Agenda of Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Item No. 6.1

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 8

11/5/2017

REPORT TITLE: 2017-2018 Fees and Charges - Parks and City Amenity Division - Open Space Group, Parks and Recreation, Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre

REPORT PROVIDED BY: Director Parks and City Amenity

1. Report Purpose and Community Benefit

1.1. The purpose of this report is to seek approval of the proposed fees and charges applicable to the Parks and City Amenity Division’s Open Space Group; Parks and Recreation and the Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre (DKHAC) for the 2017-2018 financial year.

2. Report Summary

2.1. Pursuant to section 205 of the Local Government Act 1993, the Council may impose fees and charges for various services.

2.2. The attached schedules detail the proposed fees and charges for the following activities for the 2017-2018 financial year:

2.2.1. Open Space Group (Visitor Services) (refer Attachment A).

2.2.2. Parks and Recreation (refer Attachment B).

2.2.3. Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre (refer Attachment C).

3. Recommendation

That the schedule of fees and charges for the 2017-2018 financial year, as referenced below and attached to the report, be approved.

1. Open Space Group (Attachment A)

2. Parks and Recreation (Attachment B)

3. Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre (Attachment C)

4. Background

4.1. The fees and charges for the Parks and City Amenity’s Open Space Group, Parks and Recreation and the Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre Units for the 2017-2018 financial year have been assessed.

5. Proposal and Implementation

5.1. It is proposed that the attached schedules of fees and charges for the 2017-2018 financial year be approved.

Open Space Group (Visitor Services)

5.2. Minor increases to most fees are in line with CPI and market relativity.

5.3. A small number of new charges are proposed, as indicated below:

5.4. Waterworks Reserve Sites

Introduction of a 50% surcharge for those uses with a commercial purpose. The previous fee structure did not clearly accommodate such uses, causing some confusion to hirers.

5.5. Dorney House

Introduction of a fee specifically for weddings that is consistent with the fee applied for the use of St David’s Park Rotunda.

5.6. Bush Adventures

A minor decrease in budgeted Bush Adventures income of $2,000 is anticipated, due to an expected lower level of activity.

5.7. Healthy Hobart Program of Activities

Introduction of a fee structure, consistent with the structure applied to the City’s Bush Adventures program, that provides an opportunity to recoup some expenses, coupled with the recognition that the program supports healthy programs for the wider Hobart community.

5.8. Commercial Guided Walking/Cycling Tours

Introduction of a fee structure, consistent with the fee/licence structure applied for commercial exercise classes in the City’s parks and reserves.

The fee returns revenue to the City whilst recognising the City marketing aspect of the tours, in showcasing the City’s quality parks and reserves open spaces.

5.9. Overall, revenue is anticipated to decrease by $2,000 or -5.3%.

Parks and Recreation
(Parks and Reserves Management)

5.10. Minor increases to most fees are in line with CPI and market relativity.

5.11. A small number of other amendments proposed to remain consistent with the Open Space fee structure.

5.12. Soldiers Memorial Oval Play Space (to be constructed)

Construction of a new play space adjacent to Soldiers Memorial Oval, Queens Domain, including a pavilion with wood fired ovens, BBQ shelters and open BBQ areas is scheduled to commence in the first half 2017.

A new fee structure is proposed for the facilities, which generally align with the arrangements in place at the Waterworks Reserve.

5.13. Overall, revenue is anticipated to increase by $22,400 or 27%.

Parks and Recreation
(Recreation and Projects (Sporting Facilities) Management)

5.14. Minor increases to most fees are in line with CPI to offset the increasing costs of ground preparation.

5.15. The utilisation of the City’s sporting grounds remains close to capacity. The City continues to invest heavily in these community assets, including improved lighting, drainage, irrigation and surfacing works, and close consultation with key users groups to ensure grounds remain suitably maintained during arduous sporting sessions. Every opportunity is made to cater to both long standing users and creating opportunities for new or casual hirers.

5.16. Overall, revenue is anticipated to increase by $20,000 or 5%.

Parks and Recreation
(Mornington Skills Centre)

5.17. Minor increases to fees are in line with CPI.

5.18. Utilisation by external hirers of which a charge is raised is down on estimates. However, internal use of which fees are not charged, remain high.

5.19. Revenue is anticipated to decrease by $4,000 or 28%.

Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre

5.20. Minor increases to most fees are in line with CPI and market relativity.

5.21. Improvements to the physical fabric and core plant to operate the Centre continues to be implemented.

5.22. The Master Plan for the redevelopment of the Centre is to be considered by the Parks and Recreation Committee on 11 May 2017.

5.23. Revenue is anticipated to increase by a total of $127,350 or 3.2%.

6. Strategic Planning and Policy Considerations

6.1. The annual review of the City’s fees and charges contributes to the Capital City Strategic Plan 2015-2025 - Goal 5 – “Governance, Leadership provides for informed decision-making for our capital city”.

7. Financial Implications

7.1. Funding Source and Impact on Current Year Operating Result

7.1.1. Not applicable

7.2. Impact on Future Years’ Financial Result

7.2.1. The review of the fees and charges for the Division’s Open Space Group; Parks and Recreation and the Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre has been undertaken and expected increases/decreases for the 2017-2018 financial year for each function area is expected as follows:

Function Area	2016-017 Budget	2017-18 BUDGET	Increase / (Decrease)
Open Space (Visitor Services)	$39,000	$37,000	($2,000)	(5.3%)
Parks & Reserves Management	$82,600	$105,000	$22,400	27%
Recreation and Projects (Sporting Facilities) Management	$383,000	$403,000	$20,000	5%
Mornington Skills Centre	$14,000	$10,000	($4,000)	(28%)
DKHAC	$3.9M	$4.1M	$127,350	3.2%

8. Legal, Risk and Legislative Considerations

8.1. Pursuant to section 205 of the Local Government Act 1993, Council may impose fees and charges for various services.

9. Delegation

9.1. This matter is delegated to the Council

As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.

Glenn Doyle

Director Parks and City Amenity

Date: 5 May 2017

File Reference: F17/35557

Attachment a: Open Space Group ⇩

Attachment b: Parks and Recreation ⇩

Attachment c: Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre ⇩

Item No. 6.2

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 37

11/5/2017

REPORT TITLE: Royal Tasmanian Botanical Gardens - Annual Grant - 2016/2017

REPORT PROVIDED BY: Executive Officer Parks and City Amenity

Group Manager Open Space

Director Parks and City Amenity

1. Report Purpose and Community Benefit

1.1. This report seeks approval for the payment of the annual grant to the Royal Tasmanian Botanical Gardens (RTBG) for the 2016/2017 financial year.

2. Report Summary

2.1. The City provides an annual grant to the Royal Tasmanian Botanical Gardens usually in the order of $12,000.

2.2. In 2015/2016, a contribution of $12,000 plus an additional $13,000 was provided in support of works relating to the 40^th Anniversary of the Sister City Relationship with Yaizu.

2.3. For 2016/2017, the Gardens has requested consideration of a $33,000 (exc gst) grant to assist in three projects and related works in support and in preparation of the Gardens’ bicentennial program in 2018.

3. Recommendation

That:

1. The payment of $12,000 (exc gst), as the annual grant to the Royal Tasmanian Botanical Gardens (RTBG), be approved and funded from the Parks and City Amenity Divisional Budget Function within the 2016/2017 Annual Plan.

2. An additional one-off grant contribution of $21,000 (exc gst) be approved to fund projects attributed to the bicentenary of the Gardens in 2018.

3. The additional $21,000 be funded from underspent budgeted material and services expenditure within the Parks and City Amenity budget functions in the 2016/17 Annual Plan.

4. The RTBG acknowledge the City’s contribution in relevant promotional material.

5. The grant provision of $33,000 be recorded in the ‘Grants, Assistance and Benefits Provided’ section of the City of Hobart’s Annual Report.

4. Background

4.1. The RTBG cover an area of approximately 34.6 acres and was established in 1818. Next year is the bicentennial of the Gardens with a significant program being undertaken.

4.2. The Gardens hold historic plant collections and a large number of significant trees, many dating back to the nineteenth century.

4.3. The Gardens over 450,000 visitors per year, with a 15% jump in visitation over the last two years.

4.4. The RTBG plays an important role in the life and wellbeing of the City through the promotion of a range of community events and education programs and as an iconic destination within the City.

4.5. The City has paid an annual grant to the Royal Tasmanian Botanical Gardens for many years with the grant usually indexed by CPI annually.

4.6. In accordance with previous years, the grant is usually paid in the last quarter of the financial year.

2015/2016 Grant Funding

4.7. In 2015/2016, the City provided grant funding of $25,000 (exc gst) to support two projects:

4.7.1. The Japanese Garden Project – part of the Yaizu Sister City 40th Anniversary - $20,000 exc gst

4.7.2. RTBG 2018 Bicentenary– Heritage Front Gates – initiation of works to develop the area around the Garden’s heritage front gates with the aim of improving the visitor experience, as part of the 2018 bicentenary of the Gardens - $5,000 exc gst

4.8. The City’s usual annual grant is in the order of $12,000 however the Council, at its meeting held on 20 June 2016 resolved inter alia:

The Council approve the payment of $12,000 exc gst, as its annual grant to the Royal Tasmanian Botanical Gardens

The Council provide an additional one-off grant contribution of $13,000 exc gst, in recognition of the strong connection of the proposed works on the Japanese Garden Project with the 40th anniversary of the City’s Sister City relationship with Yaizu.

4.9. The Gardens have provided a closure report on the outcomes of last year’s grant (refer Attachment A).

4.9.1. In summary, the City’s funding allowed for improvements to infrastructure, including replacement of the Yatsuhashi Bridge, resurfacing of 50% of the pathways throughout the garden, installation of an improved drainage system to the ‘Wedding Lawn’ and structural work to stabilise the Tea House.

2016/2017 Grant Funding Request

4.10. With the Gardens entering its bicentennial year in 2018, a significant program is proposed.

4.11. The Gardens are subsequently requesting consideration of a grant package of $33,000 (+gst), attributed to the following projects:

4.11.1. $12,000

To assist in achieving significant enhancement of living collections with a focus on enhanced floral displays.

4.11.2. $15,000

To undertake major upgrade to essential visitor amenities (mainly the public toilets).

4.11.3. $6,000

To assist with the Bicentenary Program including installation of a ‘200’ feature piece within the Gardens for the duration of the year and related aspects of the program.

4.12. With only $12,000 currently attributed in the City’s budget for the annual grant, the additional $21,000 requested would be funded from underspent budgeted material and services expenditure within the Parks and City Amenity budget functions in the 2016/2017 Annual Plan.

5. Proposal and Implementation

5.1. It is proposed that the City provide $12,000 (exc gst), to the RTBG as part of its annual committed grant for 2016/2017.

5.2. It is proposed that the City provide an additional one-off grant contribution of $21,000 (exc gst), to fund the grant request detailed above.

5.2.1. The additional contribution be funded from underspent budgeted material and services expenditure within the Parks and City Amenity budget functions in the 2016/2017 Annual Plan.

6. Strategic Planning and Policy Considerations

6.1. The provision of the grant is consistent with the City’s Capital City Strategic Plan 2015-2025 Strategic Plan, specifically

Strategic Objective 1.4 – An enriched visitor experience

Strategic Objective 2.4 – Unique heritage assets are protected and celebrated

Strategic Objective 3.3 – A highly valued natural and cultural open space network

6.2. The application accords with a number of collaborative initiatives as outlined in the City’s memorandum of understanding with the RTBG.

7. Financial Implications

7.1. Funding Source and Impact on Current Year Operating Result

7.1.1. A funding allocation of $12,000 (exc gst) for the annual committed grant remains available in the Parks and City Amenity Divisional Budget Function (160) within the 2016/2017 Annual Plan.

7.1.2. The additional $21,000 be funded from underspent budgeted material and services expenditure within the Parks and City Amenity budget functions in the 2016/2017 Annual Plan.

7.2. Impact on Future Years’ Financial Result

7.2.1. Not applicable

7.3. Asset Related Implications

7.3.1. Not applicable

8. Social and Customer Considerations

8.1. The Gardens are an important part of the fabric of the City and the southern Tasmanian region and is visited and utilised by local, intrastate, interstate and international visitors alike.

9. Marketing and Media

9.1. The grant is subject to the RTBG acknowledging the City’s contribution in relevant promotional material.

9.2. The grant provision is to be recorded in the ‘Grants, Assistance and Benefits Provided’ section of the City of Hobart’s Annual Report.

10. Delegation

10.1. The matter rests with the Council.

Adrian Roth

Executive Officer Parks and City Amenity

Robert Mather

Group Manager Open Space

Glenn Doyle

Director Parks and City Amenity

Date: 5 May 2017

File Reference: F17/40969; 25-1-28

Attachment a: Grant Submission - Royal Tasmanian Botanical Gardens ⇩

Item No. 6.3

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 48

11/5/2017

REPORT TITLE: Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre Redevelopment Master Plan - Results of Community Engagement and Endorsement of Final Master Plan

REPORT PROVIDED BY: Manager Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre

Director Parks and City Amenity

1. Purpose and Community Benefit

1.1. The purpose of this report is to seek final approval of the Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre Redevelopment Master Plan 2017 following recent community engagement feedback.

2. Report Summary

2.1. The Council, at its meeting held on 20 February 2017, endorsed the Draft Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre (DKHAC) Redevelopment Master Plan for release for community wide comment and feedback.

2.2. The document was released to the public for a 5 week period resulting in receipt of 229 comments and suggestions.

2.3. The Master Plan proposes a redevelopment of the Centre with a total cost of $22M.

2.3.1. $12M of the works is to be funded by the City and focusses on improvements to access, change rooms, increase to gym and fitness rooms, the café and staff areas.

2.3.2. $10M expansion of the Centre is reliant on external funding that will allow for the a new waterslide, children’s play area, new warm water pool, new wellness centre, school group change area, improved car parking, a new dry diving space, renewal of pool deck tiles and other improvements to the building.

2.4. A grant application for $10M through the Australian Government Building Better Regions Fund Infrastructure Projects Stream has been submitted with advice on the success of the application expected to be announced late-June 2017.

3. Recommendation

That:

1. The Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre Redevelopment Master Plan, dated May 2017 and marked at Attachment B to the report, be approved.

2. Implementation of the Master Plan be undertaken in accordance with the City’s 10 Year Capital Works Program and receipt of grant funding.

3. Respondents to the public exhibition of the master plan be notified of the Council’s resolution and key refinements to the plan.

4. The General Manager be authorised to lodge development applications to enable implementation of the approved master plan.

4. Background

4.1. The Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre (DKHAC) is a heavily utilised facility which is 21 years old and is due for refurbishment.

4.2. As previously reported, initial planning was undertaken to establish the most practical and cost effective way in which the Centre could be improved.

4.3. Improvements to the Centre are proposed to be progressed in two ways.

Refurbishment

4.3.1. There is a significant body of work required to address existing infrastructure within the Centre. This work includes the following:

4.3.1.1. The refurbishment of the plant room and associated mechanical systems.

4.3.1.2. Refurbishment and renewal of the toilets and change rooms.

4.3.1.3. Improved access into the Centre which will also involve the relocation of the entrance and refurbishment of the Cafe.

4.3.1.4. Refurbishment and/ or new spa, sauna and steam room.

Redevelopment

4.3.2. The second element of the work involves the provision of a new warm water therapy pool and water slide. This work will not be undertaken unless external funding is secured.

4.4. The Draft Master Plan was released to the public for a 5 week period resulting in receipt of 229 comments and suggestions.

4.5. Promotion of the Draft Plan included:

· presence on the City’s website,

· promotion via the YourSayHobart portal,

· The Mercury advertising,

· promotion via the City’s and the Centre’s Facebook pages,

· an onsite display with feedback forms at the Centre,

· meetings with the City’s Access Advisory Committee and representatives of the Glebe Residents Association and other local residents, and

· direct invitations for feedback from the Centre’s user groups.

4.6. A collation of submissions received are detailed in Attachment A to the report, together with Officer assessment of the feedback.

4.7. The review of the feedback received has helped inform minor changes to the Draft Plan, as summarised below:

Feedback Summary

4.8. A new indoor cafe with updating of the pool side cafe.

4.8.1. There was support for this approach particularly from people wanting to stay at the centre after using it and not wanting the noise or the humidity of the pool area.

4.8.2. The design of the centre now has an air lock between the pool deck and the cafe which will reduce noise and humidity.

4.8.3. An opening door to the footpath will be considered due to feedback that is summer people would like to have an outdoor component to the cafe.

4.9. A new staircase and lift to accommodate stretchers and large wheelchairs.

4.9.1. The lift has been given significant support especially increasing the size of the lift to enable wheelchairs to be turned around within the lift.

4.10. New aquatic change facilities in the “change village setup” and pool deck showers.

4.10.1. The new change facilities have been given significant support due to the limitations of the current facilities.

4.10.2. The removal of the members change facilities on the pool deck has received negative feedback from aquatic members as they will now be using the upgraded change facilities on the pool deck.

The option to have dedicated aquatic members’ change rooms were considered however space is not available and most modern facilities do not have these in place.

There will be however aquatic members’ lockers on the pool deck.

4.11. Access directly off the car park via a bridge to a new level entry with a walk through retail area.

4.11.1. Significant positive feedback in relation to the bridge access

4.12. An increased size gym, with two group fitness rooms, consult rooms and a spin classroom.

4.12.1. Positive feedback about the increase in the group fitness room space and new spin room which will provide greater variety of classes to members.

4.13. One group fitness room with have outdoor access to a functional training area.

4.13.1. Positive feedback on this change.

4.14. One group fitness room will be multi-purpose for childcare/personal training and user groups use.

4.14.1. Positive feedback on this change.

4.15. New gym change rooms on the first floor for Gold members.

4.15.1. Significant positive feedback about the new change rooms next to the gym area.

4.16. Improved staff administration and amenities area.

4.16.1. The staff area will now comply with modern work place requirements for staff and provide a staff room large enough to accommodate the number of staff.

4.17. A new retrofitted spa in the current area.

4.17.1. It has been decided to retro fit the existing spa area with a new container spa given the significant number of complaints that the centre receives about the current spas which cannot be fixed due to the way they were installed.

This will be completed as part of the City’s funded works.

4.18. A new user pays, external, enclosed water slide.

4.18.1. Significant support for the new slide

4.19. A new zero depth splash pad children’s play area.

4.19.1. Significant support for the new children’s play area

4.20. A new accessible warm water pool, heated 36°C which includes the spas.

4.20.1. Two accessible change rooms have been added to the warm water pool area to be accessed directly off the pool deck.

4.20.2. Consideration is being given to the installation of noise reduction panels for the wellness area.

4.21. A new wellness sauna and steam room area.

4.21.1. Significant support for these due to the age and condition of the current sauna, spa and steam rooms.

4.22. A new school group change area to assist with teacher supervision of students.

4.22.1. Significant support from the schools who currently use the Centre for school learn to swim and this assists the teachers with student supervision and safety.

4.23. Improved car parking facilities.

4.23.1. The car park has received the most comments as part of the survey with the size of the current car parking spaces receiving the most comment.

A traffic engineer is engaged to explore options for changes to the car park and the surrounding area of the Centre.

4.23.2. The link of the proposed Tasman Highway pedestrian bridge from the Regatta Ground car park to the Centre will assist with parking for significant events.

4.23.3. The new Brooker Bridge will assist in getting customers from the city to the Centre.

4.24. New dry diving space to allow for national diving competitions and use for supervised children’s parties.

4.24.1. Diving Tasmania fully supports the building of the dry diving room. The centre has worked with Diving Tasmania and now offers diving classes as part of the centres learn to swim program.

4.25. Renewal of pool deck tiles in traffic areas.

4.25.1. The tiles are due for replacement in the near future and there were comments in support of getting tiles with more traction.

4.26. Swimming Lane Availability

4.26.1. There were quite a few comments in relation to the Centre not increasing the size of the 50m pool from 8 – 10 lanes.

This decision was clearly documented in the master plan redevelopment document as to why the City would not be considering this option.

5. Proposal and Implementation

5.1. This report proposes the endorsement of the DKHAC Redevelopment Master Plan 2017 with some minor changes as identified through the community consultation process.

6. Strategic Planning and Policy Considerations

6.1. The redevelopment of the Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre aligns with Strategic Objective 4.2 of the City’s Strategic Plan 2015-2025:

Develop and maintain the Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre.

7. Financial Implications

7.1. Funding Source and Impact on Current Year Operating Result

7.1.1. Physical improvements at the Centre (which has an annual turnover of $5M) will help ensure the future sustainable operation of the facility and avoid the need for operational subsidisation by the City.

7.1.2. The City’s 10 Year Capital Works Program includes $12M.

7.1.3. An application for grant funding of an amount of $10M was lodged with the Australian Government Building Better Regions Fund Infrastructure Projects Stream on the 28 February 2017. The City will be advised in late June if it has been successful.

7.2. Asset Related Implications

7.2.1. The majority of the refurbishment works are asset replacement. The redevelopment component to be funded by the grant funding (if secured) will be new asset and will result in the need to fund increased depreciation.

8. Legal, Risk and Legislative Considerations

8.1. Refurbishment of the Centre will help mitigate risk associated with the extensive community usage of the facility and bring it in line with contemporary requirements.

8.2. Redevelopment of the Centre will require the usual statutory planning, building and plumbing approvals.

9. Environmental Considerations

9.1. Redevelopment of the Centre takes advantage of environmentally effective technology.

10. Social and Customer Considerations

10.1. Refurbishment of the Centre is desperately needed to help meet the needs of members and the customers who use the facility. As detailed in earlier reports, the Centre is now 21 years old and fails in many respects to meet contemporary user expectations.

10.2. The redevelopment will facilitate community participation in aquatic and wellness activities, particularly for those of mature age, those with accessibility and rehabilitation needs.

10.3. The redevelopment includes expanded recreational, aquatic and gymnasium facilities to retain relevance.

10.4. Investigation is currently underway to create a temporary entry to the centre for a 12 month period which will comply with disability access requirements.

11. Community and Stakeholder Engagement

11.1. A community and stakeholder engagement Plan was developed with the following being undertaken:

11.1.1. presence on the City’s website,

11.1.2. promotion via the YourSayHobart portal,

11.1.3. The Mercury advertising,

11.1.4. promotion via the City’s and the Centre’s Facebook pages,

11.1.5. an onsite display with feedback forms at the Centre,

11.1.6. meetings with the City’s Access Advisory Committee and representatives of the Glebe Residents Association and other local residents, and

11.1.7. direct invitations for feedback from the Centre’s user groups.

12. Delegation

12.1. This is a matter for the Council to consider.

Sue Buckland

Susan Buckland

Manager Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre

Glenn Doyle

Director Parks and City Amenity

Date: 5 May 2017

File Reference: F17/15664; 33-21-13

Attachment a: Summary of Submissions Received ⇩

Attachment b: DKHAC Redevelopment Master Plan - May 2017 ⇩

Item No. 6.4

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 141

11/5/2017

REPORT TITLE: Fern Tree Park Visitor Node Master Plan, Wellington Park - Results of Community Engagement and Endorsement of Final Master Plan

REPORT PROVIDED BY: Senior Park Planner

Group Manager Open Space

Director Parks and City Amenity

1. Report Purpose and Community Benefit

1.1. The purpose of this report is to present the results of community engagement on the Draft Fern Tree Park Visitor Node Master Plan – Wellington Park and to seek endorsement of the final Master Plan.

1.2. The implementation of the Master Plan will improve the visitor infrastructure of the local park at Fern Tree as an entrance into Wellington Park and the Pipeline Track.

2. Report Summary

2.1. This report presents the results of community engagement on the Draft Fern Tree Park Visitor Node Master Plan undertaken in November-December 2016.

2.2. Fern Tree Park possesses significant challenges for planning for new visitor infrastructure due to its location and topography. Due to these site challenges, one of the key recommendations presented in the draft master plan was to remove the aging toilet from the park and construct a new fully accessible toilet facility and pubic car park across the Huon Road in the Fern Tree Tavern’ car park.

2.3. Twenty-six (26) submissions were received during public exhibition with 20 clearly opposing the proposal to relocate of the toilet out of the park. In response to these concerns, further investigations were undertaken to find an acceptable solution in the park that considered access, sustainable wastewater management, and the sites values and constraints.

2.4. As a result of these investigations the final master plan has been amended recommending the development of a new toilet at the Metro bus shelter between Huon Road and the Pipeline Track.

2.5. The other main issues commented on included the safety of park visitors traversing the Huon Road crossing; the proposal to reduce the speed limit to 40km/hr to decrease this risk; improving wayfinding and signage for park visitors; Fern Glade Entry car park design concerns; and St Raphael’s Church access.

2.6.
All submissions and issues of concern were assessed and summarised with recommended responses presented in Attachment A. The master plan has been amended and is presented for the Council’s consideration and approval (Attachment B).

2.7. The draft master plan works were previously estimated to cost $1,100,000. This figure will require review with the amended plan recommending a different toilet location and design.

2.8. One million dollars has been allocated in the 10 year capital works program: $750,000 in 2017-2018 and $250,000 in 2018-2019. A further $100,000 will be required to implement the master plan fully with potential external funding sources for the road and traffic works. 3. Recommendation

That:

1. The Fern Tree Park Visitor Node Master Plan – Wellington Park, dated April 2017 and marked as Attachment B to the report, be endorsed.

2. Staged implementation of the master plan be undertaken in accordance with the City’s 10 year Capital Works Program allocations of $750,000 in 2017/18 and $250,000 in 2018/2019.

3. External funding sources be pursued for the estimated $100,000 of road and traffic works.

4. Respondents to the public exhibition of the master plan, including the operator of the Fern Tree Tavern, be notified of the Council’s resolution and the key amendments to the plans.

5. The General Manager be authorised to lodge development applications, as required, to enable implementation of the approved master plan to be progressed.

6. The Wellington Park Management Trust be advised of the Council’s decision.

4. Background

4.1. On 24 October 2016 the Council endorsed the release of the Draft Fern Tree Park Visitor Node Master Plan – Wellington Park for a four week period of community engagement.

4.2. The following report provides details of feedback received during public exhibition, and presents the amended and final Master Plan.

The Master Plan

4.3. The master plan, prepared by Inspiring Place, provides the City of Hobart and Wellington Park Management Trust (WPMT) with the strategic direction to guide the future use, development and management of the Fern Tree Park Visitor Node area.

The study area includes Fern Tree Park, Fern Tree Bower, Silver Falls, the Fern Glade Quarry Car Park and the network of tracks that connect these sites.

4.4. Fern Tree Park possesses significant challenges due to its location positioned on a steep south facing forested slope in Wellington Park above Huon Road opposite the Fern Tree village.

Visitors to the park either drive, bus, walk or cycle to this location to either use the local park facilities, to access the broader Wellington Park trail network or Pinnacle Track.

The park entrance cannot be accessed easily as visitors are required to cross Huon Road from Stephenson Place at a high risk location, or walk along the road edge from Fern Glade Quarry Carpark.

The park’s heritage and natural values and proximity to the Pipeline Track (which houses Hobart’s drinking water pipes) also contribute to the issues in defining the direction for the area.

4.5. The draft master plan that was approved by Council for public exhibition in October 2016 endeavoured to address these issues. All recommendations were presented via four concept plans: for Fern Tree Park, Fern Glade Entry Carpark, and Fern Tavern Carpark and the balance of the study area.

4.6. Due to the site challenges, one of the key recommendations in the draft master plan was to remove the aging toilet from the park and construct a new toilet facility and pubic car park across the Huon Road in the Fern Tree Tavern car park.

Public exhibition – summary of results

4.7. A range of methods were used to inform stakeholders, community and park users of the draft master plan. These included:

· Letters to stakeholders.

· Public notice in ‘The Mercury’.

· Park based and Fern Tree community based temporary signage.

· City of Hobart website, ‘Your Say’ site and social media.

· On site community walk and talk attended by 12 residents.

· Additional consultation with TasWater and Metro.

4.8. The City’s ‘Your Say’ Hobart community engagement platform was visited 502 times during the public exhibition period; 290 participants downloaded a document and 14 participants lodged a submission through this platform.

4.9. Some respondents lodged their submissions through other means resulting in 26 submissions received in total. Five of the submissions were received from groups: Fern Tree Community Association, St Raphael’s Church, Metro Tasmania, Aboriginal Heritage Tasmania, Hobart Walking Club.

4.10. Attachment A summarises the issues and concerns outlined in the submissions received and conveyed at the community walk and talk.

4.11. It is noted that preliminary consultation was undertaken with key stakeholder groups prior to the preparation of the draft master plan; nine (9) of the submissions therefore responded positively to the overall direction of the master plan.

4.12. However, there was strong community and stakeholder opposition to the recommendation to relocate the park toilet to the Fern Tree Tavern car park with 20 respondents opposed.

The main stated concern was locating the toilet out of the park some 100 metres distant and across a high risk road crossing with poor site lines.

4.13. Related to this issue, 16 respondents conveyed concerns about the safety of people, particularly children, having to cross Huon Road and then potentially walk through a car park to reach the toilets; and 6 requested that the speed limit on Huon Road be reduced to 40km/hr through the Fern Tree visitor hub.

4.14. Some other major issues of concern included:

§ The need for improved wayfinding and signage for visitors to the park (7);

§ the proposal to redesign of the upgraded Fern Glade Entry Car Park and the potential of reducing parking spaces (4);

§ the need to accommodate the needs of cyclists (4)

§ St Raphael’s Church congregation requesting greater consideration of their needs for improved access to the church(4)

§ the need to retain and protect vegetation of value (trees, rhododendrons) in the park (3);

Response to key concerns

4.15. Submissions were reviewed by the project management team. Recommended responses to the issues commented on and proposed amendments to the master plan are outlined in Attachment A. These are summarised and discussed below.

Toilet location

4.16. As a consequence of the strong community opposition to the draft master plan’s proposal to relocate the toilet to the Tavern car park, Council officers undertook further investigations, exploring a range of scenarios to find an acceptable solution for a new toilet that is park based and considers access, sustainable wastewater management, safety, and the sites values and constraints.

Access and wastewater consultants were once again engaged to consider the challenges posed for upgrading facilities in this park.

4.17. As a result of these investigations it is proposed to locate a pump out toilet next to the Pipeline Track in the road reserve at the bus stop on Huon Road.

4.18. The proposal is to construct a double storied structure that will blend in with the Fern Tree landscape with a pump out tank integrated into an enclosed bus shelter and 2-3 toilets to be located on the roof that would be accessed from the Pipeline Track.

4.18.1. The proposed toilet facility will not provide universal access as this cannot be achieved, but it will provide assisted access for Pipeline Track and Fern Tee Park visitors and those accessing the broader track network of Wellington Park.

This outcome was considered to be an acceptable outcome by access consultant Michael Small.

4.18.2. TasWater was also consulted due to the close proximity of the proposal to the water pipelines and has provided in principle support.

Metro also supports this proposal.

4.18.3. It minimises loss of vegetation, potential contamination of the drinking water supply, is close to the park, and provides the best assisted access solution for park users.

Traffic and safety

4.19. Fern Tree Park is in a challenging location perched above Huon Road opposite the Fern Tree village where many visitors park or arrive by Metro bus from the City.

Traversing the road crossing is really only safe in one location from the Tavern carpark where site lines can be gained from both directions.

4.20. Reviewing the proposal to relocate the toilet back to the park may alleviate the concerns conveyed by many respondents about increased risk of pedestrians being hit by vehicles.

There is still however some level of risk as it is the primary crossing point for visitors who park in Stephenson’s Place and the Tavern car park.

4.21. There were a number of respondents who requested the speed limit be reduced down to 40km/hr rather than the 50km/hr recommended in the plan.

The Manager Traffic Engineering has advised the recommended 50km/hr reduction will require the approval of State Growth and that a 40km/hr reduction would be unlikely to receive approval.

4.22. Building the proposed new formalised footpath and additional safety features between the Fern Glade Entry car park and the park will provide a safer and formalised path of travel between these two locations also improve the safety of visitors currently at risk when using this informal route.

Wayfinding and signage

4.23. Entry signs to the upgraded park that includes links to the Wellington Park trail network and the Pipeline Track will be included in the implementation of park works.

4.24. The provision of wayfinding information at the bus stop and Tavern is a broader Wellington Park visitor services issue.

The preparation of a visitor services strategy by the Wellington Park Management Trust is programmed to commence in the coming financial year.

Fern Glade Entry Carpark

4.25. The proposed upgrading of the Fern Glade Entry Carpark is to be designed in accordance with current standards for the design of car parks and car parking spaces.

4.26.
It is noted that it is proposed to increase in the car park footprint to improve its design, safety and layout.

However, as the current carpark currently has no defined spaces this proposal could result in a consequent reduction of spaces.

St Raphael’s Church

4.27. The congregation of St Raphael’s Church were hoping that the master plan would contain recommendations to improve access to St Raphael’s.

Even though St Raphael’s appears to form part of the park landscape, and its driveway forms part of the fire trail access through Fern Tree Park, the Church proper is located on a separate title and does not form part of the park.

It therefore was not included in the project scope.

Fern Tree Tavern Car Park

4.28. As stated in Section 4.16 the Draft Master Plan proposal to relocate the park toilet to the Tavern car park has been reviewed with the toilet now moved back into the Park.

4.29. The proposal to lease the rear of the Tavern property for the development of a small public car park for 12 additional spaces has been retained due to the increasing demand for visitor parking at peak times in the park.

4.30. During the preparation of the Draft Master Plan in-principle agreement was gained both from the licensee and owner of the Fern Tree Tavern for the toilet and car park proposal.

4.31. Details regarding the negotiation of a lease of the part of the Tavern property for the car park will be reported to the Council separately following final endorsement of the master plan.

Final Fern Tree Park Visitor Node Master Plan – Wellington Park

4.32. In response to the submissions received, the Draft Fern Tree Park Visitor Node Master Plan has been amended in accordance with the recommended responses contained in Attachment A. The final Master Plan is attached for Council’s consideration (Attachment B).

5.
Proposal and Implementation

5.1. It is proposed that the Fern Tree Park Visitor Node Master Plan – Wellington Park, as appended in Attachment B, be approved.

5.2. Following Council approval, the WPMT will be notified of the Council’s endorsement of the Master Plan.

5.3. Respondents will be notified of the Council’s resolution, and the key amendments to the Master Plan.

The final Master Plan will be made publically available through the City’s and WPMT’s websites.

5.4. It will be used to guide the City’s development and management of the park in the coming years with major works scheduled for implementation 2017-2018 and 2018-2019.

6. Strategic Planning and Policy Considerations

6.1. This proposal aligns with the Capital City Strategic Plan 2015-2025

Strategic Objective 2.2

A people focussed city with well designed and well managed urban and recreational spaces;

Action 2.2.2 Develop and, manage and maintain the city’s urban spaces and infrastructure.

Strategic Objective 3.3.

A highly valued natural and cultural open space network

Action 3.3.2 Implement park-based management and master plans.

Strategic Objective 5.4

An engaged civic culture where people feel part of decision making

Action 5.4.1 Implement best practice community engagement (IAP2) across the organisation

6.2.
The proposal also aligns with the Wellington Park Management Plan (2013) which identifies Fern Tree as a key entry and visitor node for Wellington Park, and includes the following recommended action:

Prior to the placement of new major infrastructure at key Park entry points and visitor nodes, prepare master plans that guide future development and management of visitor facilities in keeping with the area’s natural and cultural values.

As a minimum, master plans will be prepared for the following:

· Fern Tree Park and Fern Tree Bower;

· Junction Cabin; and

· The Chalet.

6.3. The City’s Public Toilet Strategy 2016 recommends construction of a new public toilet in Fern Tree Park programmed for 2017-2018.

7. Financial Implications

7.1. Funding Source and Impact on Current Year Operating Result

7.1.1. The total cost estimate for the implementation of the Draft Fern Tree Park Visitor Node Master Plan was $1.1M.

The cost for the previous toilet proposal in the Tavern car park was estimated to be $315,000.

A cost for the reviewed combined pump out toilet and bus stop has not yet been calculated but is anticipated to be similar to this previous estimate.

7.2. Impact on Future Years’ Financial Result

7.2.1. A total of $1M has been included in the City’s 10 year Capital Works Program.

7.2.2. $500,000 is allocated in the capital works program in 2017-2018 for the implementation of the Master Plan and $250,000 for a new Fern Tree Public Toilet.

A further $250,000 is allocated in 2018/2019 for the master plan.

7.2.3. This leaves a further $100,000 that will be required to implement the master plan fully.

Much of this cost relates to the road and traffic works.

Potential external funding sources exist for these works via the Vulnerable Road Users Program and Roads to Recovery Program.

These sources will be pursued and may be augmented by asset renewal funds in future years.

7.3. Asset Related Implications

7.3.1. Many of the assets in Fern Tree Park, Fern Glade Entry Car Park and balance study area are deteriorating with the combined toilets and picnic shelter, and playground programmed for replacement.

8. Legal, Risk and Legislative Considerations

8.1. Fern Tree Park is located in Wellington Park and therefore the plan must also be endorsed and approved by the Wellington Park Management Trust.

It is noted that the proposed toilet is located in the roadside and therefore outside of the Wellington Park boundaries.

8.2. Details regarding the negotiation of a legal agreement (lease or similar) for a car park to be located at the rear of the Fern Tree Tavern will be reported to the Council separately following final endorsement of the master plan

9. Environmental Considerations

9.1. Implementation of the master plan will be undertaken in accordance with the Wellington Park Management Plan, planning approvals, environmental management guidelines and standards.

10. Social and Customer Considerations

10.1. Due to the feedback received during community engagement and from key stakeholders, the master plans finalisation was delayed to allow for further review and detailed investigations for the public toilet to be retained in the park.

11. Community and Stakeholder Engagement

11.1. Details of the results of the community engagement are reported in Section 4 of this report.

11.2. The City’s Manager Traffic Engineering, Road Services Engineer and associated officers were also consulted regarding the proposed traffic management measure and road safety recommendations.

12.
Delegation

12.1. This matter is delegated to Council.

Jill Hickie

Senior Park Planner

Rob Mather

Robert Mather

Group Manager Open Space

Glenn Doyle

Director Parks and City Amenity

Date: 5 May 2017

File Reference: F17/40409

Attachment a: Summary of Issues - Draft Fern Tree Park Visitor Node Master Plan ⇩

Attachment b: Final Fern Tree Park Visitor Node Master Plan 2017 ⇩

Item No. 6.4

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting - 11/5/2017

Page 157

ATTACHMENT b

PDF Creator

Item No. 6.5

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 231

11/5/2017

REPORT TITLE: The Springs, kunanyi / Mount Wellington - Potential Visitor Centre - Pre-Feasibility

REPORT PROVIDED BY: Visitor Services Manager

Group Manager Open Space

Director Parks and City Amenity

1. Report Purpose and Community Benefit

1.1. The purpose of this report is to detail the outcomes of work commissioned to investigate the pre-feasibility of a City-funded visitor centre at The Springs on kunanyi / Mt Wellington.

2. Report Summary

2.1. The Council resolved on 19 September 2016 (in closed session) to authorise officers to commence planning and development of a City-funded visitor centre at The Springs.

2.2. Officers commissioned Hirst Projects to undertake this pre-feasibility work. The consultancy involved site visits, a review of visitor centre exemplars, consultation with senior Council personnel, workshops with Alderman and discussions with some stakeholders.

2.3. The report provided by the consultant re-affirms the Council’s long held position that The Springs is well located to be the principle visitor node for a kunanyi / Mt Wellington visitor experience.

2.4. The report defines the concept of a visitor centre by describing potential functions and the value it could deliver to the City.

A visitor centre incorporating a variety of functions has the potential to attract a much wider audience to the mountain, improve the quality of their visits and increase the City’s return on investment.

2.5. The report provides a foundation for more detailed investigation, conceptual development and planning.

Should a City-funded visitor centre be further progressed, the next step is to progress a feasibility study which involves market analysis, concept development, infrastructure planning and design and the investigation of business model options for ownership, management and operations.

2.6. Following this work, the proposed visitor centre functions can inform a design brief to enable architectural concept designs and construction cost estimates to be developed.

3. Recommendation

That:

1. The Council commission a feasibility study into a City-funded visitor centre at The Springs, kunanyi / Mount Wellington, at an estimated cost of up to $75,000, with the study to include market analysis, concept development, infrastructure planning and design and the investigation of business model options for ownership, management and operations.

(i) The cost of the study be funded from the Bushland and Reserves Capital Works Program.

2. The Council write to the Wellington Park Management Trust requesting that the Trust schedule the proposed revision of The Springs Master Plan to commence after the Council considers the findings of the feasibility study.

3. A further report be provided upon receipt and review of the feasibility study.

4. Background

4.1. The private sector has had multiple opportunities to deliver public visitor facilities as part of larger commercial developments at The Springs and has been unable to realise these opportunities for a variety of reasons.

4.2. Most recently Council resolved on 19 September 2016 to commence planning and development of a City-funded visitor centre at The Springs on kunanyi / Mt Wellington (and to also consider the potential role of volunteers in relation to the operation of the Centre).

4.3. The Council resolution of 19 September 2016 was actioned by the engagement of a consultancy to better define the concept, issues and value of a publicly funded visitor centre at The Springs.

4.4. Consideration of the role that volunteers can play in the service provision of a visitor centre will be part of the next phase of work which will include investigation of business model options for ownership, management and operations.

4.5. Hirst Projects was commissioned to undertake this pre-feasibility work. The consultancy involved site visits, a review of visitor centre exemplars, consultation with senior Council personnel ( including Manager of the Tasmanian Trave and information Centre), workshops with Alderman and discussions with some stakeholders (i.e. the Manager of the Wellington Park Management Trust )).

4.6. The resultant report is provided in full (refer Attachment A).

springs _ cafe & bikes _ close up (Large)

Key Report Findings

4.7. The City invests substantially in the provision of visitor facilities across the mountain. Visitation (current estimates of 500,000 visitors a year) is projected to grow further. Existing facilities are already strained at peak use times.

4.8. Increased utilisation of tracks and trails and other visitor facilities / experiences of the mountain promoted through a visitor centre would increase the return on the City’s investment.

4.9. A visitor centre can range in functionality from very simple to multifaceted. Almost every major natural attraction researched has a gateway experience / visitor centre of some sort.

4.10. Visitor centre functions recommended for further exploration at The Springs include:

· Entry and Welcome;

· Attraction and Experience;

· Fitness and Wellbeing;

· The Arts;

· Nature;

· Garden and

· Play.

4.11.
The functional relationships diagram below is from page 21 of the consultant’s report.

4.12. A visitor centre incorporating a range of functions has the potential to attract a much wider audience to the mountain and involve them in a much deeper engagement.

5. Proposal and Implementation

5.1. It is proposed:

5.1.1. To continue exploring the potential value of a publicly funded visitor centre at The Springs by undertaking a feasibility study including market analysis, concept development, infrastructure planning and design and the investigation of business model options for ownership, management and operations.

5.1.2. To report back to the Council on the outcomes of the above work.

5.2. The Wellington Park Management Trust plan to prepare a revision to The Springs Master Plan.

It is recommended that the Council write to the Wellington Park Management Trust requesting that the Trust schedule the revision of The Springs Master Plan to commence after the Council considers the findings of the feasibility study recommended above.

6.
Strategic Planning and Policy Considerations

6.1. The Springs Visitor Centre concept has been developed from the ideas and aspirations that are expressed in key City of Hobart planning documents. It will help deliver a number of the goals and strategic objectives stated in the Capital City Strategic Plan 2015-2025 including:

· Enriching the visitor experience

· Building community wellbeing

· Supporting economic viability

6.2. kunanyi / Mt Wellington would appear to be an ideal destination to assist in achieving the State’s desired increases in tourism visitation (growth up to 1.5M visitors annually by 2020). A visitor centre at The Springs could promote the mountain as a place which embodies arts and culture, as well as the more obvious sport and recreation opportunities.

6.3. kunanyi / Mt Wellington is clearly seen as a major asset to be protected and enhanced. Any development needs to create benefits without impacting its natural values.

7. Financial Implications

7.1. Funding Source and Impact on Current Year Operating Result

7.1.1. The recommended investigations are estimated to cost in the order of $50,000 - $75,000.

Funds are available from the Bushland and Reserves Capital Works Budget for The Springs (Budget Function 320) in the current financial year.

Although the feasibility study works can be commissioned this financial year, these funds would need to be carried forward into the 2017/2018 financial year, when the works would be billable.

7.2. Impact on Future Years’ Financial Result

7.2.1. As above.

8.
Legal, Risk and Legislative Considerations

8.1. Current provision of visitor facilities at The Springs is not keeping up with customer demand at the City’s highest profile natural asset. In turn, this presents a reputational risk for the City.

8.2. A potential cable car development with terminal facilities at the summit interplays with any potential development of a visitor centre at The Springs.

8.3. Interim improvements to visitor amenity at The Springs are currently being scoped, planned and delivered.

This program of works which includes improvements to traffic management and parking, visitor information and signage and picnic facilities will continue to be implemented in parallel with the feasibility study.

9. Social and Customer Considerations

9.1. This report’s recommendation to continue to develop and plan for a publicly funded visitor centre at The Springs is not expected to raise public relations issues or concerns at this stage.

9.2. The Council is demonstrating that it is pursuing improved visitor facilities in a manner informed by customer demand, best practice and business feasibility.

9.3. As noted above, interim improvements to visitor amenity are being progressed and the new semi–permanent café (Lost Freight) now trading at The Springs six days per week are delivering improved visitor services.

10. Community and Stakeholder Engagement

10.1. Considering the profile of the mountain in the community and the current status of the cable car proposal it is considered necessary to implement some communications to inform the community of the next phase of work.

11. Delegation

11.1. This is a matter for the Council

.As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.

Greg Milne

Visitor Services Manager

Rob Mather

Robert Mather

Group Manager Open Space

Glenn Doyle

Director Parks and City Amenity

Date: 5 May 2017

File Reference: F17/41598; 5587226

Attachment a: The Springs Visitor Centre Pre-Feasibility Report - Hirst Projects ⇩

Item No. 6.6

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 262

11/5/2017

REPORT TITLE: Proposed Extension of the Intercity Cycleway - Regatta Grounds through Macquarie Point to Evans Street

REPORT PROVIDED BY: Manager Parks and Recreation

Director Parks and City Amenity

1. Report Purpose and Community Benefit

1.1. The purpose of this report is to seek approval for the extension of the Intercity Cycleway, from the Regatta Grounds along Macquarie Point rail corridor to Evans Street.

1.2. The extension is supported and encouraged by the Macquarie Point Development Corporation and will improve connection to the City from the Northern suburbs and help activate the Macquarie Point area.

2. Report Summary

2.1. The Intercity Cycleway runs along the rail corridor from Claremont to McVilly Drive at the Hobart Regatta Grounds.

From McVilly Drive the Cycleway diverts from the rail corridor to run along the Tasman Highway and into Sullivans Cove parallel to Davey Street, via a pathway of a lesser standard.

2.2. The cycleway is very popular with cyclists (both commuters and recreational) as well as joggers, skaters and walkers with an estimate average daily usage of 400-1,000 (a counter is located near the southern end of the cycleway).

2.3. The Macquarie Point Development Corporation is keen to improve community access to its site and wishes to improve overall activation of the area.

The extension (of approximately 1,000m) of the Cycleway through Macquarie Point is seen as a good option to address the goals of Macquarie Point Development Corporation and to improve the quality of the pathway connection into the City.

2.4. A preliminary assessment has been undertaken which has confirmed that the extension of the Cycleway is practical and appropriate.

2.5. The report proposes that the proposed extension of the Cycleway be approved to enable detailed planning and construction of the facility to be progressed.

3. Recommendation

That:

1. The City work in partnership with the Macquarie Point Development Corporation to enable the construction of the extension of the Intercity Cycleway, from McVilly Drive, Hobart Regatta Grounds, through Macquarie Point to Evans Street.

2. The City’s financial contribution of an estimated $400,000 to construct approximately 400m of the cycleway from McVilly Drive to the boundary of the Macquarie Point development site, be approved.

3. Funding for the works be provided in the 2017/2018 Capital Works Program.

4. The approval be provided on the condition that the Macquarie Point Development Corporation fund construction of the cycleway through its site to Evans Street (approximately 600 metres).

5. The General Manager be authorised to lodge Development Applications for the works.

4. Background

4.1. The Intercity Cycleway, established in the mid-1990’s runs along the rail corridor from Claremont to McVilly Drive at the Hobart Regatta Grounds for of distance of approximately 16km.

4.2. The cycleway is very popular with cyclists (both commuters and recreational) as well as joggers, skaters and walkers with an estimate average daily usage of 400-1,000 (a counter is located near the southern end of the cycleway).

4.3. The Macquarie Point Development Corporation is keen to improve community access to its site and wishes to improve overall activation of the area.

The extension (of approximately 1,000m) of the Cycleway through Macquarie Point is seen as a good option to address the goals of Macquarie Point Development Corporation and to improve the quality of the pathway into the City.

4.4. A preliminary assessment has been undertaken which has confirmed that the extension of the Cycleway is practical and appropriate.

4.5. Approval in-principle is sought to enable detailed planning and construction of the facility to be progressed.

4.6. The attached plan (Attachment A) provides an indication of the proposed alignment of the extended Cycleway.

4.7. The total length of the extension is approximately 1,000m.

4.7.1. It is proposed that the City fund 400m of the cycleway (from McVilly Drive to the Macquarie Point development site boundary) at an estimated cost of $400,000.

4.7.2. Advice has been provided that the Board of the Macquarie Point Development Corporation has approved the allocation of funding to enable the proposed extension of the Cycleway to proceed through its site.

4.8. The extension of the Cycleway from McVilly Drive through to its junction with the Macquarie Point development site boundary will be of concrete construction.

4.9. As the alignment through the Macquarie Point development site is likely to change as the site is gradually developed, the surface of the Cycleway through this area will be hotmix/bitumen.

4.10. It is planned that the facility be fenced and have lighting provided for its entire length.

4.11. Planning will also take place to determine how best users of the new facility will cross Evans St and connect with the City Centre.

5. Proposal and Implementation

5.1. A close working relationship will be developed with the Macquarie Point Development Corporation to undertake the following:

5.1.1. Complete the design and pre-tender estimate for the Cycleway extension.

5.1.2. Liaise with all relevant stakeholders, including the Hobart Regatta Association, TasRail, TasPorts and the cycling community.

5.1.3. Procure a contractor to undertake the construction of the new facility.

5.2. It is hoped that construction of the new facility might be completed to coincide with the 2018 Hobart Regatta which will be held February 2018.

6. Strategic Planning and Policy Considerations

6.1. The following Strategic Objectives within the City’s Capital City Strategic Plan 2015-2025 support the proposal:

1.3 Vibrant City Centre and suburban precincts

1.4 An enriched visitor experience

2.1 A fully accessible and connected city environment

2.2 A people-focused city with well-designed and well managed urban and recreation spaces

4.2 City facilities, infrastructure and open spaces support healthy lifestyles

7. Financial Implications

7.1. Funding Source and Impact on Current Year Operating Result

7.1.1. No impact on 2016/2017 budget.

7.2. Impact on Future Years’ Financial Result

7.2.1. Funding of the estimated $400,000 is not currently available in the City’s 2017/2018 Capital Works Program.

However, a review of the projects endorsed by the Council is now underway to determine how funding can be reallocated to enable this project to proceed.

8. Environmental Considerations

8.1. Any environmental considerations in relation to the construction of the extension will be addressed through the statutory approval processes, as may be required.

8.2. The strengthening of non-vehicle traffic corridors by the extension of the cycleway can only assist in mitigating traffic congestion into, out of and through the City.

9. Social and Customer Considerations

9.1. Additional and improved connections through Macquarie Point will provide an opportunity for further activation of what will become a significant city precinct.

10. Community and Stakeholder Engagement

10.1. Engagement with stakeholders will be required as part of the planning for the proposed extension.

11. Delegation

11.1. This is a matter for the Council.

Simon Harrison

Manager Parks and Recreation

Glenn Doyle

Director Parks and City Amenity

Date: 5 May 2017

File Reference: F17/43981; 37-1-3

Attachment a: Intercity Cycleway Extension - Map of Indicative Alignment ⇩

Item No. 7.1

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 269

11/5/2017

7 Motions of which Notice has been Given

7.1 Review of the Council's Significant Tree Register

FILE REF: F17/45230

Alderman Reynolds

Motion

“Council requests that a report be prepared to:

Review the Council's Significant Tree Register and provide advice on:

· whether the current register should be updated via a new nomination process

· whether the assessment criteria for nominations for significant trees should be broadened

· whether the nomination process should be updated to reflect best practise for similar exceptional / significant tree policies nationally.

· The impact of the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme and the Statewide Planning system on the Council's significant tree register and whether trees on the register on private land are protected or not.

· Any actions Council may need to consider to protect Council's significant trees under the new statewide planning system.

· Whether Council should also consider the introduction of a Tree Management Policy, modelled on the policies of many Councils nationally that protect trees over a certain size or of a certain species on private property.

· The report consider options or barriers for Council if it wanted to introduce a broader Tree Management Policy in the context of the Statewide Planning System.”

Rationale:

“There have been a number of recent high profile examples of trees being removed and community concern that the tree should have been listed on and protected by Hobart's Register of Significant Trees. These cases have included trees near the Cenotaph, a large Blue Gum on Defence Land in Davey Street and a historically significant Pine Tree.

Hobart's register of Significant Trees is based on a nomination process that was run in 2010. There may be value in opening the register to nominations again or having a permanent portal for nominations to be received at any time, as many Councils have, such as the City of Melbourne, exceptional tree register - see http://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/community/parks-open-spaces/tree-protection-management/pages/exceptional-tree-register.aspx

It is also important to review how effective the current significant tree register and provisions will be in the context of the new planning scheme and statewide planning system, as well as consider options available to Council to ensure adequate protection for significant trees. It may be timely to review whether the assessment criteria we use for assessing our significant trees matches similar exceptional tree policies nationally.

Recent correspondence from the Lord Mayor to Mount Nelson residents concerned about the recent removal of significant trees in that area, suggested that the register and current system does not provide protection for listed trees in private gardens.

Many Councils around Australia have a suite of tree policies that includes - street tree strategies, significant tree registers and tree protection and management laws.

A large number of Councils have local laws to protect trees on private land over a certain size, with large canopies or trunk diameter. These policies are designed to promote the good management of vegetation and the protection of biodiversity in cities. Some examples of these policies include:

- Hills Shire

http://www.thehills.nsw.gov.au/Services/Environmental-Management/Trees/Trees-on-Private-Land

- Boroondara Shire - Tree Protection local law

https://www.boroondara.vic.gov.au/our-city/trees/tree-works-permits

- Frankston Shire - Local Law

http://www.frankston.vic.gov.au/Environment_and_Waste/Environment/Trees/Local_Laws_for_Trees

- Gosford

http://www.gosford.nsw.gov.au/building-and-development/general-information/trees-on-private-property

- Ballarat

http://www.ballarat.vic.gov.au/sh/trees-and-native-vegetation.aspx

- Penrith

https://www.penrithcity.nsw.gov.au/Documents/Waste.../Tree-Preservation-Factsheet/

- City of Sydney Tree Management Policy

http://www.cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/132248/Tree-Management-Policy.pdf.”

The General Manager reports:

“In line with the Council’s policy in relation to Notices of Motion, I advise that the matter is considered to be within the jurisdiction of the Hobart City Council as it relates to a document which is administered by the Council.”

about people	We value people – our community, our customers and colleagues.
professional	We take pride in our work.
enterprising	We look for ways to create value.
responsive	We’re accessible and focused on service.
inclusive	We respect diversity in people and ideas.
making a difference	We recognise that everything we do shapes Hobart’s future.