HCC Coat of Arms.jpg
City of hobart

 

 

 

 

AGENDA

City Planning Committee Meeting

 

Open Portion

 

Monday, 3 May 2021

 

at 5:00 pm

Council Chamber, Town Hall


 

 

 

 

THE MISSION

Working together to make Hobart a better place for the community. 

THE VALUES

The Council is:

 

People

We care about people – our community, our customers and colleagues.

Teamwork

We collaborate both within the organisation and with external stakeholders drawing on skills and expertise for the benefit of our community. 

Focus and Direction

We have clear goals and plans to achieve sustainable social, environmental and economic outcomes for the Hobart community. 

Creativity and Innovation

We embrace new approaches and continuously improve to achieve better outcomes for our community. 

Accountability

We are transparent, work to high ethical and professional standards and are accountable for delivering outcomes for our community. 

 

 


 

Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 3

 

3/5/2021

 

 

ORDER OF BUSINESS

 

Business listed on the agenda is to be conducted in the order in which it is set out, unless the committee by simple majority determines otherwise.

 

APOLOGIES AND LEAVE OF ABSENCE

1.        Co-Option of a Committee Member in the event of a vacancy  4

2.        Confirmation of Minutes. 4

3.        Consideration of Supplementary Items. 4

4.        Indications of Pecuniary and Conflicts of Interest. 5

5.        Transfer of Agenda Items. 5

6.        Planning Authority Items - Consideration of Items With Deputations. 5

7.        Committee Acting as Planning Authority. 6

7.1     Applications under the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015  7

7.1.1       76 Liverpool Street, Hobart - Partial Demolition, Alterations and Signage  7

8.        Reports. 209

8.1     Proposal to amend the Southern Tasmania Regional Land Use Strategy by Extending the Urban Growth Boundary at 69 Brighton Road, Brighton. 209

8.2     Delegated Decision Report (Planning) 274

8.3     City Planning - Advertising Report 278

9.        Questions Without Notice. 283

10.     Closed Portion Of The Meeting.. 284

 


 

Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 4

 

3/5/2021

 

 

City Planning Committee Meeting (Open Portion) held Monday, 3 May 2021 at 5:00 pm in the Council Chamber, Town Hall.

 

This meeting of the City Planning Committee is held in accordance with a Notice issued by the Premier on 3 April 2020 under section 18 of the COVID-19 Disease Emergency (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2020.

 

COMMITTEE MEMBERS

Deputy Lord Mayor Burnet (Chairman)

Briscoe

Harvey

Behrakis

Dutta

Coats

 

NON-MEMBERS

Lord Mayor Reynolds

Zucco

Sexton

Thomas

Ewin

Sherlock

Apologies:

 

 

Leave of Absence:

 

1.       Co-Option of a Committee Member in the event of a vacancy

 

 

 

2.       Confirmation of Minutes

 

The minutes of the Open Portion of the City Planning Committee meeting held on Monday, 19 April 2021 and the Special City Planning Committee meeting held on Monday, 26 April 2021, are submitted for confirming as an accurate record.

 

 

 

 

3.       Consideration of Supplementary Items

Ref: Part 2, Regulation 8(6) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015.

Recommendation

 

That the Committee resolve to deal with any supplementary items not appearing on the agenda, as reported by the Acting General Manager.

 

 

4.       Indications of Pecuniary and Conflicts of Interest

Ref: Part 2, Regulation 8(7) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015.

 

Members of the committee are requested to indicate where they may have any pecuniary or conflict of interest in respect to any matter appearing on the agenda, or any supplementary item to the agenda, which the committee has resolved to deal with.

 

5.       Transfer of Agenda Items

Regulation 15 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015.

 

A committee may close a part of a meeting to the public where a matter to be discussed falls within 15(2) of the above regulations.

 

In the event that the committee transfer an item to the closed portion, the reasons for doing so should be stated.

 

Are there any items which should be transferred from this agenda to the closed portion of the agenda, or from the closed to the open portion of the agenda?

 

6.       Planning Authority Items - Consideration of Items With Deputations

 

In accordance with the requirements of Part 2 Regulation 8(3) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015, the General Manager is to arrange the agenda so that the planning authority items are sequential.

 

In accordance with Part 2 Regulation 8(4) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015, the Committee by simple majority may change the order of any of the items listed on the agenda, but in the case of planning items they must still be considered sequentially – in other words they still have to be dealt with as a single group on the agenda.

 

Where deputations are to be received in respect to planning items, past practice has been to move consideration of these items to the beginning of the meeting.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That in accordance with Regulation 8(4) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015, the Committee resolve to deal with any items which have deputations by members of the public regarding any planning matter listed on the agenda, to be taken out of sequence in order to deal with deputations at the beginning of the meeting.

 


 

Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 6

 

3/5/2021

 

 

7.       Committee Acting as Planning Authority

 

In accordance with the provisions of Part 2 Regulation 25 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015, the intention of the Committee to act as a planning authority pursuant to the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993 is to be noted.

 

In accordance with Regulation 25, the Committee will act as a planning authority in respect to those matters appearing under this heading on the agenda, inclusive of any supplementary items.

 

The Committee is reminded that in order to comply with Regulation 25(2), the General Manager is to ensure that the reasons for a decision by a Council or Council Committee acting as a planning authority are recorded in the minutes.

 


Item No. 7.1.1

Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 10

 

3/5/2021

 

 

7.1     Applications under the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015

 

7.1.1   76 Liverpool Street, Hobart - Partial Demolition, Alterations and Signage

            PLN-21-139 - FILE REF: F21/35784

Address:                         76 Liverpool Street, Hobart

Proposal:                       Partial Demolition, Alterations and Signage

Expiry Date:                   31 May 2021

Extension of Time:       Not applicable

Author:                           Deanne Lang

 

 

REcommendation

That pursuant to the Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015, the Council approve the application for partial demolition, alterations and signage at 76 Liverpool Street Hobart for the reasons outlined in the officer's report and a permit containing the following conditions be issued:

 

GEN

The use and/or development must be substantially in accordance with the documents and drawings that comprise PLN-21-139 76 LIVERPOOL STREET HOBART TAS 7000 - Final Planning Application except where modified below.

Reason for condition

To clarify the scope of the permit.

 

THC

The use and/or development must comply with the requirements of the Tasmanian Heritage Council as detailed in the Notice of Heritage Decision, THC Works Ref: 6506 dated 14 April 2021, as attached to the permit.

Reason for condition

To clarify the scope of the permit.

 

ENG 1

Any damage to council infrastructure resulting from the implementation of this permit, must, at the discretion of the Council:

1.      Be met by the owner by way of reimbursement (cost of repair and reinstatement to be paid by the owner to the Council); or

2.      Be repaired and reinstated by the owner to the satisfaction of the Council.

 

A photographic record of the Council's infrastructure adjacent to the subject site must be provided to the Council prior to any commencement of works.

A photographic record of the Council's infrastructure (e.g. existing property service connection points, roads, buildings, stormwater, footpaths, driveway crossovers and nature strips, including if any, pre-existing damage) will  be relied upon to establish the extent of damage caused to the Council's infrastructure during construction. In the event that the owner/developer fails to provide to the Council a photographic record of the Council's infrastructure, then any damage to the Council's infrastructure found on completion of works will be deemed to be the responsibility of the owner.

Reason for condition

To ensure that any of the Council's infrastructure and/or site-related service connections affected by the proposal will be altered and/or reinstated at the owner's full cost.

 

ADVICE

The following advice is provided to you to assist in the implementation of the planning permit that has been issued subject to the conditions above. The advice is not exhaustive and you must inform yourself of any other legislation, by-laws, regulations, codes or standards that will apply to your development under which you may need to obtain an approval. Visit the Council's website for further information.

Prior to any commencement of work on the site or commencement of use the following additional permits/approval may be required from the Hobart City Council.

 

BUILDING PERMIT

You may need building approval in accordance with the Building Act 2016.  Click here for more information.

This is a Discretionary Planning Permit issued in accordance with section 57 of the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993.

 

PLUMBING PERMIT

You may need plumbing approval in accordance with the Building Act 2016, Building Regulations 2016 and the National Construction Code. Click here for more information.

 

OCCUPATION OF THE PUBLIC HIGHWAY

You may require a permit for the occupation of the public highway for construction or special event (e.g. placement of skip bin, crane, scissor lift etc).  Click here for more information.

You may require an occupational license for structures in the Hobart City Council highway reservation, in accordance with conditions to be established by the Council. Click here for more information.

You may require a road closure permit for construction or special event.  Click here for more information.

You may require a Permit to Open Up and Temporarily Occupy a Highway (for work in the road reserve). Click here for more information.

PERMIT FOR VEHICLE ACCESS TO ELIZABETH STREET MALL

 

You may require a permit for vehicle access to the Elizabeth Street mall.  Please contact the Hobart City Council's Customer Services and Parking operations.

.

 

Attachment a:             PLN-21-139 - 76 LIVERPOOL STREET HOBART TAS 7000 - Planning Committee or Delegated Report

Attachment b:             PLN-21-139 - 76 LIVERPOOL STREET HOBART TAS 7000 -CPC Agenda Documents

Attachment c:            PLN-21-139 - 76 LIVERPOOL STREET HOBART TAS 7000 - Planning Referral Officer Cultural Heritage Report   


Item No. 7.1.1

Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 3/5/2021

Page 21

ATTACHMENT a

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


Item No. 7.1.1

Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 3/5/2021

Page 49

ATTACHMENT b

 












































































































































































Item No. 7.1.1

Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 3/5/2021

Page 208

ATTACHMENT c

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

 


Item No. 8.1

Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 209

 

3/5/2021

 

 

8.       Reports

 

8.1    Proposal to amend the Southern Tasmania Regional Land Use Strategy by Extending the Urban Growth Boundary at 69 Brighton Road, Brighton

          File Ref: F21/27879

Report of the Development Planner of 28 April 2021 and attachments.

Delegation:     Council


Item No. 8.1

Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 218

 

3/5/2021

 

 

REPORT TITLE:                  Proposal to amend the Southern Tasmania Regional Land Use Strategy by Extending the Urban Growth Boundary at 69 Brighton Road, Brighton

REPORT PROVIDED BY:  Development Planner

 

1.         Report Purpose and Community Benefit

1.1.     The purpose of this report is to consider a request from Brighton Council to support an extension of the Urban Growth Boundary under the Southern Regional Land Use Strategy 2010-2035 to include 11.27ha of land at 69 Brighton Road, Brighton.

1.1.1.     The report benefits the community by considering whether land within the Southern Region is appropriately zoned.

2.         Report Summary

2.1.     Brighton Council has submitted a letter (Attachment A) to all southern region councils, requesting endorsement for an amendment to the Southern Regional Land Use Strategy 2010-2035 (STRLUS) to extend the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to include 11.27ha of land at 69 Brighton Road, Brighton.

2.2.     The Minister for Planning assesses amendments to the STRLUS, however the responses of all southern region councils are required prior to this assessment.

2.3.     It is proposed that the UGB be extended to account for a 10ha parcel of land that was compulsorily acquired by the Department of Education (DoE) to build the new Brighton High School.

2.4.     The land acquired by DoE was previously earmarked by Brighton Council as future residential development land that would be required to meet residential growth forecasts.

2.5.     Brighton Council has presented arguments that the UGB should be extended, however there are some additional issues that have not been expressly considered.  The critical one is that educational and other community facilities are allowable and expected, uses in residential areas to service the residential population.  Also expanded growth on the urban fringe places greater pressure on existing road networks and require expanded social services.

2.6.     It is recommended that Council on balance and at this time does not support the proposal to amend the STRLUS by extending the UGB to include 11.27ha of land at 69 Brighton Road progressing to assessment by the Minister for Planning.  Rather such an amendment should be considered as part of a wider review of the STRLUS planned in the in the next two years.  Notwithstanding this position should the Minister agree to consider the amendment then some additional considerations should be taken into account in his deliberation.

3.         Recommendation

That:

1.      The Council not support at this time the proposal for an amendment to the Southern Tasmania Regional Land Use Strategy 2010-2035 (STRLUS) to extend the Urban Growth Boundary to include 11.27ha of land at 69 Brighton Road progressing to assessment by the Minister for Planning.  Rather the Council support the consideration of this proposal as part of a wider review of the STRLUS.

2.      Should the Minister agree to determine the proposal at this time then following considerations be taken into account:

a.   Potential impacts of the proposal in light of the MetroPlan project;

b.   The wider potential impact of the proposal on traffic into other Municipal Areas, particularly the Hobart CBD;

c.   The potential cumulative impacts of extensions to the Urban Growth Boundary in regional centres and the need for new social and physical infrastructure to accommodate that growth.

 


 

4.         Background

4.1.     Brighton Council submitted a letter (Attachment A) to all southern region councils, requesting support for an extension of the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to include 11.27ha of land at 69 Brighton Road, Brighton.

4.2.     Brighton Council has submitted a request for the UGB extension to the Minister for Planning, and the Minister requires endorsement from all southern councils before proceeding to consideration of the request.

4.3.     The land at 69 Brighton Road is currently zoned Rural Resource and is directly adjacent to the Urban Growth Boundary.  The entire site is 24.59ha, although the area proposed to be included within the UGB is approximately 11.27ha of the northern end of the site.

4.4.     No planning scheme amendment, subdivision or development application has been proposed for the site at this point.

4.5.     Given 69 Brighton Road is adjacent to the 1000m attenuation buffer for the Bridgewater Quarry, Brighton Council sought feedback from Mineral Resources Tasmania, who had no concerns with the proposal.

4.6.     Brighton Council also sought feedback from the Department of State Growth, who requested the following issues be considered if the proposal is progressed:

4.6.1.     While the property is adjacent to an existing bus route, the centre of the site is further than the standard 400m walkable distance from this route and therefore new bus stops should be considered;

4.6.2.     Currently there are no footpaths along Brighton Road connecting the site to public transport or the town centre, and therefore pedestrian linkages should be explored;

4.6.3.     While neither site is immediately adjacent to the State Road network, the level of development generated is enough to warrant a Traffic Impact Assessment.

5.         Proposal and Implementation

5.1.     The proposal is to consider a request from Brighton Council to support an extension of the Urban Growth Boundary under the Southern Regional Land Use Strategy 2010-2035 to include 11.27ha of land at 69 Brighton Road, Brighton.

Justification – Applicant’s Report

5.2.     Brighton Council supported a report on the merits of the UGB extension at their meeting of 19 January 2021 (Attachment B).

5.3.     Brighton Council considers that the proposed extension to the Urban Growth Boundary is justified for the following reasons:

5.3.1.     The Department of Education (DoE) has compulsorily acquired 10ha of General Residential zoned land at 33 Elderslie Road for the development of a new Brighton High School. 

5.3.2.     This land (which is within the ‘Brighton South’ area) has been identified as a Greenfield Development Precinct in the STRLUS and the Brighton Local Area Plan 2012.

5.3.3.     State Treasury has forecast that the Brighton municipality is predicted to be the fastest growing municipality in Tasmania to 2032.

5.3.4.     The Brighton Structure Plan 2018 (which acts as a guide for Brighton’s major land use, built form and public space changes) suggests that there is inadequate land within the UGB to accommodate Brighton’s long term housing needs.

5.3.5.     A land supply analysis predicts that all remaining infill opportunities would need to be realised in order to accommodate the projected growth, which is unrealistic.

5.3.6.     The loss of 10ha of general residential land due to the new school puts significant pressure on land supply in the Brighton township.

5.3.7.     The extension of the UGB over 11.27ha of land is urgently needed and a logical extension of the township, and will effectively replace the 10ha of land acquired by DoE.

5.3.8.     Brighton Council advocated for the location for the high school to be the existing Jordan River Learning Federation school farm site as it was already owned by DoE and all other considered sites were needed to accommodate residential or recreation growth for the municipality.

5.3.9.     Under LUPAA, it is intended that the Minister undertake regular and periodic reviews of regional strategies, however to date no broad review has taken place and nor has the process for a review begun.

5.3.10.  The STRLUS is in urgent need of review to account for the rapid growth and land supply pressures that have occurred in Brighton over the 10 years since the STRLUS was first gazetted.

5.3.11.  In partnership with the Department of Education, Brighton Council have engaged a consultant to prepare a Master Plan over the South Brighton Area (including 69 Brighton Road) to ensure a thorough planning process and that the new school development is appropriately integrated into the surrounding area.

5.3.12.  69 Brighton Road has frontage to Brighton Road which is an existing public transport corridor, and will be accessible to the Brighton township activity centre to the north and Brighton Industrial Estate to the south.

5.3.13.  There are not likely to be significant land use conflicts given existing surrounding land uses and potential for buffers to grazing land.

5.3.14.  69 Brighton Road has been assessed to be largely unsuitable for agricultural potential, and is not considered to be significant agricultural land.

Justification - Comment

5.4.     Brighton Council has presented arguments for the extension of the UGB to account for the displacement of land that was earmarked for residential development.

5.4.1.     Brighton Council has accounted for the land that was compulsorily acquired by the DoE in its analysis of residential growth (including under the Brighton Local Area Plan 2012 and the Brighton Structure Plan 2018).  The proposed UGB extension will not significantly alter these projections that have formed the basis of Brighton Council’s strategic planning.

5.4.2.     Inclusion of the new high school site as an addition to the growth strategies for Brighton is unlikely to have a wider impact regionally, as it will cater for a local catchment. 

5.4.3.     It is intended that the school site will include other social services, which will be considered as part of a master plan for the site.  This will likely improve access to services for potential future occupants of 69 Brighton Road.

5.4.4.     The STRLUS has not been significantly amended in 10 years, and has not been reviewed based on the Treasury projections released in 2019.

5.4.5.     The original UGB was not intended to operate as a ‘hard’ boundary, and therefore the analysis undertaken to determine the UGB during development of the STRLUS was at a relatively high level, and not exhaustive.

5.4.6.     It is noted that Brighton has already achieved approximately 80% of its infill development target as identified under the STRLUS.  As it is only 10 years into a 25 year planning period, this indicates it is likely the infill target will be achieved well before the end of the STRLUS planning period.

5.5.     A counterview to the argument that the proposal seeks to replace ‘displaced’ residential land, however, is that educational and other community facilities are allowable and expected, uses in residential areas to service the residential population. 

5.6.     Not all residentially zoned land can be expected to be developed as housing, and therefore there is the question of whether the land acquired by the DoE is in fact ‘displacing’ residentially zoned land.  

5.7.     Approximately 120-170 dwellings are intended to be accommodated on the 11.27ha area of 69 Brighton Road if it were to be rezoned to General Residential.

5.8.     It is noted that ultimately the proposed land area and likely housing yield is, in the context of the entire region, a relatively small proportion that is unlikely to have a significant impact of the overall attainment of STRLUS objectives.

5.9.     However continual cumulative amendments of this size, however, is likely to impact on the STRLUS objectives. 

5.10.   The Department of Justice has issued an information sheet (RLUS 1) which details the process to amend land use strategies.  RLUS 1 identifies supporting information required to justify the proposal.

5.11.   Required information for amendments to the UGB includes justification for additional land supported by population growth projections, dwelling yields for additional land, analysis of land consumption since the STRLUS was declared, the suitability of the location, land release sequencing, consideration of STRLUS infill targets and potential for land use conflicts.

5.12.   For amendments to the STRLUS that propose development of ‘greenfield’ land, additional information must be considered around the constraints and values of the land such as natural values, cultural values, hazards, potential loss of agricultural land, land use conflicts, potential for impacts on State and local road networks and whether the other strategic directions and policies in the land use strategy are satisfied.

5.13.   Clearly RLUS 1 foresees the possibility that extensions to the UGB to include greenfield areas population can be justified. However there is a cost for that extension particularly on the urban fringe with the need to expand physical and social services and the impact on vehicle congestion.  While Brighton Council has made a case for the change it is these costs that have not been fully accounted for. 

5.14.   It is therefore considered on balance the proposal should not be supported, at this time, to proceed to consideration by the Minister for Planning.  Rather any such consideration should be considered in light of a wider review of the STRLUS programed by the Department of Justice to occur in the next two years. 

5.15.   Should the Minister agree to consider the amendment then the following considerations should be taken into account:

5.15.1.  Potential impacts of the proposal in light of the MetroPlan project;

5.15.2.  The wider potential impact of the proposal on traffic into other Municipal Areas, particularly the Hobart CBD;

5.15.3.  The potential cumulative impacts of extensions to the UGB in regional centres and the need for new social services and physical infrastructure to accommodate this growth.

6.         Strategic Planning and Policy Considerations

6.1.     As this issue relates to land in another municipal area, Council’s strategic goals, policies and documents are not directly applicable.

7.         Financial Implications

7.1.     Funding Source and Impact on Current Year Operating Result

7.1.1.     None.

7.2.     Impact on Future Years’ Financial Result

7.2.1.     None.

7.3.     Asset Related Implications

7.3.1.     None.

8.         Legal, Risk and Legislative Considerations

8.1.     Proposals for amendments to the STRLUS are guided by an information sheet – RLUS 1.

8.2.     RLUS 1 requires that amendments to the STRLUS must demonstrate that they:

8.2.1.     Further the Schedule 1 Objectives of LUPAA;

8.2.2.     Are in accordance with State Policies made under section 11 of the State Policies and Projects Act;

8.2.3.     Are consistent with the Tasmanian Planning Policies, once they are made; and

8.2.4.     Meet the overarching strategic directions and related policies in the regional land use strategy.

8.3.     Brighton Council has considered each of these requirements, and considers the proposal is capable of meeting them (Attachment B)

8.4.     Amendments to the STRLUS require review and approval by the Minister for Planning, and therefore it will be the Minister that determines whether the requirements of RLUS 1 are satisfied.

8.5.     Any future amendment to rezone this portion of land for residential development will be required to follow the amendment process under LUPAA, including public consultation.

9.         Environmental Considerations

9.1.     The environmental values of the site have been considered by Brighton Council.  An area of critically endangered grassland has been identified on a portion of the site, which is intended to be taken into account with any master planning for the site.

9.2.     Continued expansion of residential development on greenfield land in regional centres can be of potential concern environmentally, particularly where residents are primarily dependent on private vehicles for transport and the need for duplication of social services and other physical infrastructure. 

9.3.     It is noted, however, that preventing the release of any greenfield land around existing rural centres does not fully translate as infill development.  Due to cost of construction and lifestyle preferences, it can instead displace some dwellings to rural areas that are further from town centres and public transport, thereby even further increasing population dispersal.  However this should not represent an argument for continual expansion of the urban fringe with all of the associated service and social costs that are well documented.

10.      Marketing and Media

10.1.   There are no marketing or branding implications of this proposal.

11.      Community and Stakeholder Engagement

11.1.   No community or stakeholder engagement is required by the City of Hobart.

12.      Delegation

12.1.   Delegation rests with the Council.

 

As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.

 

Sarah Crawford Signature

Sarah Crawford

Development Planner

 

 

Date:                            28 April 2021

File Reference:          F21/27879

 

 

Attachment a:             Letter from Brighton Council

Attachment b:             Brighton Council Report   


Item No. 8.1

Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 3/5/2021

Page 219

ATTACHMENT a

 

PDF Creator


Item No. 8.1

Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 3/5/2021

Page 262

ATTACHMENT b

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator




PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


Item No. 8.2

Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 274

 

3/5/2021

 

 

8.2    Delegated Decision Report (Planning)

          File Ref: F21/35416

Memorandum of the Director City Planning of 26 April 2021 and attachments.

Delegation:     Committee


Item No. 8.2

Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 275

 

3/5/2021

 

 

 

 

Memorandum: City Planning Committee

 

Delegated Decision Report (Planning)

 

Attached is the delegated planning decisions report for the period 12 April 2021 to 23 April 2021.

 

REcommendation

That:

1.      That the information be received and noted.

 

As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.

 

Neil Noye

Director City Planning

 

 

Date:                            26 April 2021

File Reference:          F21/35416

 

 

Attachment a:             Delegated Decision Report (Planning)   


Item No. 8.2

Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 3/5/2021

Page 277

ATTACHMENT a

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


Item No. 8.3

Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 278

 

3/5/2021

 

 

8.3    City Planning - Advertising Report

          File Ref: F21/36035

Memorandum of the Director City Planning of 27 April 2021 and attachments.

Delegation:     Committee


Item No. 8.3

Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 279

 

3/5/2021

 

 

 

 

Memorandum: City Planning Committee

 

City Planning - Advertising Report

 

Attached is the advertising list for the period 12 April 2021 to 23 April 2021.

 

REcommendation

That:

1.      That the information be received and noted.

 

As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.

 

Neil Noye

Director City Planning

 

 

Date:                            27 April 2021

File Reference:          F21/36035

 

 

Attachment a:             City Planning - Advertising Report   


Item No. 8.3

Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting - 3/5/2021

Page 282

ATTACHMENT a

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

 


 

Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 283

 

3/5/2021

 

 

9.       Questions Without Notice

Section 29 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015.

File Ref: 13-1-10

 

An Elected Member may ask a question without notice of the Chairman, another Elected Member, the General Manager or the General Manager’s representative, in line with the following procedures:

1.         The Chairman will refuse to accept a question without notice if it does not relate to the Terms of Reference of the Council committee at which it is asked.

2.         In putting a question without notice, an Elected Member must not:

(i)    offer an argument or opinion; or

(ii)   draw any inferences or make any imputations – except so far as may be necessary to explain the question.

3.         The Chairman must not permit any debate of a question without notice or its answer.

4.         The Chairman, Elected Members, General Manager or General Manager’s representative who is asked a question may decline to answer the question, if in the opinion of the respondent it is considered inappropriate due to its being unclear, insulting or improper.

5.         The Chairman may require a question to be put in writing.

6.         Where a question without notice is asked and answered at a meeting, both the question and the response will be recorded in the minutes of that meeting.

7.         Where a response is not able to be provided at the meeting, the question will be taken on notice and

(i)    the minutes of the meeting at which the question is asked will record the question and the fact that it has been taken on notice.

(ii)   a written response will be provided to all Elected Members, at the appropriate time.

(iii)  upon the answer to the question being circulated to Elected Members, both the question and the answer will be listed on the agenda for the next available ordinary meeting of the committee at which it was asked, where it will be listed for noting purposes only.

 


 

Agenda (Open Portion)

City Planning Committee Meeting

Page 284

 

3/5/2021

 

 

10.     Closed Portion Of The Meeting

 

That the Committee resolve by majority that the meeting be closed to the public pursuant to regulation 15(1) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015 because the items included on the closed agenda contain the following matters:  

 

·         Confirm the miutes of the Closed portion of the meeting

·         Questions without notice in the Closed portion

 

The following items were discussed: -

 

Item No. 1          Minutes of the last meeting of the Closed Portion of the Council Meeting

Item No. 2          Consideration of supplementary items to the agenda

Item No. 3          Indications of pecuniary and conflicts of interest

Item No. 4          Questions Without Notice