154 |
|
1/5/2017 |
|
Memorandum: Lord Mayor
Deputy Lord Mayor
Aldermen
Response to Question Without Notice
Overview of Powers for the Provision of Retrospective Planning Approvals
Meeting: City Planning Committee
|
Meeting date: 14 March 2017
|
Raised by: Alderman Reynolds |
Question:
What is the legal basis for allowing retrospective compliance? For example, in the case of 24 - 26 Weld Street where it was found that the Department of Education did not produce a site contamination report prior to building. How is it possible to retrospectively comply if it wasn’t done prior to building?
Response:
The main emphasis of the enforcement provisions in the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993 is on obtaining compliance.
Under section 63(3) Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993 it is an offence to fail to comply with a condition of a planning permit. Council has two enforcement options available. It can issue an infringement notice or commence a prosecution. This action punishes the person who has failed to comply with a planning permit but does not require the breach to be rectified. This action is most appropriate where an offence has been committed and is not continuing, for example, illegal demolition of a building.
The second option is to issue an Enforcement Notice under the provisions of the Act. An Enforcement Notice is a legislative mechanism to ensure use or development is in accordance with the applicable planning scheme or permit.
Under section 65D(2)(e) of the Act an enforcement notice can require that a person do, or not do, an act, so as to ensure that development carried out by the person on land is in accordance with a State Policy, permit, special permit or planning scheme, that applies to the land.
Even if use and/or development was commenced in breach of a condition, rectification of that breach ensures that as from the date of rectification the uses and developments complying with the permit are lawful. There is nothing in the relevant provisions which prohibits subsequent compliance with a planning permit. In fact, Section 65D(2)(e) of the Act contemplates the circumstances where a use or development has been commenced in breach of a planning permit condition but provides a mechanism for achieving rectification of that breach.
As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.
Neil Noye Director City Planning |
|
Date: 7 June 2017
File Reference: F17/29312; 13-1-10
|
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 156 |
|
13/6/2017 |
|
Section 29 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015.
File Ref: 13-1-10
An Alderman may ask a question without notice of the Chairman, another Alderman, the General Manager or the General Manager’s representative, in line with the following procedures:
1. The Chairman will refuse to accept a question without notice if it does not relate to the Terms of Reference of the Council committee at which it is asked.
2. In putting a question without notice, an Alderman must not:
(i) offer an argument or opinion; or
(ii) draw any inferences or make any imputations – except so far as may be necessary to explain the question.
3. The Chairman must not permit any debate of a question without notice or its answer.
4. The Chairman, Aldermen, General Manager or General Manager’s representative who is asked a question may decline to answer the question, if in the opinion of the respondent it is considered inappropriate due to its being unclear, insulting or improper.
5. The Chairman may require a question to be put in writing.
6. Where a question without notice is asked and answered at a meeting, both the question and the response will be recorded in the minutes of that meeting.
7. Where a response is not able to be provided at the meeting, the question will be taken on notice and
(i) the minutes of the meeting at which the question is asked will record the question and the fact that it has been taken on notice.
(ii) a written response will be provided to all Aldermen, at the appropriate time.
(iii) upon the answer to the question being circulated to Aldermen, both the question and the answer will be listed on the agenda for the next available ordinary meeting of the committee at which it was asked, where it will be listed for noting purposes only.
|
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 157 |
|
13/6/2017 |
|