City
of hobart
AGENDA
City Planning Committee Meeting
Open Portion
Monday, 15 May 2017
at 5.00 pm
Lady Osborne Room, Town Hall
THE MISSION
Our mission is to ensure good governance of our capital City.
THE VALUES
The Council is:
about people |
We value people – our community, our customers and colleagues. |
professional |
We take pride in our work. |
enterprising |
We look for ways to create value. |
responsive |
We’re accessible and focused on service. |
inclusive |
We respect diversity in people and ideas. |
making a difference |
We recognise that everything we do shapes Hobart’s future. |
|
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 3 |
|
15/5/2017 |
|
Business listed on the agenda is to be conducted in the order in which it is set out, unless the committee by simple majority determines otherwise.
APOLOGIES AND LEAVE OF ABSENCE
1. Co-Option of a Committee Member in the event of a vacancy
3. Consideration of Supplementary Items
4. Indications of Pecuniary and Conflicts of Interest
6. Planning Authority Items - Consideration of Items With Deputations
7. Committee Acting as Planning Authority
7.1 Applications under the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015
7.1.1 4 Garth Avenue, Sandy Bay - Partial Demolition, Alterations and Extensions
7.1.2 11 Waterworks Road, Dynnyrne - Fencing
7.1.3 24 Quayle Street, Sandy Bay - Alterations and Extension
7.1.4 3-4 Montgomery Court, Sandy Bay - Multiple Dwellings
8.1 Glenorchy to Hobart Public Transit Corridor Project - Implementation
8.2 Heritage Precincts Review - Progress Report
8.3 Delegated Decisions Report (Planning)
8.4 City Planning - Advertising List
9 Committee Action Status Report
|
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 5 |
|
15/5/2017 |
|
City Planning Committee Meeting (Open Portion) held Monday, 15 May 2017 at 5.00 pm in the Lady Osborne Room, Town Hall.
COMMITTEE MEMBERS Briscoe (Chairman) Ruzicka Burnet Denison
ALDERMEN Lord Mayor Hickey Deputy Lord Mayor Christie Zucco Sexton Cocker Thomas Reynolds Harvey |
Apologies: Nil.
Leave of Absence: Alderman Burnet. Alderman Denison.
|
The minutes of the Open Portion of the City Planning Committee meeting held on Monday, 1 May 2017, are submitted for confirming as an accurate record.
|
Ref: Part 2, Regulation 8(6) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015.
That the Committee resolve to deal with any supplementary items not appearing on the agenda, as reported by the General Manager.
|
Ref: Part 2, Regulation 8(7) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015.
Aldermen are requested to indicate where they may have any pecuniary or conflict of interest in respect to any matter appearing on the agenda, or any supplementary item to the agenda, which the committee has resolved to deal with.
Regulation 15 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015.
A committee may close a part of a meeting to the public where a matter to be discussed falls within 15(2) of the above regulations.
In the event that the committee transfer an item to the closed portion, the reasons for doing so should be stated.
Are there any items which should be transferred from this agenda to the closed portion of the agenda, or from the closed to the open portion of the agenda?
In accordance with the requirements of Part 2 Regulation 8(3) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015, the General Manager is to arrange the agenda so that the planning authority items are sequential.
In accordance with Part 2 Regulation 8(4) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015, the Committee by simple majority may change the order of any of the items listed on the agenda, but in the case of planning items they must still be considered sequentially – in other words they still have to be dealt with as a single group on the agenda.
Where deputations are to be received in respect to planning items, past practice has been to move consideration of these items to the beginning of the meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
That in accordance with Regulation 8(4) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015, the Committee resolve to deal with any items which have deputations by members of the public regarding any planning matter listed on the agenda, to be taken out of sequence in order to deal with deputations at the beginning of the meeting.
|
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 6 |
|
15/5/2017 |
|
In accordance with the provisions of Part 2 Regulation 25 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015, the intention of the Committee to act as a planning authority pursuant to the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993 is to be noted.
In accordance with Regulation 25, the Committee will act as a planning authority in respect to those matters appearing under this heading on the agenda, inclusive of any supplementary items.
The Committee is reminded that in order to comply with Regulation 25(2), the General Manager is to ensure that the reasons for a decision by a Council or Council Committee acting as a planning authority are recorded in the minutes.
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 8 |
|
|
15/5/2017 |
|
7.1 Applications under the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015
7.1.1 4 Garth Avenue, Sandy Bay - Partial Demolition, Alterations and Extensions
pln-17-212 - FILE REF: F17/45150
Address: 4 Garth Avenue, Sandy Bay
Proposal: Partial Demolition, Alterations and Extensions
Expiry Date: 16 June 2017
Extension of Time: Not applicable
Author: Michelle Foale
REcommendation Pursuant to the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015, the Council refuse the application for partial demolition, alterations and extensions at 4 Garth Avenue, Sandy Bay for the following reasons:
1 The proposal does not meet the acceptable solution or the performance criterion with respect to clause D10.4.2 Setbacks and building envelope for all dwellings P3 of the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015 because it would cause unreasonable loss of amenity by visual impacts caused by the apparent scale, bulk and proportions of the additions to the dwelling when viewed from adjoining lots.
2 The proposal does not meet the acceptable solution or the performance criterion with respect to clause D10.4.6 Privacy for all dwellings P1 of the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015 because the proposed deck would unacceptably impact on the residential amenity of the private open space of the adjacent lot.
|
Attachment a: PLN-17-212 - 4 GARTH AVENUE SANDY BAY TAS 7005 - Planning Committee or Delegated Report ⇩
Attachment b: DA-17-18731 PLN-17-212 - 4 GARTH AVENUE SANDY BAY TAS 7005 - CPC Agenda Documents ⇩
Item No. 7.1.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 10 ATTACHMENT a |
Item No. 7.1.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 31 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 33 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 35 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 37 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 39 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 41 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 43 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 45 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 47 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 49 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 51 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.2 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 53 |
|
15/5/2017 |
|
7.1.2 11 Waterworks Road, Dynnyrne - Fencing
pln-17-166 - FILE REF: F17/45203
Address: 11 Waterworks Road, Dynnyrne
Proposal: Fencing
Expiry Date: 6 June 2017
Extension of Time: Not applicable
Author: Michelle Foale
REcommendation Pursuant to the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015, the Council refuse the application for fencing at 11 Waterworks Road, Dynnyrne for the following reasons:
1 The proposal does not meet the acceptable solution or the performance criterion with respect to clause D10.4.7 Frontage fences for all dwellings P1 of the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015 because the proposed fencing is incompatible with other fences in the street due to being too high and too solid.
|
Attachment a: PLN-17-166 - 11 WATERWORKS ROAD DYNNYRNE TAS 7005 - Planning Committee or Delegated Report ⇩
Attachment b: PLN-17-166 - 11 WATERWORKS ROAD DYNNYRNE TAS 7005 - CPC Agenda Documents ⇩
Item No. 7.1.2 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 55 ATTACHMENT a |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 69 ATTACHMENT b |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 75 |
|
|
15/5/2017 |
|
7.1.3 24 Quayle Street, Sandy Bay - Alterations and Extension
pln-17-229 - FILE REF: F17/45660
Address: 24 Quayle Street, Sandy Bay
Proposal: Alterations and Extension
Expiry Date: 21 June 2017
Extension of Time: Not applicable
Author: Michelle Foale
REcommendation Pursuant to the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015, the Council refuse the application for alterations and extension (garage) at 24 Quayle Street, Battery Point for the following reasons:
1 The proposal does not meet the acceptable solutions or the performance criteria with respect to clauses D11.4.2 P1, P2 and P3 of the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015 because the proposed wall would be a departure from the existing relationship of existing buildings to the road in terms of setback and height; the location of the garage would not complement or enhance the existing streetscape; and the proposed wall and garage would have unacceptable visual impacts caused by the apparent scale, bulk and proportions of the wall and garage when viewed from the adjoining lot 2 Princes Street.
2 The proposal does not meet the acceptable solutions or the performance criteria with respect to clauses E13.8.2 P1, P2 and P3 of the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015 because the location of the proposed garage, by virtue of its proposed location forward of the road facing elevation, would have an unacceptable impact on the significant visual characteristics of the Quayle/King Street Heritage Precinct.
|
Attachment a: PLN-17-229 - 24 QUAYLE STREET SANDY BAY TAS 7005 - Planning Committee or Delegated Report ⇩
Attachment b: PLN-17-229 - 24 QUAYLE STREET SANDY BAY TAS 7005 - CPC Agenda Documents ⇩
Item No. 7.1.3 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 77 ATTACHMENT a |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 95 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.3 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 96 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.3 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 97 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.3 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 99 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.3 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 101 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.3 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 103 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.3 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 105 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.3 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 107 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.3 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 109 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.3 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 111 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 113 |
|
15/5/2017 |
|
7.1.4 3-4 Montgomery Court, Sandy Bay - Multiple Dwellings
PLN-16-1243 - FILE REF: F17/46783
Address: 3-4 Montgomery Court, Sandy Bay
Proposal: Multiple Dwellings
Expiry Date: 24 May 2017
Extension of Time: Not applicable
Author: Michaela Nolan
REcommendation Pursuant to the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015, the Council approve the application for multiple dwellings at 34 Montgomery Court, Sandy Bay for the reasons outlined in the officer’s report and a permit containing the following conditions be issued:
GEN
The use and/or development must be substantially in accordance with the documents and drawings that comprise PLN161243 34 MONTGOMERY COURT SANDY BAY TAS 7005 Final Planning Documents except where modified below.
Reason for condition
To clarify the scope of the permit.
TW
The use and/or development must comply with the requirements of TasWater as detailed in the form Submission to Planning Authority Notice, Reference No. TWDA 2016/01861HCC dated 08 December 2016 as attached to the permit.
Reason for condition
To clarify the scope of the permit.
ENG sw4
The new storm water connection must be constructed, and any existing connections be abandoned and sealed, by Council at the owner’s expense, prior to the first occupation. The new connection must maximise the area of the Lot which can drain via gravity and be directed down slope. The new connection must discharge stormwater by gravity and be freeflowing.
Detailed engineering drawings must be submitted and approved, prior to commencement of work. The detailed engineering drawings must:
1. be prepared by a suitably qualified person; 2. include the location of the proposed connection clear from any potential clashes (such as the crossover wing); 3. include the size and design of the connection such that it is appropriate to satisfy the needs of the development. 4. include longitudinal sections of the proposed connection that clearly shows clearance from any nearby services, depth of cover, size, material and delineation of public and private infrastructure.
All work required by this condition must be undertaken in accordance with the approved detailed engineering drawings.
Advice: Once the detailed engineered drawings have been approved the Council will issue a condition endorsement (see general advice on how to obtain condition endorsement).
Please note that once the condition endorsement has been issued you will need to contact Council’s City Infrastructure Division to initiate an application for service connection.
Reason for condition
To ensure the site is drained adequately.
ENG sw6
All stormwater from the proposed development (including hardstand runoff) must be discharged to the Council infrastructure with sufficient receiving capacity prior to first occupation. All stormwater which is practicable to drain to Council infrastructure via gravity (including suspended or charged systems) must do so. Any pumped or charged flows must be converted to freeflowing gravity within a private transition pit inside the property prior to discharging to the freeflowing gravity connection to Council infrastructure. All costs associated with works required by this condition are to be met by the owner.
Design drawings and calculations of the proposed stormwater drainage must be submitted and approved prior to the commencement of work. The design drawings and calculations must:
1. be prepared by a suitably qualified person; and 2. include longitudinal sections showing levels and grades to the point of discharge; 3. include detail design of any proposed pump system which is to be in accordance with Australian Standard AS/NZS 3500.3:2015 Part 3: Stormwater Drainage Systems.
All work required by this condition must be undertaken and maintained in accordance with the approved design drawings and calculations.
Advice: Once the design drawings and calculations have been approved Council will issue a condition endorsement (see general advice on how to obtain condition endorsement).
Reason for condition
To ensure that stormwater from the site will be discharged to a suitable Council approved outlet.
ENG sw7
Stormwater pretreatment and detention for stormwater discharges from the development must be installed prior to commencement of use.
Design drawings, and associated calculations, of the proposed stormwater quantity and quality control systems must be submitted and approved, prior to commencement of work on the site. The design drawings and calculations must:
1. be prepared by a suitably qualified person; 2. demonstrate that the final detention design achieves the design targets contained in the submitted Aldanmark report dated 10/2/2017. 3. detailed design drawings of the detention tank must show the layout, the inlet and outlet (including in longsection) and the overflow mechanism. 4. include Water Sensitive Urban Design and stormwater treatment that achieves the stormwater quality targets in accordance with the State Stormwater Strategy 2010; and 5. Include a supporting stormwater management plan that outlines the obligations for future property owners to stormwater management, including a maintenance plan which outlines the operational and maintenance measures to check and ensure the ongoing effective operation of all systems, such as: inspection frequency; cleanout procedures; descriptions and diagrams of how the installed systems operate; details of the life of assets and replacement requirements;
All work required by this condition must be undertaken and maintained in accordance with the approved design drawings and reports.
Advice: Once the design drawings have been approved Council will issue a condition endorsement (see general advice on how to obtain condition endorsement).
Reason for condition
To avoid the possible pollution and capacity issues of drainage systems and natural watercourses, and to comply with relevant State legislation.
ENG 4
The driveway and car parking area approved by this permit must be constructed to a sealed standard and surface drained prior to the first occupation.
Reason for condition
To ensure safe access is provided for the use.
ENG 8
All parking spaces must be delineated by means of white or yellow lines 80mm to 100mm wide, or white or yellow pavements markers in accordance to Australian/NZS Standard, Parking facilities Part 1: Offstreet car parking AS/NZS 2890.1, prior to the commencement of the use.
Reason for condition
In the interests of vehicle user safety and the amenity of the development.
ENG 1
The cost of repair of any damage to the Council infrastructure resulting from the implementation of this permit, must be met by the owners within 30 days of the completion of the development or as otherwise determined by the Council. Any damage must be immediately reported to Council.
A photographic record of the Council infrastructure adjacent to the subject site must be provided to the Council prior to any commencement of works.
A photographic record of the Council’s infrastructure (e.g. existing property service connection points, roads, buildings, stormwater, footpaths, driveway crossovers and nature strips, including if any, pre existing damage) will be relied upon to establish the extent of damage caused to the Council’s infrastructure during construction. In the event that the owner/developer fails to provide to the Council a photographic record of the Council’s infrastructure, then any damage to the Council infrastructure found on completion of works will be deemed to be the responsibility of the owner.
Reason for condition
To ensure that any of the Council infrastructure and/or siterelated service connections affected by the proposal will be altered and/or reinstated at the owner’s full cost.
ENGR 3
Prior to the commencement of use, the proposed driveway crossover, replacement of footpath and kerb and channel in Montgomery Court highway reservation must be designed and constructed in accordance with:
· Urban TSDR09v1 – Urban Roads Driveways and TSD R14v1 Vee Channel vehicular crossing · Footpath Urban Roads Footpaths TSDR11v1
· Kerb and Channel TSD R14v1 Type KC (Kerb and Channel)
Design drawings must be submitted and approved prior to the commencement of work. The design drawing must:
1. Show the cross and long section of the driveway crossover within the highway reservation and onto the property. 2. Show the extent of the footpath and kerb and channel to be replaced. 3. Show the end of the new footpath and kerb and channel matching neatly to the existing footpath and kerb and channel. 4. Detail any services or infrastructure (ie light poles, pits, awnings) at or near the proposed driveway crossover 5. Be prepared and certified by a suitable qualified person, to satisfy the above requirement.
All work required by this condition must be undertaken in accordance with the approved drawings.
Advice: Once the approved drawings has been approved Council will issue a condition endorsement (see general advice on how to obtain condition endorsement).
Reason for condition
To ensure that works will comply with the Council’s standard requirements.
ENV 2
Sediment and erosion control measures sufficient to prevent sediment from leaving the site must be installed prior to the commencement of work and maintained until such time as all disturbed areas have been stabilised and/or restored or sealed to the Council’s satisfaction.
A soil and water management plan (SWMP) must be submitted and approved, prior to the commencement of work. The SWMP must be prepared in accordance with the Soil and Water Management on Building and Construction Sites fact sheets (Derwent Estuary Program, 2008), available here.
All work must be undertaken in accordance with this condition and the approved SWMP.
Advice: Once the SWMP has been approved, the Council will issue a condition endorsement (see general advice on how to obtain condition endorsement).
Reason for condition
To avoid the pollution and sedimentation of roads, drains and natural watercourses that could be caused by erosion and runoff from the development.
SUB sp1
The titles comprising the development site (CT 61047/3 and CT 61047/4) are to be adhered in accordance with the provisions of Section 110 of the Local Government Building & Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1993, to the satisfaction of Council prior to the issue of any building consent (including demolition) pursuant to the Building Act 2016, or the commencement of works on site (whichever occurs first).
Advice: Once the titles have been adhered, the Council will issue a condition endorsement (see general advice on how to obtain condition endorsement). The condition endorsement is to be obtained prior to submitting any building or plumbing application.
Reason for condition
So that the titles are adhered and to ensure compliance with statutory provisions
ADVICE
The following advice is provided to you to assist in the implementation of the planning permit that has been issued subject to the conditions above. The advice is not exhaustive and you must inform yourself of any other legislation, bylaws, regulations, codes or standards that will apply to your development under which you may need to obtain an approval. Visit the Council's website for further information.
Prior to any commencement of work on the site or commencement of use the following additional permits/approval may be required from the Hobart City Council.
CONDITION ENDORSEMENT
If a condition endorsement is required by a planning condition above, you will need to submit the relevant documentation to satisfy the condition, via the Condition Endorsement Submission on Council's online eservice portal.
Once approved, the Council will respond to you via email that the condition(s) has been endorsed (satisfied). Detailed instructions can be found here.
BUILDING PERMIT
Building permit in accordance with the Building Act 2016. Click here for more information.
PLUMBING PERMIT
Plumbing permit in accordance with the Tasmanian Plumbing Regulations 2014. Click here for more information.
OCCUPATION OF THE PUBLIC HIGHWAY
Permit for the occupation of the public highway for construction or special event (e.g. placement of skip bin, crane, scissor lift etc). Click here for more information.
Occupational licence for use of Hobart City Council highway reservation (outdoor seating, etc). Click here for more information.
Occupational license for structures in the Hobart City Council highway reservation, in accordance with conditions to be established by the Council. Click here for more information.
Road closure permits for construction or special event. Click here for more information.
Permit to Open Up and Temporarily Occupy a Highway (for work in the road reserve). Click here for more information.
TEMPORARY PARKING PERMITS
Temporary parking permits for construction vehicles i.e. residential or meter parking/loading zones. Click here for more information.
BUILDING OVER AN EASEMENT
In order to build over the service easement, you will require the consent of the Hobart City Council in accordance with section 161 of the Building Act 2000 and Regulation 34 Plumbing Regulations 2004.
PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE
Permit to construct public infrastructure with a 12 month maintenance period and bond (please contact the Hobart City Council's City Infrastructure Division to initiate the permit process).
NEW SERVICE CONNECTION
New service connection (please contact the Hobart City Council's City Infrastructure Division to initiate the application process).
STORM WATER
Please note that in addition to a building and/or plumbing permit, development must be in accordance with the Hobart City Council’s Hydraulic Services By law. Click here for more information.
WORK WITHIN THE HIGHWAY RESERVATION
Please note development must be in accordance with the Hobart City Council’s Highways By law. Click here for more information.
DRIVEWAY SURFACING OVER HIGHWAY RESERVATION
If a coloured or textured surface is used for the driveway access within the Highway Reservation, the Council or other service provider will not match this on any reinstatement of the driveway access within the Highway Reservation required in the future.
ACCESS
Designed in accordance with LGAT IPWEA – Tasmanian standard drawings. Click here for more information.
CROSS OVER CONSTRUCTION
The construction of the crossover can be undertaken by the Council or by a private contractor, subject to Council approval of the design. Click here for more information.
STORM WATER / ROADS / ACCESS
Services to be designed and constructed in accordance with the (IPWEA) LGAT – standard drawings. Click here for more information.
RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMITS ELIGIBILITY
It is advised that this development will not be eligible for residential parking permits for onstreet parking.
TITLE ADHESION
An adhesion of your titles is required because a portion of your development is across one or more title boundaries. Contact your solicitor or a registered land surveyor to initiate the process.
WORK PLACE HEALTH AND SAFETY
Appropriate occupational health and safety measures must be employed during the works to minimise direct human exposure to potentiallycontaminated soil, water, dust and vapours. Click here for more information.
NOISE REGULATIONS
Click here for information with respect to noise nuisances in residential areas.
WASTE DISPOSAL
Click here for information regarding waste disposal.
DIAL BEFORE YOU DIG
Click here for dial before you dig information.
|
Attachment a: PLN-16-1243 - 3-4 MONTGOMERY COURT SANDY BAY TAS 7005 - Planning Committee or Delegated Report ⇩
Attachment b: PLN-16-1243 - 3-4 MONTGOMERY COURT SANDY BAY TAS 7005 - CPC Agenda Documents ⇩
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 124 ATTACHMENT a |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 173 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 175 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 177 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 179 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 181 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 183 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 185 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 187 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 189 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 191 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 193 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 195 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 197 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 199 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 201 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 203 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 205 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 207 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 209 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 211 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 213 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 215 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 217 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 219 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 221 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 223 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 225 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 227 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 229 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 231 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 233 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 235 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 237 ATTACHMENT b |
Item No. 7.1.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 240 ATTACHMENT b |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 280 |
|
|
15/5/2017 |
|
8 Reports
8.1 Glenorchy to Hobart Public Transit Corridor Project - Implementation
File Ref: F17/44276; 36-20-1
Report of the Manager Planning Policy and Heritage of 10 May 2017.
Delegation: Council
Item No. 8.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 282 |
|
15/5/2017 |
|
REPORT TITLE: Glenorchy to Hobart Public Transit Corridor Project - Implementation
REPORT PROVIDED BY: Manager Planning Policy and Heritage
1. Report Purpose and Community Benefit
1.1. The purpose of this report is to provide Council with an update on the actions endorsed by Council when it considered the outcomes of the Glenorchy to Hobart Public Transit Corridor Study (GHD 2016) on 20 February 2017.
1.2. The project has the potential to act as a catalyst to support urban renewal and generate significant economic and social benefits for the community.
2. Report Summary
2.1. Council considered the Glenorchy to Hobart Public Transit Corridor Study Reports (GHD Oct 2016) at its meeting on 20 February 2017 and resolved that a number of actions be undertaken including the provision of the reports to the State Government, formation of a steering committee and preparation of a communications strategy.
2.2. The Transit Corridor Steering Committee met on 16 March 2017 and discussed the formation of a steering committee, which is to be chaired by the Lord Mayor, to undertake the work required. The Steering Committee recommends that the steering committee be a continuation of the current committee comprised of the following members with the addition of the Lord Mayor as Chair:
2.2.1. HCC Alderman Thomas, and Reynolds;
2.2.2. HCC General Manager (N.D. Heath);
2.2.3. GCC Acting General Manager, (T. McMullen);
2.2.4. Allan Garcia (Infrastructure Tasmania).
2.3. The Steering Committee also recommends that both Hobart and Glenorchy Councils commission a suitably qualified consultant with specialist expertise in projects of this nature to assist in and provide advice in relation to project implementation. This would include advice and assistance in relation to:
2.3.1. Engagement with State and Federal Government in relation to process and opportunities for governance change to help drive urban renewal projects such as that proposed with the Glenorchy to Hobart Public Transit Corridor Project;
2.3.2. Identification of and discussions with key players in the field of urban renewal and transit oriented development;
2.3.3. Identification of private equity interest in urban renewal and transit oriented development; and
2.3.4. Advice in relation to development of Council owned land along the corridor.
2.4. It is estimated that the cost of such a consultant would be in the order of $40,000 and it is proposed that each Council would contribute $20,000. The role would initially be for a six to nine month period and if progress was being achieved then a further extension and or funding from other sources would be sought to progress the project. Subject to Council support of this proposal and Glenorchy Council agreeing to contribute $20,000 a brief will be prepared for endorsement of the Steering Committee and expressions of interest called.
2.5. Implementation of the communication strategy prepared by Council’s City Marketing Unit will continue as the project progresses.
That: 1. The Glenorchy to Hobart Transit Corridor Steering Committee be comprised of the following members: (a) Lord Mayor (Chair); (b) HCC Alderman Thomas and Reynolds; (c) HCC General Manager (N.D. Heath); (d) GCC Acting General Manager, (T. McMullen); (e) Allan Garcia (Infrastructure Tasmania). 2. Subject to Glenorchy City Council agreeing to contribute $20,000, a suitably qualified consultant with specialist expertise in implementation of urban renewal and transit oriented development projects be commissioned to assist in and provide advice in relation to project implementation with a brief being prepared for endorsement by the Steering Committee and expressions of interest called.
|
4. Background
4.1. Council considered the Glenorchy to Hobart Public Transit Corridor Study Reports (GHD Oct 2016) at its meeting on 20 February 2017 and resolved as follows:
4.1.1. The Glenorchy to Hobart Public Transit Corridor Study Reports (GHD Oct 2016) be provided to the State Government.
4.1.2. The Council engage with State and Federal Government in relation to process and opportunities for governance change to help drive urban renewal projects such as proposed with the Glenorchy to Hobart Public Transit Corridor Project.
4.1.3. A report be prepared on the formation of a steering committee, which is to be chaired by the Lord Mayor, to undertake the work required.
4.1.4. The Glenorchy to Hobart Public Transit Corridor Study outcomes (GHD Oct 2016) be considered as part of a future City Deal proposal.
4.1.5. A communications strategy be developed in relation to the Glenorchy to Hobart Public Transit Corridor Study Reports (GHD Oct 2016).
4.1.6. A further report be prepared regarding the potential for a medium density mixed use development project on the Hobart owned land forming part of the corridor
4.2. The Glenorchy to Hobart Public Transit Corridor Study Reports (GHD Oct 2016) have been provided to the State Government.
4.3. The Transit Corridor Steering Committee met on 16 March 2017 and discussed the formation of a steering committee, which is to be chaired by the Lord Mayor, to undertake the work required. The Steering Committee recommends that the steering committee be a continuation of the current committee comprised of the following members with the addition of the Lord Mayor as chair:
4.3.1. HCC Alderman Thomas and Reynolds;
4.3.2. HCC General Manager (N.D. Heath);
4.3.3. GCC Acting General Manager, (T. McMullen);
4.3.4. Allan Garcia (Infrastructure Tasmania).
4.4. The Steering Committee also recommends that both Hobart and Glenorchy Councils commission a suitably qualified consultant with specialist expertise in projects of this nature to assist in and provide advice in relation to project implementation. This would include advice and assistance in relation to:
4.4.1. Engagement with State and Federal Government in relation to process and opportunities for governance change to help drive urban renewal projects such as that proposed with the Glenorchy to Hobart Public Transit Corridor Project;
4.4.2. Identification of and discussions with key players in the field of urban renewal and transit oriented development;
4.4.3. Identification of private equity interest in urban renewal and transit oriented development; and
4.4.4. Advice in relation to development of Council owned land along the corridor.
4.5. It is estimated that the cost of such a consultant would be in the order of $40,000 and it is proposed that each Council would contribute $20,000. The role would initially be for a six to nine month period and if progress was being achieved then a further extension and or funding from other sources would be sought to progress the project. Subject to Council support of this proposal and Glenorchy Council agreeing to contribute $20,000 a brief will be prepared for endorsement of the Steering Committee and expressions of interest called.
4.6. A communications strategy has been developed in relation to the Glenorchy to Hobart Public Transit Corridor Study Reports by Council’s City Marketing Unit. Key elements of the strategy include creation of a specific web page at: http://www.hobartcity.com.au/Transport/Transport_Corridor , news item published on the HCC Facebook page, item published in the Hobart Observer and an upcoming front page item in Capital City News. Further media releases, Facebook posts, web page updates and fact sheets will be used at key stages as the project progresses.
5. Proposal and Implementation
5.1.1. It is proposed that Council endorse the continuation of the Transit Corridor Steering Committee and the recommendation from the Steering Committee that that both Hobart and Glenorchy Councils commission a suitably qualified consultant with specialist expertise in projects of this nature to assist in and provide advice in relation to project implementation.
6. Strategic Planning and Policy Considerations
6.1. This project would further Strategic Objective: 1.1 of the City of Hobart’s Capital City Strategic Plan 2015-2025 which provides for partnerships to create city growth and Strategic Objective: 2.1 which provides for a fully accessible and connected city environment.
7. Financial Implications
7.1. Funding Source and Impact on Current Year Operating Result
7.1.1. $20,000 would need to be allocated in the 2017/2018 Budget if a suitably qualified consultant is to be appointed.
7.2. Impact on Future Years’ Financial Result
7.2.1. This would be a matter for more detailed consideration at a later date, depending upon how the overall project might be implemented.
7.3. Asset Related Implications
7.3.1. None at this stage.
8. Legal, Risk and Legislative Considerations
8.1. As previously advised elements of the overall implementation plan could require legislative change.
9. Delegation
9.1. This matter is delegated to the Council.
As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.
James McIlhenny Manager Planning Policy and Heritage |
|
Date: 10 May 2017
File Reference: F17/44276; 36-20-1
Item No. 8.2 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 286 |
|
15/5/2017 |
|
8.2 Heritage Precincts Review - Progress Report
File Ref: F17/46062; 32-13-4
Memorandum of the Senior Cultural Heritage Officer of 10 May 2017 and attachments.
Delegation: Committee
Item No. 8.2 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 288 |
|
15/5/2017 |
|
Memorandum: City Planning Committee
Heritage Precincts Review - Progress Report
This memorandum provides Council with an update of the work currently being undertaken in relation to the review of heritage precincts in the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015.
Completed Work:
33 Precincts have been visited, photographed, and analysed. 29 of these precincts have been completed to a final draft stage in the form of 8 page booklets. Examples provided in Attachments A to D.
List of Completed Precincts |
|
West Hobart 1 West Hobart 2 West Hobart 5 West Hobart 6 North Hobart 3 North Hobart 12 North Hobart 4 North Hobart 8 Mount Stuart 3 Mount Stuart 4 Lenah Valley 8 Hobart 2 New Town 3 New Town 4 New Town 8
|
South Hobart 4 South Hobart 5 South Hobart 6 South Hobart 7 Sandy Bay 1 Sandy Bay 2 Sandy Bay 3 Sandy Bay 4 Sandy Bay 6 Sandy Bay 7 Sandy Bay 9 Sandy Bay 10 Sandy Bay 12 Sandy Bay 14
|
The GIS Collector App continues to be a fundamental tool for the project. As precincts are completed an analysis of contributory, neutral, and non-contributory elements are mapped. GIS are then notified and able to regenerate maps with scale bar, north point, and clear street names. These final maps can then be inserted into the precinct booklets.
Many of the larger precincts within West Hobart, South Hobart, and North Hobart have now been completed. Multiple smaller precincts located in close proximity to each other, have been able to be analysed within a single visit.
The focus of the Precinct inspection timetable is currently turning to the outer HCC areas of Lenah Valley and New Town.
Tasks to do:
The statements of significance drafted for booklets completed earlier in the project are currently being revised to reflect the new State Planning Provisions under C6.0 Local Historic Heritage Code.
2-3 Precinct visits continue to take place weekly with on average 1.5 booklets completed each week.
Additional Notes:
Statements of are now structured to reflect the new State Planning Provisions under the following headings:
- For contributing to the understanding of local history;
- For the representation of aesthetic characteristics;
- For the representation of a class of buildings or place;
- For the association with a particular community or cultural group for social or spiritual reasons.
A running list of findings and observations within precincts continues to be added to. This includes; possible precinct boundary reviews, listed buildings not marked as such and other small GIS mapping errors, buildings within precincts that have potential for heritage listing, and heritage precincts that may need an overall review in regards to the quality of housing and streetscapes.
That the information be received and noted.
|
As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.
Brendan Lennard Senior Cultural Heritage Officer |
|
Date: 10 May 2017
File Reference: F17/46062; 32-13-4
Attachment a: Newlands Avenue Heritage Precinct Statement - (Draft) ⇩
Attachment b: New Town 8 Heritage Precinct - (Draft) ⇩
Attachment c: North Hobart 12 Heritage Precinct - (Draft) ⇩
Attachment d: Sandy Bay Heritage Precinct 2 ⇩
Item No. 8.2 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 291 ATTACHMENT a |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 299 ATTACHMENT b |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 307 ATTACHMENT c |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 315 ATTACHMENT d |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 322 |
|
|
15/5/2017 |
|
8.3 Delegated Decisions Report (Planning)
File Ref: F17/45708; 16/117
Memorandum of the Director City Planning of 10 May 2017 and attachment.
Delegation: Committee
Item No. 8.3 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 323 |
|
15/5/2017 |
|
Memorandum: City Planning Committee
Delegated Decisions Report (Planning)
Attached is the delegated planning decisions report for the period 24 April 2017 until 7 May 2017.
That the information be received and noted.
|
As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.
Neil Noye Director City Planning |
|
Date: 10 May 2017
File Reference: F17/45708; 16/117
Attachment a: Delegated Decisions Report (Planning) ⇩
Item No. 8.3 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 324 ATTACHMENT a |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 325 |
|
|
15/5/2017 |
|
8.4 City Planning - Advertising List
File Ref: F17/46328; 16/117
Memorandum of the Director City Planning of 10 May 2017 and attachment.
Delegation: Committee
Item No. 8.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 326 |
|
15/5/2017 |
|
Memorandum: City Planning Committee
City Planning - Advertising List
Attached is the advertising list for the period 24 April 2017 until 7 May 2017.
That the information be received and noted.
|
As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.
Neil Noye Director City Planning |
|
Date: 10 May 2017
File Reference: F17/46328; 16/117
Attachment a: City Planning - Advertising List ⇩
Item No. 8.4 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 328 ATTACHMENT a |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 330 |
|
|
15/5/2017 |
|
9 Committee Action Status Report
A report indicating the status of current decisions is attached for the information of Aldermen.
REcommendation
That the information be received and noted.
Delegation: Committee
Item No. 9.1 |
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting - 15/5/2017 |
Page 332 ATTACHMENT a |
|
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 344 |
|
15/5/2017 |
|
Section 29 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015.
File Ref: 13-1-10
An Alderman may ask a question without notice of the Chairman, another Alderman, the General Manager or the General Manager’s representative, in line with the following procedures:
1. The Chairman will refuse to accept a question without notice if it does not relate to the Terms of Reference of the Council committee at which it is asked.
2. In putting a question without notice, an Alderman must not:
(i) offer an argument or opinion; or
(ii) draw any inferences or make any imputations – except so far as may be necessary to explain the question.
3. The Chairman must not permit any debate of a question without notice or its answer.
4. The Chairman, Aldermen, General Manager or General Manager’s representative who is asked a question may decline to answer the question, if in the opinion of the respondent it is considered inappropriate due to its being unclear, insulting or improper.
5. The Chairman may require a question to be put in writing.
6. Where a question without notice is asked and answered at a meeting, both the question and the response will be recorded in the minutes of that meeting.
7. Where a response is not able to be provided at the meeting, the question will be taken on notice and
(i) the minutes of the meeting at which the question is asked will record the question and the fact that it has been taken on notice.
(ii) a written response will be provided to all Aldermen, at the appropriate time.
(iii) upon the answer to the question being circulated to Aldermen, both the question and the answer will be listed on the agenda for the next available ordinary meeting of the committee at which it was asked, where it will be listed for noting purposes only.
|
Agenda (Open Portion) City Planning Committee Meeting |
Page 345 |
|
15/5/2017 |
|