Minutes
Open Portion
Monday, 23 September 2019
AT 6:00 pm
Council Chamber, Town Hall
|
Minutes (Open Portion) Council Meeting |
Page 2 |
|
23/9/2019 |
|
PRESENT, APOLOGIES AND LEAVE OF ABSENCE
3. Communication from the Chairman
4. Notification of Council Workshops
7. Consideration of Supplementary Items
8. Indications of Pecuniary and Conflicts of Interest
9. Council Acting as Planning Authority
9.1 66 Alexander Street, Sandy Bay - Demolition and Two Multiple Dwellings
9.3 4 Turner Street, Sandy Bay - Two Multiple Dwellings (One Existing, One New)
9.4 2 and 4 Tara Street, South Hobart - Public Art Installation
9.5 4 Westinwood Road, Lenah Valley - Subdivision (One Additional Lot)
10. Petition to Amend Sealed Plan 152588 7, 9 & 12 Reid's Road, Fern Tree
Motions of which notice has been given
12. Condell Place Car Park - Redevelopment
Community, Culture and Events Committee
13. City of Hobart Public Art Framework
14. Draft Capital City Strategic Plan 2019-29 - Community Engagement
15. City of Hobart Grants Program - Annual Program 2019 Recommendations
Finance and Governance Committee
16. Local Government Legislative Framework Review
17. Council Policy Manual Review 2019
18. 2018-19 Annual Plan - Final Report
19. Southern Tasmania Council Authority Update
Parks and Recreation Committee
20. kunanyi / Mount Wellington - Proposed Visitor Centre at the Springs - Alternative Proposal
21. Domain Athletic Centre - Proposed Athletics Tasmania Master Plan
22. Elected Member Professional Development Councillor Ewin
Special Report – DEPUTY Lord Mayor
23. Elected Member Professional Development Lord Mayor Councillor Reynolds
Special Report – General Manager
24. International Urban Design Conference - Invitation for the Deputy Lord Mayor to Present
25. Closed Portion of the Meeting
|
Minutes (Open Portion) Council Meeting |
Page 4 |
|
23/09/2019 |
|
PRESENT:
The Lord Mayor Councillor A M Reynolds, Deputy Lord Mayor Councillor H Burnet, Aldermen M Zucco, J R Briscoe, D C Thomas, T M Denison, Councillor W F Harvey, Alderman S Behrakis, Councillors M S C Dutta, H A Ewin and Z R Sherlock.
APOLOGIES:
Nil.
LEAVE OF ABSENCE:
Alderman Dr P T Sexton.
Alderman Zucco left the meeting at 7.24pm after declaring an interest in item 9.7, returning at 7.29pm.
Alderman Briscoe left the meeting at 7.30pm and returned at 7.31pm.
Councillor Sherlock left the meeting at 7.31pm and returned at 7.33pm.
Councillor Harvey left the meeting at 7.42pm after declaring an interest in item 9.2, returning at 7.51pm.
Alderman Behrakis left the meeting at 7.42pm and returned at 7.44pm.
Alderman Dutta left the meeting at 8.37pm, returning at 8.57pm after the comfort break and was not present for items 14 and 15.
Alderman Denison retired from the meeting at 8.57pm and was not present for items 9.6, 10, 11 and 16 to 24 inclusive.
Councillor Sherlock left the meeting at 8.40pm at the commencement of the comfort break, returning at 8.58pm.
The Chairman reports that she has perused the minutes of the meeting of the Open Portion of the Council meeting held on Monday, 9 September 2019, finds them to be a true record and recommends that they be taken as read and signed as a correct record.
Harvey That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
MOTION CARRIED
VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
The minutes were then signed. |
Are there any items, which the meeting believes, should be transferred from this agenda to the closed agenda or from the closed agenda to the open agenda, in accordance with the procedures allowed under Section 15 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015?
No items were transferred.
Zucco
Briscoe That item 12 be taken after item 8.
MOTION CARRIED
VOTING RECORD
AYES |
NOES |
Lord Mayor Reynolds |
|
Deputy Lord Mayor Burnet |
|
Zucco |
|
Briscoe |
|
Thomas |
|
Denison |
|
Harvey |
|
Behrakis |
|
Dutta |
|
Ewin |
|
Sherlock |
|
No communication was received.
In accordance with the requirements of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015, the General Manager reports that no Council workshops have been conducted since the last ordinary meeting of the Council.
|
Mr Baird put the following question and was provided with the corresponding response by the Lord Mayor. Question: By Australian government standards probity is the evidence of ethical behaviour, and can be defined as complete and confirmed integrity, uprightness and honesty in a particular process. Can the council identify the processes for elected members who have pecuniary interest in a matter before the council to prevent them using their position to promote issues which directly benefit themselves, and how Aldermen are held accountable to these processes. Response:
Declarations of pecuniary and conflicts of interest are specifically dealt with under the Local Government Act 1993 and the Elected Member Code of Conduct, which is also available on the City’s website.
The Council process for dealing with conflicts of interest is in-line with Section 48 of the Act which states;
(1) A councillor must not participate at any meeting of a council, council committee, special committee, controlling authority, single authority or joint authority in any discussion, nor vote on any matter, in respect of which the councillor– (a) has an interest; or (b) is aware or ought to be aware that a close associate has an interest.
(2) A councillor must declare any interest that the councillor has in a matter before any discussion on that matter commences.
(3) On declaring that he or she has an interest, the councillor is to leave the room in which the meeting is being held.
(4) The councillor, by notice in writing, is to advise the general manager of the details of any interest that the councillor has declared under this section within 7 days of so declaring.
(5) The general manager is to – (a) ensure that the declaration of interest is recorded in the minutes of the meeting at which it is made; and (b) record the details of any interest declared in the register of interests kept under section 54 .
Additionally, section 53 of the Act states;
(1) Any person who considers that a councillor, member or member of an audit panel has an interest in a matter to be, or being, dealt with by a council, council committee, special committee, controlling authority or audit panel may notify the general manager in writing of that interest.
(2) On receipt of a notification, the general manager is to advise the following persons of the notification: (a) the councillor, member or member of an audit panel who is the subject of the notification; (b) all other councillors, members or members of the audit panel.
Also of relevance is section 52 which sets out when an elected member does not need to declare a pecuniary interest. There are limited cases where an interest does not need to be declared, generally where the financial benefit gained by any decision is in common with all or a substantial proportion of the electors of Hobart.
Early in the proceedings of each council or council committee meeting, the chair will call for declarations of pecuniary or conflicts of interest. It is the responsibility of each individual elected member to determine if they have a pecuniary interest and to declare that interest. This is listed as item 8 of tonight’s agenda. Under section 339E of the Act, failing to make a declaration can be dealt with a complaint to the Director of Local Government. Any person is able to make a complaint by writing to the Director. The penalty for not complying with section 48 could be up to 50 penalty units. The current value of a unit is $168. |
Burnet
DUTTA That item 9.7 be taken prior to item 9.1.
MOTION CARRIED
VOTING RECORD
AYES |
NOES |
Lord Mayor Reynolds |
|
Deputy Lord Mayor Burnet |
|
Zucco |
|
Briscoe |
|
Thomas |
|
Denison |
|
Harvey |
|
Behrakis |
|
Dutta |
|
Ewin |
|
Sherlock |
|
No petitions were received.
Ref: Part 2, Regulation 8(6) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015.
That the Council resolve to deal with any supplementary items not appearing on the agenda, as reported by the General Manager in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015.
No supplementary items were received.
|
Ref: Part 2, Regulation 8(7) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015.
Elected members are requested to indicate where they may have any pecuniary or conflicts of interest in respect to any matter appearing on the agenda, or any supplementary item to the agenda, which the Council has resolved to deal with.
The following interest was indicated:
1. Alderman Zucco - item 9.7
2. Councillor Harvey - item 9.2
Item 12 was then taken.
In accordance with the provisions of Part 2 Regulation 25 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015, the intention of the Council to act as a planning authority pursuant to the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993 is to be noted.
In accordance with Regulation 25, the Council will act as a planning authority in respect to those matters appearing under this heading on the agenda, inclusive of any supplementary items.
The Council is reminded that in order to comply with Regulation 25(2), the General Manager is to ensure that the reasons for a decision by a Council or Council Committee acting as a planning authority are recorded in the minutes.
9.1 66 Alexander Street, Sandy Bay - Demolition and Two Multiple Dwellings PLN-19-366 - File Ref: F19/120898 Ref: Open CPC 7.1.1, 16/09/2019 Application Expiry Date: 9 October 2019 Extension of Time: Not applicable |
|||||||||||||||
|
That pursuant to the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015, the Council refuse the application for Demolition and Two Multiple Dwellings at 66 Alexander Street, Sandy Bay for the following reasons: 1. The proposal does not meet the acceptable solution or the performance criteria with respect to clause E5.6.4 A1 and P1 of the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015 because the design, layout and location of the access, does not provide adequate sight distances to ensure the safe movement of vehicles, having regard to:
(a) The nature and frequency of the traffic generated by the use; (b) The frequency of use of the road network; (c) Any alternative access; (d) The need for the access; (e) Any traffic impact assessment; (f) Any measures to improve or maintain sight distance; and (g) Any written advice received from the road authority.
2. The proposal does not meet the acceptable solution or the performance criteria with respect to clause E6.7.2 A1 and P1 of the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015 because the design of the vehicle access point is not safe, efficient and convenient, having regard to all of the following:
(a) Avoidance of conflicts between users including vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians; (b) Avoidance of unreasonable interference with the flow of traffic on adjoining roads; (c) Suitability for the type and volume of traffic likely to be generated by the use or development; (d) Ease of accessibility and recognition for users.
3. The proposal does not meet the acceptable solution or the performance criteria with respect to clause E6.7.5 A1 and P1 of the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015 because the layout of car parking spaces, access aisles, circulation roadways and ramps is not safe and does not ensure ease of access, egress and manoeuvring on-site.
|
||||||||||||||
|
Ewin That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
Councillor Harvey declared an interest in item 9.2 and left the meeting.
9.2 9 Star Street and Adjacent Road Reserve, Sandy Bay - 12 Multiple Dwellings, Associated Hydraulic Infrastructure, Road Works (Extension to Star Street), Works in Road Reserve (Star Street and Jersey Street) PLN-18-721 - File Ref: F19/120971 Ref: Open CPC 7.1.2, 16/09/2019 Application Expiry Date: 25 September 2019 Extension of Time: Not applicable |
|||||||||||||||||
|
That pursuant to the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015, the Council refuse the application for multiple dwellings, associated hydraulic infrastructure, road works (extension to Star Street), works in road reserve (Star Street and Jersey Street) at 9 Star Street and adjacent road reserve, Sandy Bay for the following reasons:
1. The proposal does not meet the acceptable solution or the performance criterion with respect to clause 11.4.1 A1 and P1 (a) of the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015 because the proposed site area per dwelling of less than 200m2 does not contribute to a range of dwelling types and sizes appropriate to the locality or provide for a specific accommodation need such as aged care, special needs or student accommodation.
2. The proposal does not meet the acceptable solution or the performance criterion with respect to clause 11.4.2 A1 and P1 of the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015 because the setback of the dwelling from the frontage with Star Street and Jersey Street is not compatible with the relationship of existing buildings to the road in terms of setback or in response to other physical constraints of the site and does not have regard to streetscape qualities or assist the integration of new development into the streetscape.
3. The proposal does not meet the acceptable solution or the performance criterion with respect to clause 11.4.3 A1 and P1 of the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015 because the dwellings do not have private open space of a size and dimension that is appropriate for the size of the dwelling and is able to accommodate outdoor recreational space consistent with the projected requirements of the occupants, operational needs such as clothes drying and storage and reasonable space for the planting of gardens and landscaping. |
||||||||||||||||
|
Sherlock That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
9.3 4 Turner Street, Sandy Bay - Two Multiple Dwellings (One Existing, One New) PLN-19-294 - File Ref: F19/121842 Ref: Open CPC 7.1.3, 16/09/2019 Application Expiry Date: 8 October 2019 Extension of Time: Not applicable |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That pursuant to the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015, the Council approve the application for two multiple dwellings (one existing, one new) at 4 Turner Street, Sandy Bay for the reasons outlined in the officer’s report attached to item 7.1.3 of the Open City Planning Committee agenda of 16 September 2019 and a permit containing the following conditions be issued:
GEN
The use and/or development must be substantially in accordance with the documents and drawings that comprise PLN19294 4 TURNER STREET SANDY BAY TAS 7005 Attachment B Final Planning Documents except where modified below.
Reason for condition
To clarify the scope of the permit.
TW
The use and/or development must comply with the requirements of TasWater as detailed in the form Submission to Planning Authority Notice, Reference No. TWDA 2019/00709HCC dated 30/05/2019 as attached to the permit.
Reason for condition
To clarify the scope of the permit.
PLN 4
A Landscaping Plan must be submitted and approved by the Council’s Director City Planning prior to the issue of any consent under the Building Act 2016, excluding for excavation.
The Landscaping Plan must include:
1. Planting of mature vegetation along the entire length of the northeastern site boundary shared with 24 Byron Street. The vegetation along this boundary must have a height of approximately 2 metres at the time of planting and must grow to a height of at least 5 metres; 2. Planting of mature vegetation along the entire length of the southeastern site boundary shared with 22 Byron Street. The vegetation along this boundary must have a height of approximately 2 metres at the time of planting and must grow to a height of at least 3 metres; 3. Planting of mature vegetation along the entire length of the northwestern site boundary shared with 8 Fitzroy Place. The vegetation along this boundary must have a height of approximately 2 metres at the time of planting and must grow to a height of at least 3 metres; 4. Details of the species, number of plants and location of planting relative to the proposed dwelling, site boundaries and services.
All landscaping must be planted and installed in accordance with the approved Landscaping Plan to the satisfaction of the Council's Director City Planning prior to commencement of use.
The vegetation required by this condition must be maintained by the owners of the proposed dwelling, and replacement vegetation in accordance with the approved Landscaping Plan must be planted if any vegetation dies or is removed.
Reason for condition
To soften the appearance of the new building and to assist in reducing its impact upon the amenity of adjacent properties.
ENG sw1
All stormwater runoff from the proposed development (including but not limited to: roofed areas, ag drains, retaining wall ag drains and impervious surfaces such as driveways and paved areas) must be drained into the Council stormwater system prior to first occupation or commencement of use (whichever occurs first). All runoff from the site that can drain by gravity to the Council’s stormwater infrastructure (with either a freedraining or a charged system) must be allowed to do so.
Advice: Council will only approve stormwater pumping systems when absolutely necessary. It appears that the roof of the proposed dwelling can be drained by gravity, and also much of the driveway especially the existing & new paved areas which are to the NW of the proposed dwelling. If necessary new sewer and SW lot connections to the mains can be built at the lowest possible point within the property adjacent to the southeast boundary of the property (existing connections would need to be abandoned) this will provide the lowest possible connection points and assist the drainage of the new dwelling. Only one connection point to the sewer and SW mains is allowed per lot, so both existing and proposed dwellings will have to connect to the mains at the same point. Under section 23 of the Urban Drainage Act 2013 it is an offence for a property owner to direct stormwater onto a neighbouring property.
Reason for condition
To ensure that stormwater from the site will be discharged to a suitable Council approved outlet.
ENG sw4
If a new stormwater connection is required, it must be constructed (and existing connections to be abandoned sealed) by the Council at the owner’s expense, prior to the first occupation.
Detailed engineering drawings must be submitted and approved, prior to commencement of work. The drawings must include:
1. the location of the proposed connection; and 2. the size of the connection appropriate to satisfy the needs of the development.
All work required by this condition must be undertaken in accordance with the approved drawings.
Advice: The applicant is advised to submit drawings via a Council City Amenity Division application for a new stormwater connection. If detailed design to satisfy this condition is submitted via the planning condition endorsement process there may be fees associated with the assessment, and once approved the applicant will still need to submit an application for a new stormwater connection with Council City Amenity Division.
Where building / plumbing approval is also required, it is recommended that documentation to satisfy this condition is submitted well before submitting documentation for building/plumbing approval. Failure to address planning condition requirements prior to submitting for building/plumbing approval may result in unexpected delays.
Reason for condition
To ensure the site is drained adequately.
ENG 2a
Prior to first occupation or commencement of use (whichever occurs first), vehicular barriers compliant with the Australian Standard AS/NZS1170.1:2002 must be installed to prevent vehicles running off the edge of an access driveway or parking module (parking spaces, aisles and manoeuvring area) where the drop from the edge of the trafficable area to a lower level is 600mm or greater, and wheel stops (kerb) must be installed for drops between 150mm and 600mm. Barriers must not limit the width of the driveway access or parking and turning areas approved under the permit.
Advice: The Council does not consider a slope greater than 1 in 4 to constitute a lower level as described in AS/NZS 2890.1:2004 Section 2.4.5.3. Slopes greater than 1 in 4 will require a vehicular barrier or wheel stop. Designers are advised to consult the National Construction Code 2016 to determine if pedestrian handrails or safety barriers compliant with the NCC2016 are also required in the parking module this area may be considered as a path of access to a building.
Reason for condition
To ensure the safety of users of the access driveway and parking module and compliance with the standard.
ENG 3b
The design of the access driveway, parking and turning areas must be submitted and approved, prior to the issuing of any approval under the Building Act 2016.
The design must:
1. Be prepared and certified by a suitably qualified engineer, 2. Be generally in accordance with the Australian Standard AS/NZS2890.1:2004 (including the requirement for vehicle safety barriers where required), 3. Where the design deviates from AS/NZS2890.1:2004 the designer must demonstrate that the design will provide a safe and efficient access, and enable safe, easy and efficient use, 4. Show dimensions, levels, gradients, transitions and other details as Council deem necessary to satisfy the above requirement, 5. Clearly distinguish between existing and proposed driveway and parking areas, provide details of proposed parking area for the existing dwelling, also show details of any visitor parking spaces, 6. Show details of the existing and proposed entry into the property in plan view and front elevation, showing details and dimensions of any fencing and gates. The design of the entry must allow the free movement of vehicles into the parking areas of both existing and new dwellings. Fencing and gates must allow adequate visibility of pedestrians and vehicles in the road from within an exiting vehicle.
Reason for condition
To ensure the safety of users of the access, parking and turning areas, also compliance with the relevant Australian Standard.
ENG 4
The access driveway, parking and turning areas approved by this permit must be constructed to a sealed standard (spray seal, asphalt, concrete, pavers or equivalent Council approved) and surface drained to the Council's stormwater infrastructure prior to the first occupation / commencement of use.
Reason for condition
To ensure the safety of users of the access driveway and parking areas, and so that it does not detract from the amenity of users, adjoining occupiers or the environment by preventing dust, mud and sediment transport.
ENG 1
Any damage to council infrastructure resulting from the implementation of this permit, must, at the discretion of the Council:
1. Be met by the owner by way of reimbursement (cost of repair and reinstatement to be paid by the owner to the Council); or 2. Be repaired and reinstated by the owner to the satisfaction of the Council.
A photographic record of the Council's infrastructure adjacent to the subject site must be provided to the Council prior to any commencement of works.
A photographic record of the Council’s infrastructure (e.g. existing property service connection points, roads, buildings, stormwater, footpaths, driveway crossovers and nature strips, including if any, preexisting damage) will be relied upon to establish the extent of damage caused to the Council’s infrastructure during construction. In the event that the owner/developer fails to provide to the Council a photographic record of the Council’s infrastructure, then any damage to the Council's infrastructure found on completion of works will be deemed to be the responsibility of the owner.
Reason for condition
To ensure that any of the Council's infrastructure and/or siterelated service connections affected by the proposal will be altered and/or reinstated at the owner’s full cost.
ENV 1
Sediment and erosion control measures sufficient to prevent sediment from leaving the site must be installed prior to any disturbance of the site, and maintained until all areas of disturbance have been stabilized or revegetated.
Advice: For further guidance in preparing a Soil and Water Management Plan – in accordance with Fact sheet 3 Derwent Estuary Program click here.
Reason for condition
To avoid the sedimentation of roads, drains, natural watercourses, Council land that could be caused by erosion and runoff from the development, and to comply with relevant State legislation.
ADVICE
The following advice is provided to you to assist in the implementation of the planning permit that has been issued subject to the conditions above. The advice is not exhaustive and you must inform yourself of any other legislation, bylaws, regulations, codes or standards that will apply to your development under which you may need to obtain an approval. Visit the Council's website for further information.
Prior to any commencement of work on the site or commencement of use the following additional permits/approval may be required from the Hobart City Council.
CONDITION ENDORSEMENT PLANNING
If a condition endorsement is required by a planning condition above, you will need to submit the relevant documentation to satisfy the condition via the Condition Endorsement Submission on Council's online services eplanning portal.
Where building approval is also required, it is recommended that documentation for condition endorsement be submitted well before submitting documentation for building approval. Failure to address condition endorsement requirements prior to submitting for building approval may result in unexpected delays.
Once approved, the Council will respond to you via email that the condition has been endorsed (satisfied). Detailed instructions can be found here.
BUILDING PERMIT
You may need building approval in accordance with the Building Act 2016. Click here for more information.
This is a Discretionary Planning Permit issued in accordance with section 57 of the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993.
PLUMBING PERMIT
You may need plumbing approval in accordance with the Building Act 2016, Building Regulations 2016 and the National Construction Code. Click here for more information.
NEW SERVICE CONNECTION
If required, please contact the Hobart City Council's City Infrastructure Division to initiate the application process for your new stormwater connection.
STORMWATER
Please note that in addition to a building and/or plumbing permit, development must be in accordance with the Hobart City Council’s Hydraulic Services By law. Click here for more information.
WEED CONTROL
Effective measures are detailed in the Tasmanian Washdown Guidelines for Weed and Disease Control: Machinery, Vehicles and Equipment (Edition 1, 2004). The guidelines can be obtained from the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment website.
WORK PLACE HEALTH AND SAFETY
Appropriate occupational health and safety measures must be employed during the works to minimise direct human exposure to potentiallycontaminated soil, water, dust and vapours. Click here for more information.
NOISE REGULATIONS
Click here for information with respect to noise nuisances in residential areas.
WASTE DISPOSAL
It is recommended that the developer liaise with the Council’s Cleansing and Solid Waste Unit regarding reducing, reusing and recycling materials associated with demolition on the site to minimise solid waste being directed to landfill.
Further information regarding waste disposal can also be found on the Council’s website.
FEES AND CHARGES
Click here for information on the Council's fees and charges.
DIAL BEFORE YOU DIG
Click here for dial before you dig information.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Briscoe That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
9.4 2 and 4 Tara Street, South Hobart - Public Art Installation PLN-19-444 - File Ref: F19/120816 Ref: Open CPC 7.1.4, 16/09/2019 Application Expiry Date: 11 October 2019 Extension of Time: Not applicable |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That pursuant to the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015, the Council approve the application for a public art installation at 2 Tara Street and 4 Tara Street, South Hobart for the reasons outlined in the officer’s report attached to item 7.1.4 of the Open City Planning Committee agenda of 16 September 2019 and a permit containing the following conditions be issued:
GEN
The use and/or development must be substantially in accordance with the documents and drawings that comprise PLN19444 2 TARA STREET & 4 TARA STREET SOUTH HOBART TAS 7004 Final Planning Documents except where modified below.
Reason for condition
To clarify the scope of the permit.
OPS s1
The installation of the art works up the slope towards the cliffs must be done in a way that minimises ground disturbance and does not damage or destroy any native vegetation. Any damage to native flora must be reported to the City of Hobart Bushland Unit immediately.
Reason for condition
To protect native vegetation and minimise the risk of more weeds invading the park.
The following advice is provided to you to assist in the implementation of the planning permit that has been issued subject to the conditions above. The advice is not exhaustive and you must inform yourself of any other legislation, bylaws, regulations, codes or standards that will apply to your development under which you may need to obtain an approval. Visit the Council's website for further information.
Prior to any commencement of work on the site or commencement of use the following additional permits/approval may be required from the Hobart City Council.
BUILDING PERMIT
You may need building approval in accordance with the Building Act 2016. Click here for more information.
This is a Discretionary Planning Permit issued in accordance with section 57 of the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993.
WEED CONTROL
Effective measures are detailed in the Tasmanian Washdown Guidelines for Weed and Disease Control: Machinery, Vehicles and Equipment (Edition 1, 2004). The guidelines can be obtained from the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment website.
FEES AND CHARGES
Click here for information on the Council's fees and charges.
DIAL BEFORE YOU DIG
Click here for dial before you dig information.
HERITAGE
The Applicant is advised that the location of Sculptures 3, 4 and 5 sit within the bushland and thus beyond the focus of early industrial activity associated with this heritage precinct and its distinctive history. As such, the Applicant might wish to consider the use of timber support poles in these locations as opposed to steel as a more appropriate choice of material. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ewin That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
9.5 4 Westinwood Road, Lenah Valley - Subdivision (One Additional Lot) PLN-19-407 - File Ref: F19/120909 Ref: Open CPC 7.1.5, 16/09/2019 Application Expiry Date: 30 September 2019 Extension of Time: Not applicable |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Burnet Sherlock
That the recommendation contained in the officer’s report, marked as Attachment A to item 9.5 of the Open Council agenda of 23 September 2019, be adopted.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION LOST VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dutta
That pursuant to the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015, the Council approve the application for a subdivision (one additional lot) at 4 Westinwood Road, Lenah Valley for the reason that the proposed subdivision achieves reasonable minimum lot sizes and a permit containing the following conditions be issued:
GEN
Reason for condition
TW
ENG s1
ENG sw4
1. The location of the proposed connection; and 2. The size of the connection appropriate to satisfy the needs of the development.
Advice: · The applicant is advised to submit detailed design drawings via a Council City Amenity Division application for a new stormwater connection. If detailed design to satisfy this condition is submitted via the planning condition endorsement process there may be fees associated with the assessment, and once approved the applicant will still need to submit an application for a new stormwater connection with Council City Amenity Division. · Where building / plumbing approval is also required, it is recommended that documentation to satisfy this condition is submitted well before submitting documentation for building/plumbing approval. Failure to address planning condition requirements prior to submitting for building/plumbing approval may result in unexpected delays.
ENG 11 Prior to the sealing of the Final Plan of Subdivision, the proposed crossover widening to the Westinwood Road highway reservation must be designed and constructed in general accordance with: 1. LGAT Standard Drawing - Urban - TSD-R09-v1 – Urban Roads Driveways, TSD R14-v1 Type KC vehicular crossing, TSD-R11-v1 Urban Road Footpaths, or 2. A Council City Infrastructure Division approved alternate design.
· Local Government Association (LGAT) Tasmanian Standard Drawings (TSD) can be viewed electronically via the LGAT Website.
· Please note that your proposal does not include adjustment of footpath levels. Any adjustment to footpath levels necessary to suit the design of proposed floor, parking module or driveway levels will require separate agreement from Council's Road Services Engineer and may require further planning approvals. It is advised to place a note to this affect on construction drawings for the site and/or other relevant engineering drawings to ensure that contractors are made aware of this requirement. · Please contact Council City Infrastructure Division to discuss approval of alternate designs. Based on a site specific assessment, Council City Infrastructure Division Road Engineer may permit extending non-approved concrete slab crossover, and where non-standard kerb and channel exists a concrete plinth to Council standards may be permitted for construction at the gutter. · You are likely to require a Permit to Open Up and Temporarily Occupy a Highway (for work within the highway reservation). Click here for more information.
Any damage to council infrastructure resulting from the implementation of this permit, must, at the discretion of the Council: 1. Be met by the owner by way of reimbursement (cost of repair and reinstatement to be paid by the owner to the Council); or
2. Be repaired and reinstated by the owner to the satisfaction of the Council.
ENV 1
SURV 1
SURV 2
SURV 3
1. Over any proposed or existing storm water or sewer mains passing through the lots on the final plan, in favour of the Hobart City Council and/orTasWater (minimum width of 2m, or 3m if they cover two pipes). 2. Over any existing or proposed private rights of way or service easements in favour of the lots they are required to serve. 3. Over any existing Wayleave Easements in favour of TasNetworks
Reason for Condition
SURV 12
Any specified reduced level that may be required is to be provided by the owner’s Registered Land Surveyor who must supply the invert level (on State Datum) of the stormwater connection constructed to serve Lot 1 Reason for condition To ensure that the restriction in the Council’s ability to provide a means of gravity reticulated stormwater disposal is noted on the final plan. SURV 13
The final plan is to be notated in accordance with the provisions of section 83(7) (b) of the Local Government (Building & Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1993 to the effect that the Tasmanian Water and Sewerage Corporation cannot provide a means of gravity reticulated sewerage disposal from lot 1 below a specified reduced level.
The final plan must be submitted for approval by the Council.
The final plan must be notated to the satisfaction of the Council. The specified reduced level that may be required is to be provided by the owner’s Registered Land Surveyor who must supply the invert level (on State Datum) of the sewer connection constructed to serve Lot 1.
Reason for condition To ensure that the limitation in TasWater’s ability to provide a means of gravity reticulated sewerage disposal from Lot 1 is noted on the final plan. ENG 16
Prior to the sealing of the final plan, private sewer,
stormwater (including surface drainage) and water services/connections are to
be entirely separate to each lot and contained wholly within the lots served. Reason for condition To ensure that each lot is services separately. ENG 17
Prior to the sealing of the final plan, the developer
must verify compliance with condition ENG 16 by supplying the Council with an
as-installed services plan clearly indicating the location and details of all
relevant services (entirely contained within their respective lots or
appropriate easements). The as-installed services plan must be accompanied by
certification from a suitably qualified person that all engineering work
required by this permit has been completed. ENG r7
OPS 1
Reason for condition ADVICE
Prior to any commencement of work on the site or commencement of use the following additional permits/approval may be required from the Hobart City Council. NEW SERVICE CONNECTION
FEES AND CHARGES
DIAL BEFORE YOU DIG
PART 5 AGREEMENT
· implement the relevant requirements of the approved Bushfire Management Plan in relation to the property; · implement recommendations 4-8, 10-11 and 13-18 of the Geotechnical Assessment as relevant to the property; · comply with the Tree Protection Plan; · implement the Weed Management Plan; and · ensure development is in accordance with the Swift Parrot Protection Guidelines.
SUBDIVISION ADVICE For information regarding standards and guidelines for
subdivision works click here. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE - CASH IN LIEU VALUATION
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
COUNCIL RESOLUTION: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That pursuant to the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015, the Council approve the application for a subdivision (one additional lot) at 4 Westinwood Road, Lenah Valley for the reason that the proposed subdivision achieves reasonable minimum lot sizes and a permit containing the following conditions be issued:
GEN
TW
ENG s1
ENG sw4
1. The location of the proposed connection; and 2. The size of the connection appropriate to satisfy the needs of the development.
Advice: · The applicant is advised to submit detailed design drawings via a Council City Amenity Division application for a new stormwater connection. If detailed design to satisfy this condition is submitted via the planning condition endorsement process there may be fees associated with the assessment, and once approved the applicant will still need to submit an application for a new stormwater connection with Council City Amenity Division. · Where building / plumbing approval is also required, it is recommended that documentation to satisfy this condition is submitted well before submitting documentation for building/plumbing approval. Failure to address planning condition requirements prior to submitting for building/plumbing approval may result in unexpected delays.
The access strip approved by this permit must be
constructed to a sealed standard (spray seal, asphalt, concrete, pavers or
equivalent Council approved) and surface drained to the Council's
stormwater infrastructure prior to the sealing of the Final
Plan of Survey. ENG 11 Prior to the sealing of the Final Plan of Subdivision, the proposed crossover widening to the Westinwood Road highway reservation must be designed and constructed in general accordance with:
1. LGAT Standard Drawing - Urban - TSD-R09-v1 – Urban Roads Driveways, TSD R14-v1 Type KC vehicular crossing, TSD-R11-v1 Urban Road Footpaths, or 2. A Council City Infrastructure Division approved alternate design.
· Local Government Association (LGAT) Tasmanian Standard Drawings (TSD) can be viewed electronically via the LGAT Website. · Please note that your proposal does not include adjustment of footpath levels. Any adjustment to footpath levels necessary to suit the design of proposed floor, parking module or driveway levels will require separate agreement from Council's Road Services Engineer and may require further planning approvals. It is advised to place a note to this affect on construction drawings for the site and/or other relevant engineering drawings to ensure that contractors are made aware of this requirement. · Please contact Council City Infrastructure Division to discuss approval of alternate designs. Based on a site specific assessment, Council City Infrastructure Division Road Engineer may permit extending non-approved concrete slab crossover, and where non-standard kerb and channel exists a concrete plinth to Council standards may be permitted for construction at the gutter. · You are likely to require a Permit to Open Up and Temporarily Occupy a Highway (for work within the highway reservation). Click here for more information.
ENG 1 Any damage to council infrastructure resulting from the implementation of this permit, must, at the discretion of the Council: 1. Be met by the owner by way of reimbursement (cost of repair and reinstatement to be paid by the owner to the Council); or
2. Be repaired and reinstated by the owner to the satisfaction of the Council.
Reason for condition ENV 1
SURV 2
Reason for Condition SURV 3
1. Over any proposed or existing storm water or sewer mains passing through the lots on the final plan, in favour of the Hobart City Council and/orTasWater (minimum width of 2m, or 3m if they cover two pipes). 2. Over any existing or proposed private rights of way or service easements in favour of the lots they are required to serve. 3. Over any existing Wayleave Easements in favour of TasNetworks
Reason for Condition
SURV 12
Reason for condition To ensure that the restriction in the Council’s ability to provide a means of gravity reticulated stormwater disposal is noted on the final plan.
SURV 13
The final plan is to be notated in accordance with the provisions of section 83(7) (b) of the Local Government (Building & Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1993 to the effect that the Tasmanian Water and Sewerage Corporation cannot provide a means of gravity reticulated sewerage disposal from lot 1 below a specified reduced level.
The final plan must be submitted for approval by the Council.
The final plan must be notated to the satisfaction of the Council. The specified reduced level that may be required is to be provided by the owner’s Registered Land Surveyor who must supply the invert level (on State Datum) of the sewer connection constructed to serve Lot 1. Reason for condition To ensure that the limitation in TasWater’s ability to provide a means of gravity reticulated sewerage disposal from Lot 1 is noted on the final plan. ENG 16
Prior to the sealing of the final plan, private sewer,
stormwater (including surface drainage) and water services/connections are to
be entirely separate to each lot and contained wholly within the lots served. Reason for condition To ensure that each lot is services separately. ENG 17
Prior to the sealing of the final plan, the developer
must verify compliance with condition ENG 16 by supplying the Council with an
as-installed services plan clearly indicating the location and details of all
relevant services (entirely contained within their respective lots or
appropriate easements). The as-installed services plan must be accompanied by
certification from a suitably qualified person that all engineering work
required by this permit has been completed. Advice: Any final plan submitted for sealing will not be
processed unless it is accompanied by documentation by a suitably
qualified person that clearly certifies that this condition has been
satisfied and that all the work required by this condition has been
completed. A 'suitably qualified person' must be a Professional Engineer or
Professional Surveyor or other persons acceptable to Council.
ENG r7
OPS 1
Reason for condition ADVICE
NEW SERVICE CONNECTION
FEES AND CHARGES
DIAL BEFORE YOU DIG
PART 5 AGREEMENT
· implement the relevant requirements of the approved Bushfire Management Plan in relation to the property; · implement recommendations 4-8, 10-11 and 13-18 of the Geotechnical Assessment as relevant to the property; · comply with the Tree Protection Plan; · implement the Weed Management Plan; and · ensure development is in accordance with the Swift Parrot Protection Guidelines.
SUBDIVISION ADVICE
|
zucco
burnet That items 13, 14 and 15 be taken next.
MOTION CARRIED
VOTING RECORD
AYES |
NOES |
Lord Mayor Reynolds |
|
Deputy Lord Mayor Burnet |
|
Zucco |
|
Briscoe |
|
Thomas |
|
Denison |
|
Harvey |
|
Behrakis |
|
Dutta |
|
Ewin |
|
Sherlock |
|
Item 13 was then taken.
9.6 234 Elizabeth Street, 236-240 Elizabeth Street, 242-250 Elizabeth Street, Hobart - Archaeological Works PLN-19-308 - File Ref: F19/122360 Ref: Supplementary Open CPC 11, 16/09/2019 Application Expiry Date: 10 October 2019 Extension of Time: Not applicable |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That pursuant to the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015, the Council approve the application for archaeological works at 234, 236240 and 242250 Elizabeth Street Hobart TAS 7000 for the reasons outlined in the officer’s report attached to supplementary item 11 and a permit containing the following conditions be issued:
GEN
The use and/or development must be substantially in accordance with the documents and drawings that comprise PLN19308 234, 236240 AND 242 250 ELIZABETH STREET HOBART TAS 7000 Final Planning Documents except where modified below.
Reason for condition
To clarify the scope of the permit.
THC
The use and/or development must comply with the requirements of the Tasmanian Heritage Council as detailed in the Notice of Heritage Decision, THC Works Ref: 5933 dated 22 August 2019, as attached to the permit.
Reason for condition
To clarify the scope of the permit.
ENV 1
Implement the 'Soil and Water Management Plan' (SWMP) developed by Environmental Management & Consulting Pty Ltd and dated 8 July 2019 for the duration of the works associated with the development.
Reason for condition
To avoid the pollution and sedimentation of roads, drains and natural watercourses that could be caused by erosion and runoff from the development.
HER 10
Test trenching is to be limited to an area of 100 square metres with four (4), 5m x 5m sites proposed. An increase of 50% of the total test trenching area is acceptable as is a variation of the test trenching to additional smaller, linear test trenches to an area no greater than 150 square metres once Council is notified and approval issued by Council's Cultural Heritage Officer.
Reason for condition
To ensure that excavation at a place of archaeological potential is appropriately managed.
HER 11
Test trench 4 in the carpark of the business ABS Automotive Centre is to occur at times to allow the business to operate. Consideration is to be given to the following options to lessen the impact:
· limiting the size of the test trench · undertaking the test trenching outside of business hours · redesigning the test trenching to a larger number of smaller trenches excavated over different time intervals.
Reason for condition
To ensure that excavation at a place of archaeological potential is appropriately managed.
HER 12
A revised figure 5.1 (page 106 Praxis report) is to be submitted to Council showing all features (walls) as depicted in the 1851 plan for sale of the Robinson land (figure 4.12, page 80 Praxis report).
The revised plan must be submitted and approved by Council prior to the commencement of excavation in accordance with the above requirement.
Reason for condition
To ensure that excavation at a place of archaeological potential is appropriately managed.
HER 6
All test trenching is to be undertaken in accordance with the Archaeological Method Statement (pages 107111) of the Praxis Report.
Reason for condition
To ensure that excavation at a place of archaeological potential is appropriately managed.
ADVICE
The following advice is provided to you to assist in the implementation of the planning permit that has been issued subject to the conditions above. The advice is not exhaustive and you must inform yourself of any other legislation, bylaws, regulations, codes or standards that will apply to your development under which you may need to obtain an approval. Visit the Council's website for further information.
Prior to any commencement of work on the site or commencement of use the following additional permits/approval may be required from the Hobart City Council.
HERITAGE
The applicants are to consult with Aboriginal Heritage Tasmania and the Aboriginal Community with regards to relevant and related findings, conclusions and recommendations of the 'Historic Heritage Management Strategy for 234250 Elizabeth Street, Hobart' by Praxis Environment (Brad Williams) dated January 2017 and updated January 2018 with a Heritage Impact Assessment dated May 2017 and the report Archaeological Test Trenching Proposal by Praxis, dated May 2019.
All test trenching sites, site offices and other equipment must be secured and made safe.
The applicant must explore meaningful and safe ways in which members of the public view, understand and appreciate the site and the archaeological process.
The consultant is to provide Council with clarification as to what access/release protocols are required should Council be requested to release any report on the archaeological test trenching works once submitted to Council in accordance with the public benefit section of the Archaeological Method Statement (page 110) of the Praxis report.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ewin That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
Item 10 was then taken.
Alderman Zucco declared an interest in item 9.7 and left the meeting.
9.7 346-352 Elizabeth Street, and Adjacent Road Reserve, North Hobart - Partial Demolition, Alterations and Partial Change of Use to General Retail and Hire File Ref: F19/124758; PLN-19-298 Ref: Special Open CPC 2.1.1, 23/09/2019 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
That pursuant to the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015, the Council approve the application for partial demolition, alterations and partial change of use to general retail and hire at 346-352 Elizabeth Street and adjacent road reserve, North Hobart for the reasons outlined in the officer’s report attached to item 2.1.1 of the Special Open City Planning Committee agenda of 23 September 2019 and a permit containing the following conditions be issued:
GEN
PLN 6
The use must not be open to the public outside of the
following hours:
PLN s1
Reason for condition
PLN s2
ENG 1
1. Be met by the owner by way of reimbursement (cost of repair and reinstatement to be paid by the owner to the Council); or 2. Be repaired and reinstated by the owner to the satisfaction of the Council.
ENG s2
1. Detail any services or infrastructure (ie light poles, pits, awnings) at or near the proposed works. 2. Relocation of any services. 3. Long sections and cross sections of the footpath. 4. Protection of public infrastructure. 5. Be prepared and certified by a suitable qualified person, to satisfy the above requirement.
· The applicant is required submit detailed design documentation to satisfy this condition via Council's planning condition endorsement process (noting there is a fee associated with condition endorsement approval of engineering drawings [see general advice on how to obtain condition endorsement and for fees and charges]). This is a separate process to any building approval under the Building Act 2016. · Failure to address condition endorsement requirements prior to submitting for building approval may result in unexpected delays. · A road opening permit will be required.
ENV 1
ADVICE
Prior to any commencement of work on the site or commencement
of use the following additional permits/approval may be required from the
Hobart City Council. CONDITION ENDORSEMENT ENGINEERING
· Up to $20,000: $150 per application. · Over $20,000: 2% of the value of the works as assessed by the City's Engineer per assessment.
BUILDING PERMIT
PLUMBING PERMIT
OCCUPATION OF THE PUBLIC HIGHWAY
PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE
WORK WITHIN THE HIGHWAY RESERVATION
WASTE DISPOSAL
FEES AND CHARGES
DIAL BEFORE YOU DIG
COMMERCIAL DELIVERIES
In the event that it is not possible for a 6 tonne medium rigid truck to access the site via Condell Place and Little Arthur Street, alternative arrangements for all deliveries to be made by van should be made. |
||||||||||||||||
|
Briscoe That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
Item 9.1 was then taken.
10. Petition to Amend Sealed Plan 152588 File Ref: F19/114557; D0806.01/02 Ref: Supplementary Open CPC 13, 16/09/2019 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That pursuant to section 103 of the Local Government (Building and Miscellaneous) Provisions Act 1993, the Council approve the petition to amendment Sealed Plan 152588 as outlined in Attachment A to supplementary item 13 of the Open City Planning Committee agenda of 16 September 2019. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Briscoe That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
IN ACCORDANCE WITH REGULATION 16(5) OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT (MEETING PROCEDURES) REGULATIONS 2015
File Ref: F19/108610; s13-001-09 Ref: Open CCEC 7.1, 11/09/2019 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Councillors Ewin, Sherlock, Harvey, Deputy Lord Mayor Burnet, Councillor Dutta and Lord Mayor Reynolds Motion: “That the City of Hobart notes that the low rate of Newstart payments exacerbates poverty and homelessness; therefore: 1. The Council note that a number of elected members have signed a submission which has been forwarded to the senate enquiry into the “Adequacy of Newstart and related payments and alternative mechanisms to determine the level of income support payments in Australia.” 2. The General Manager provide further advice on how to best address the issue within the Council’s current governance structure. 3. The Council condemns the proposed introduction of a cashless welfare card and drug testing of welfare recipients.”
Rationale: “The intent of this motion is to support the Functions and Powers as stated in the Local Government Act 1993, in particular, Section 20 (3) of the Act outlines clearly that advocating for our community is part of our function and power. In particular S. 20 (3) states that our function is to: (3) A council may do anything necessary or convenient to perform its functions either within or outside its municipal area. With this as a guiding principle, the Act further expands on how a Councillor may go about performing these functions, in particular, we note Section 20 (2) which clearly states: (2) In performing its functions, a council is to consult, involve and be accountable to the community.
In summary, as indicated by document in 2018, entitled A Guide For Prospective Councillors, "Councils are elected to provide leadership for, and the good governance of, the municipal area. In performing their functions, councils are required to consult, involve and be accountable to the community. They must consider the diverse needs of the local community in their decision-making, setting and monitoring strategic objectives and in ensuring resources are managed in a responsible manner." As per Section 20 (1) (g), the intent of this motion is to represent and promote the interests of the community. This particular motion, then, has been supported by eleven local councils in South Australia and Victoria. This is not a motion that is not within the functions and powers of the HCC but marries advocacy via promotion of community interests. Newstart, at $269 per week, is $177 per week below the Henderson poverty line. It is less than 41 percent of the minimum wage, less than 18 percent of the average wage, and has not been raised in real terms since 1994. The Newstart payment is the second lowest in the developed world. An Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS) survey of 600 Newstart recipients in 2015 reported: ■ 40% are unable to pay their bills on time; ■ 40% are unable to see a dentist; ■ 50% are unable to raise $2,000 in the event of an emergency; ■ 50% are turning off heating and cooling to save money; ■ 32% skipped meals in the previous year; ■ 25% are suffering from severe housing stress — spending more than half their income on rent; and ■ 20% do not have enough money for essentials like housing, food and electricity. One of the reasons Newstart is so low is that it is intended as a temporary payment while people are between jobs. However, according to figures released by the Government, the average time spent on Newstart is over four years. This is largely due to the lack of jobs available. According to the latest government data, there are 2.8 million people competing for only 180,000 jobs. Newstart has become a one-way ticket to entrenched poverty. We also know that the low rate of Newstart is a major factor pushing people into homelessness. According to a 2017 study by Anglicare, only .03% of all properties on the national market are affordable for a single person living on Newstart. There is also a growing problem of Newstart recipients with disabilities being unable to afford the medicines they need. 25% of Newstart recipients have a diagnosed disability. This is because of significant attacks over the past several years on the ability to access the Disability Support Pension (DSP). Increasing the Newstart rate to the Henderson Poverty Line ($1026.24 per fortnight) – the most reliable and regularly updated measure of poverty in Australia – will go a long way to giving Newstart recipients control over their lives, helping them out of poverty, and enabling them to participate in meaningful community life. Increasing Newstart would benefit local economies. By increasing the spending power of those on low incomes, extra funds would circulate through local businesses. It would also reduce the strain on Council community services assisting the growing number of people experiencing hardship, particularly homelessness. Experts in this area frequently point out that the low rate of Newstart contributes to crime, mental health issues, and creates an extra strain on council and health services. Increasing Newstart will not only help people into employment, but create a more prosperous community. There are thousands of unemployed people in the Hobart LGA who need our representation and advocacy. The Business Council of Australia has advocated to the Federal government that the low rate of Newstart is a barrier to employment and risks entrenching poverty. Auditing company KPMG and the OECD have also advocated for an increase in Newstart, as well as the community sector. Already there is a ground swell of local councils who have taken up this issue. Nineteen local councils across Australia have already passed similar motions declaring their support for raising Newstart. ALGA also passed a motion in June 2018 calling on the Federal Government to raise Newstart. Advocacy for our community is important now, as ever. Since June 2018 we have had a Federal election, and the subject of Newstart is once again the subject of Parliamentary discussion. The more councils who adopt this demand, the more pressure can be applied on the Federal government to do the right thing by our community. References and resources: ABS data on average wages https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/6302.0?opendocument&ref=HPKI ACOSS data on Newstart poverty https://www.acoss.org.au/media_release/budget_must_not_forget_the_unemployed_83_dont_have_enough_to_live_on/ Anglicare Rental Affordability Snapshot- 0.03% of properties affordable to people on Newstart https://www.anglicare.asn.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/rental-affordability-snapshot-2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4
Australian Unemployed Workers Union- Jobseekers vs. available jobs data http://unemployedworkersunion.com/job-seekers-v-job-vacancy-data/ DHS- Disability Support Pension information https://www.humanservices.gov.au/individuals/services/centrelink/disability-support-pension Fair Work Australia- info on minimum wages, cost of living https://www.fairwork.gov.au/how-we-will-help/templates-and-guides/fact-sheets/minimum-workplace-entitlements/minimum-wages#current-national-minimum-wage KPMG and OECD calling for increase in Newstart https://www.acoss.org.au/media_release/kpmg-repeats-its-call-for-an-increase-to-newstart/#_ftn1 Melbourne Institute- Applied Economic and Social Research: Poverty Lines Australia https://melbourneinstitute.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/2540471/Poverty-lines-Australia-June-2017.pdf National Social Security Rights Network- ¼ of Newstart recipients has a significant disability http://www.nssrn.org.au/social-security-rights-review/1-in-4-on-newstart-has-a-significant-disability/.”
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Sherlock
That the recommendation be adopted with an amendment to clause 1 to read:
1. The Council make a submission to the senate enquiry into the “Adequacy of Newstart and related payments and alternative mechanisms to determine the level of income support payments in Australia.” |
||||||||||||||||
|
Harvey
That the vote for clause 1 and 2 be taken together and 3 separately.
VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||
|
The Chair then put clause 1 and 2. |
||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||
|
The Chair then put clause 3. |
||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION LOST VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||
|
COUNCIL RESOLUTION: |
||||||||||||||||
|
That the City of Hobart notes that the low rate of Newstart payments exacerbates poverty and homelessness; therefore: 1. The Council make a submission to the senate enquiry into the “Adequacy of Newstart and related payments and alternative mechanisms to determine the level of income support payments in Australia.” 2. The General Manager provide further advice on how to best address the issue within the Council’s current governance structure. |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Item 16 was them taken.
12. Condell Place Car Park - Redevelopment File Ref: F19/113809; s13-001-09 Ref: Open FGC 7.1, 17/09/2019 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Alderman Zucco Motion: “That: 1. An urgent report be prepared
addressing any issues for the Council immediately pursuing expressions of
interest for the redevelopment of the Condell carpark in North Hobart, as per
the most recent report to Council (as attached to the agenda for the Finance
and Governance Committee meeting held on 17 July 2018). 2. A further report to also address the broader parking, mobility and smart cities issues and solutions for North Hobart (as per the Council decision of 23 July 2018). 3. The report to consider any other existing report relevant to the development of car parking within the North Hobart precinct. 4. The Council’s preferred position be subject to community engagement at the appropriate time.”
Rationale:
“The Finance and Governance Committee considered a report at its meeting held on 17 July 2018 proposing a formal expression of interest process be undertaken for the development of the Condell Place Car Park site with the provision that submissions must include a provision for expansion of the number of parking spaces in the car park.
The report outlined that the provision of additional parking will be looked upon favourable by business owners and patrons of the North Hobart are with the North Hobart Traders Association commenting that they believed the only way to provide an adequate parking supply is be developing existing land/property.
Whilst some measures have been implemented to improve parking availability in the area, it was disappointing that when the Council considered this report it resolved to seek another report consolidating information in relation to the Condell Place site rather than taking action.
North Hobart is one of Hobart’s premier dining locations playing host to a significant number of patrons on a daily basis – the required infrastructure needs to be in place to cater for this demand.”
The General Manager reports:
“In line with the Council’s policy in relation to Notices of Motion, I advise that the matter is considered to be within the jurisdiction of the Hobart City Council as it relates to Council property.”
Zucco Behrakis That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sherlock
That Alderman Zucco be granted an additional two minutes to address the meeting. MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dutta
That Councillor Harvey be granted an additional 30 seconds to address the meeting. MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lord Mayor Reynolds vacated the chair.
Deputy Lord Mayor Burnet assumed the chair.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reynolds
That the vote for clause 1 and 2 be taken separately with clause 3 and 4 taken together.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION LOST VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deputy Lord Mayor Burnet vacated the chair.
Lord Mayor Reynolds resumed the chair.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
COUNCIL RESOLUTION: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That: 1. An
urgent report be prepared addressing any issues for the Council immediately
pursuing expressions of interest for the redevelopment of the Condell carpark
in North Hobart, as per the most recent report to Council (as attached to the
agenda for the Finance and Governance Committee meeting held on 17 July
2018). 2. A further report to also address the broader parking, mobility and smart cities issues and solutions for North Hobart (as per the Council decision of 23 July 2018). 3. The report to consider any other existing report relevant to the development of car parking within the North Hobart precinct. 4. The Council’s preferred position be subject to community engagement at the appropriate time.
|
Item 9.7 was then taken.
13. City of Hobart Public Art Framework File Ref: F19/37398; 19/44-0001 Ref: Open CCEC 6.1, 11/09/2019 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That: 1. The Council adopt the proposed new City of Hobart Public Art Framework marked as Attachment A to item 6.1 of the Open Community Culture and Events Committee agenda of 11 September 2019. 2. An increase of $100,000 to the annual Public Art Fund be included for consideration in the 2020-21 budget preparation and ongoing. (i) An allocation of $43,800 per annum from this allocation would be utilised in 2020-21 and 2021-22 for the two-year Signal Box Project (50 traffic signal boxes painted over this two year period). 3. The additional Public Art Fund allocation be able to be accrued across several financial years to enable the realisation of larger projects. 4. The Council list for consideration an ongoing one percent of the annual City of Hobart new capital works budget for public art. (i) The allocation be able to accumulate across financial years, and expenditure of the allocation to go towards the inclusion of public art in major and/or significant capital works projects. 5. That consideration be given regarding a process to make amendments to the 2015 Interim Planning Scheme, and any subsequent schemes, to include a mandatory requirement for developments valued at or above $3,000,000 to contribute 1 per cent of the value to public art on the development site or in public space within specific zones (Sullivans Cove, Central Business Zone, Commercial Zone). Details of this process would be presented in a future report to Council prior to implementation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EWIN That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sherlock That the vote for clause 5 be taken separately.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Procedural Motion
Dutta
That clause 5 be deferred back to the Planning Committee for further consideration.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Chair rejected the procedural motion for the reason that the motion before the meeting would achieve the same outcome. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Chair then put the motion to separate the vote. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION LOST VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amendment
Zucco
That clause 5 be amended so that the 1 per cent contribution be put towards funding crisis accommodation and homelessness rather than public art.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
AMENDMENT LOST VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
14. Draft Capital City Strategic Plan 2019-29 - Community Engagement File Ref: F19/116222; 17/198 Ref: Open CCEC 6.2, 11/09/2019 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That the Council adopt the City of Hobart Capital City Strategic Plan 2019-29 marked as Attachment B to item 6.2 of the Open Community Culture and Events Committee agenda of 11 September 2019. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Burnet That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
15. City of Hobart Grants Program - Annual Program 2019 Recommendations File Ref: F19/116111 Ref: Open CCEC 6.3, 11/09/2019 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That: 1. The Council approve the recommended level of funding to the respective applicants for assistance under the 2019-20 City of Hobart Grants Program, marked as Attachments A and B to item 6.3 of the Open Community Culture and Events Committee agenda of 11 September 2019, under the streams of Creative Hobart Major Cultural Organisations and Event Partnerships. 2. The Council note the projects not recommended for funding from this round of the City of Hobart Grants Program as detailed in Attachments A and B to item 6.3 of the Open Community Culture and Events Committee agenda of 11 September 2019. 3. The value of the combined recommended projects is noted as: · $40,000 for Creative Hobart Major Cultural Organisations, and · $300,000 for Event Partnerships. 4. There are no unallocated funds remaining from either grant streams within the 2019-20 financial year. 5. The funding for the grants be attributed to the Activation and Events Budget Function in the 2019-20 Annual Plan. 6. All funding applicants be advised accordingly. 7. The total grant provision be recorded in the ‘Grants, Assistance and Benefits provided’ section of the City of Hobart’s Annual Report. 8. The provision of triennial funding agreements for Event Partnerships be removed from the policy, taking effect from the 2020-21 financial year. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thomas That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED
VOTING RECORD
|
Item 9.6 was then taken.
16. Local Government Legislative Framework Review File Ref: F19/121549; 15/153-201 Ref: Open FGC 6.1, 17/09/2019 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That: 1. The Council adopt the positions in respect of each Reform Direction identified in the table in Attachment B to item 6.1 of the Open Finance and Governance Committee agenda of 17 September 2019, as amended and set out in the memorandum marked as Attachment A to item 16 of the Open Council agenda of 23 September 2019.
2. The General Manager be authorised to provide a submission to the Local Government Legislation Review conveying the Council’s position as adopted.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sherlock That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amendment
Ewin
That the following amendments be made and the vote for each be taken separately:
1. Reform option 13 – the Council not support the concept of introducing a candidate fee.
2. Reform option 29 – revert to the Officer’s recommendation contained in Attachment B to item 6.1 of the Open Finance and Governance Committee agenda of 17 September 2019.
3. Reform option 37 – revert to the Officer’s recommendation contained in Attachment B to item 6.1 of the Open Finance and Governance Committee agenda of 17 September 2019.
4. Reform option 39 – revert to the Officer’s recommendation contained in Attachment B to item 6.1 of the Open Finance and Governance Committee agenda of 17 September 2019.
5. Reform option 40 – revert to the Officer’s recommendation contained in Attachment B to item 6.1 of the Open Finance and Governance committee agenda of 17 September 2019.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Chair then put the motion to separate the vote. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Chair then put clause 1 of the amendment. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
AMENDMENT CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Chair then put clause 2 of the amendment. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
AMENDMENT CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Chair then put clause 3 of the amendment. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Chair then put clause 4 of the amendment. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Chair then put clause 5 of the amendment. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
SUBSTANTIVE MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
COUNCIL RESOLUTION: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That: 1. The Council adopt the positions in respect of each Reform Direction identified in the table in Attachment B to item 6.1 of the Open Finance and Governance Committee agenda of 17 September 2019, as amended and set out in the memorandum marked as Attachment A to item 16 of the Open Council agenda of 23 September 2019 together with the following amendments:
2. The General Manager be authorised to provide a submission to the Local Government Legislation Review conveying the Council’s position as adopted.
|
17. Council Policy Manual Review 2019 File Ref: F19/121485 Ref: Open FGC 6.2, 17/09/2019 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That: 1. The Council endorse the schedule of Council Policies, as shown in Attachment A to item 6.2 of the Open Finance and Governance Committee agenda of 17 September 2019 with the exception of the Elected Members’ Development and Support policy (marked as Appendix 10). 2. A portion of the policy portfolio be reviewed every six months such that all policies are reviewed within a two year period. 3. The Elected Members’ Development and Support policy be referred back to committee for further consideration to include investigation of the policy positions of other capital cities with regards international travel. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sherlock That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
VOTING RECORD
|
18. 2018-19 Annual Plan - Final Report File Ref: F19/102440 Ref: Open FGC 6.3, 17/09/2019 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That the Council endorse the Annual Plan Final Report for the period ending 30 June 2019, marked as Attachment A to item 6.3 of the Open Finance and Governance Committee agenda of 17 September 2019. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Burnet That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
19. Southern Tasmania Council Authority Update File Ref: F19/120777; 18/17 Ref: Open FGC 6.5, 17/09/2019 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That: 1 The update on the activities on the Southern Tasmania Council Authority as detailed in the memorandum marked as item 6.5 on the Open Finance and Governance Committee agenda of 17 September 2019 be noted. 2. The Council consider those proposed infrastructure projects that may be beneficial to the region. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sherlock That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
20. kunanyi / Mount Wellington - Proposed Visitor Centre at the Springs - Alternative Proposal File Ref: F19/39897; 18/12 Ref: Open PRC 6.2, 12/09/2019 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
That: 1. The Springs Visitor Centre Concept as developed to date, not be progressed. 2. Comprehensive assessment and feasibility assessment be undertaken into the Halls Saddle site to establish its potential role as the primary road-based gateway entrance facility for servicing visitor access to the mountain.
3. This work to involve: (i) Concept development – including confirming required site functions and feasibility assessment. (ii) Site master planning to ensure any required functions can fit within the site. (iii) A transport / access analysis – including the site’s potential role in providing for a regular mountain bus service. (iv) Determination of infrastructure and services requirements at the site. (v) Compliance with planning scheme, including bushfire risk requirements. (vi) Preparation of a high level assessment of the financial investment required to develop the Halls Saddle site as proposed. (vii) The identification of potential grant funding and other external funding opportunities that could provide the investment required to develop the Halls Saddle site. 4. The costs associated with the work to investigate the Halls Saddle concept, estimated to be in the order of $100,000 be allocated from the 2019-2020 Bushland Capital Works budget. 5. A report be provided on the findings of the above for the Council’s consideration by February 2020. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
BURNET That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
21. Domain Athletic Centre - Proposed Athletics Tasmania Master Plan File Ref: F19/109728 Ref: Open PRC 6.4, 12/09/2019 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That the Draft Domain Athletic Centre Master Plan, as prepared by Athletics Tasmania, marked as Attachment A to item 6.4 of the Open Parks and Recreation Committee agenda of 12 September 2019 be endorsed to allow key user groups and wider community engagement to be undertaken. (i) Following community engagement and feedback, the draft master plan for the site be referred back for the Council’s approval to allow Athletics Tasmania to seek to secure external grant funding for the development. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thomas That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
23. Elected Member Professional Development File Ref: F19/124062 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Burnet Dutta
That the recommendation contained in the report of the Deputy Lord Mayor be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
COUNCIL RESOLUTION: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That the Professional Development Plan for the Lord Mayor Councillor Reynolds, as attached to the Open Council Agenda of 23 September 2019, be received and noted.
|
24. International Urban Design Conference - Invitation for Alderman Denison to Present File Ref: F19/122435 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Burnet Dutta
That the recommendation contained in the report of the General Manager be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOTION CARRIED VOTING RECORD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
COUNCIL RESOLUTION: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That: 1. In accordance with Section D of the Elected Member Development and Support Policy, Alderman Denison be approved to represent the City as a speaker at the International Urban Design Conference to be held in Hobart in on 13-16 November 2019 in relation to the topic of collaborative placemaking and how Hobart’s local retail precinct projects have been developed in partnership with local communities. 2. The costs of registration of $1025 be attributed to the Elected Member Allowances and Expenses Function of the Annual Plan 2019-20.
|
That the Council resolve by absolute majority that the meeting be closed to the public pursuant to regulation 15(1) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015 because the items included on the closed agenda contain the following matters:
· Leave of Absence; · Legal action taken by, or involving the Council; · Information provided to the Council on the condition it is kept confidential; · Proposal for the disposal of land; and · Renewal of lease.
The following items were discussed:-
Item No. 1 Minutes of the last meeting of the Closed Portion of the Council Meeting Item No. 2 Communication from the Chairman Item No. 3 Leave of Absence Item No. 4 Consideration of supplementary Items to the agenda Item No. 5 Indications of pecuniary and conflicts of interest Item No. 6.1 2 Castray Esplanade, Battery Point - Partial Demolition, Alterations, Extension and Partial Change of Use to Visitor Accommodation - Appeal - PLN-18-413 LG(MP)R 15(4)(a) Item No. 7 Proposal - Safe Night Space LG(MP)R 15(2)(g) Item No. 8 Sale of Land for Unpaid Rates: 5/646 Sandy Bay Road - Update LG(MP)R 15(2)(f) and (g) Item No. 9 Council Rates - Methods of Payment LG(MP)R 15(2)(d) Item No. 10 Proposed Acquisition of 74 Risdon Road, New Town and Disposal of Lot 104, Wilmslow Avenue, New Town LG(MP)R 15(2)(f) Item No. 11 Swan Street Park, North Hobart - Lease from Uniting Church LG(MP)R 15(2)(f) Item No. 12 Hobart City Deal - Implementation Plan LG(MP)R 15(2)(g) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Dutta That the recommendation be adopted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
MOTION CARRIED BY AN ABSOLUTE MAJORITY VOTING RECORD
|
The Chairman adjourned the meeting at 8.40 pm for a comfort break.
The meeting was reconvened at 8.57 pm.
There being no further business the open portion of the meeting closed at 9.45pm.
TAKEN AS READ AND SIGNED AS A CORRECT RECORD
THIS
7th DAY OF october 2019.
CHAIRMAN