HCC Coat of Arms.jpg
City of hobart

 

 

 

 

AGENDA

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

 

Open Portion

 

Thursday, 9 May 2019

 

at 5:15 pm

Lady Osborne Room, Town Hall


 

 

 

 

THE MISSION

Our mission is to ensure good governance of our capital City.

THE VALUES

The Council is:

 

about people

We value people – our community, our customers and colleagues.

professional

We take pride in our work.

enterprising

We look for ways to create value.

responsive

We’re accessible and focused on service.

inclusive

We respect diversity in people and ideas.

making a difference

We recognise that everything we do shapes Hobart’s future.

 

 


 

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 3

 

9/5/2019

 

 

ORDER OF BUSINESS

 

Business listed on the agenda is to be conducted in the order in which it is set out, unless the committee by simple majority determines otherwise.

 

APOLOGIES AND LEAVE OF ABSENCE

1.        Co-Option of a Committee Member in the event of a vacancy  4

2.        Confirmation of Minutes. 4

3.        Consideration of Supplementary Items. 4

4.        Indications of Pecuniary and Conflicts of Interest. 5

5.        Transfer of Agenda Items. 5

6.        Reports. 6

6.1     Review of the Dog Management Strategy 2014-2018. 6

6.2     2019-20 Fees and Charges - Community Life - Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre. 34

6.3     2019-20 Fees and Charges - City Amenity Division - Bushland and Parks and Recreation. 42

6.4     Marieville Esplanade - Derwent Sailing Squadron - Extension of Lease Area  62

6.5     Marieville Esplanade Reserve, Sandy Bay - Request to Install a Memorial Plaque. 68

6.6     Royal Tasmanian Botanical Garden - Annual Grant - 2018/2019. 82

6.7     Swan Street Park, North Hobart - Concept Plan of Proposed Refurbishment - Results of Community Engagement 94

6.8     Non-Chemical Treatment in Weed Control Within Urban Streetscapes - Trial Outcome. 103

7.        Motions of which Notice has been Given. 111

7.1     Trans and Gender-Diverse Posters in Public Convenience Facilities. 111

8.        Committee Action Status Report. 112

8.1     Committee Actions - Status Report 112

9.        Questions Without Notice. 145

10.     Closed Portion Of The Meeting.. 146

 


 

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 4

 

9/5/2019

 

 

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting (Open Portion) held Thursday, 9 May 2019 at 5:15 pm in the Lady Osborne Room, Town Hall.

 

COMMITTEE MEMBERS

Briscoe (Chairman)

Deputy Lord Mayor Burnet

Thomas

Ewin

Sherlock

 

NON-MEMBERS

Lord Mayor Reynolds

Zucco

Sexton

Denison

Harvey

Behrakis

Dutta

Apologies:

 

 

Leave of Absence: Nil.

 

1.       Co-Option of a Committee Member in the event of a vacancy

 

 

 

2.       Confirmation of Minutes

 

The minutes of the Open Portion of the Parks and Recreation Committee meeting held on Thursday, 4 April 2019 and the Special Parks and Recreation Committee meeting held on Monday, 4 March 2019, are submitted for confirming as an accurate record.

 

 

 

 

3.       Consideration of Supplementary Items

Ref: Part 2, Regulation 8(6) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015.

Recommendation

 

That the Committee resolve to deal with any supplementary items not appearing on the agenda, as reported by the General Manager.

 

 

4.       Indications of Pecuniary and Conflicts of Interest

Ref: Part 2, Regulation 8(7) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015.

 

Members of the Committee are requested to indicate where they may have any pecuniary or conflict of interest in respect to any matter appearing on the agenda, or any supplementary item to the agenda, which the Committee has resolved to deal with.

 

 

 

 

5.       Transfer of Agenda Items

Regulation 15 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015.

 

A Committee may close a part of a meeting to the public where a matter to be discussed falls within 15(2) of the above regulations.

 

In the event that the Committee transfer an item to the closed portion, the reasons for doing so should be stated.

 

Are there any items which should be transferred from this agenda to the closed portion of the agenda, or from the closed to the open portion of the agenda?

 


Item No. 6.1

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 6

 

9/5/2019

 

 

6.       Reports

 

6.1    Review of the Dog Management Strategy 2014-2018

          File Ref: F19/50800; 18/108

Report of the Manager Development Compliance of 3 May 2019 and attachments.

Delegation:     Council


Item No. 6.1

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 7

 

9/5/2019

 

 

REPORT TITLE:                  Review of the Dog Management Strategy 2014-2018

REPORT PROVIDED BY:  Manager Development Compliance

 

1.         Report Purpose and Community Benefit

1.1.     The purpose of this report is to present the results of the public submissions undertaken on the Dog Management Policy and proposed declared areas in accordance with the requirements of the Dog Control Act 2000 (the Act). 

2.         Report Summary

2.1.     It is a requirement of the Act that the City have a dog management policy which is reviewed every 5 years.

2.2.     All declared areas under the Act are also required to be reviewed every 5 years. 

2.3.     The draft new policy and proposed declared areas were released for public comment in January 2019.  208 submissions were received from the public.

2.4.     Minor amendments are proposed to a small number of the declared areas to address anomalies or drafting errors. 

2.5.     The policy and remainder of the declared areas are presented for finalisation. 

3.         Recommendation

That:

1.      Pursuant to section 24 of the Dog Control Act 2000, the Council notes the public submissions received during the public consultation period and provided under separate cover. 

2.      Pursuant to section 7 of the Dog Control Act 2000, the Council adopt the policy at Attachment A as the Dog Management Policy for dog management in the City of Hobart for the period 2019-2023.

3.      Pursuant to section 20 of the Dog Control Act 2000 the Council declare the areas in Attachment B.

4.      Council endorse notification of the declared areas pursuant to section 25 of the Dog Control Act 2000 by public notice on 25 May 2019 to take effect on 24 June 2019 and to remain in force until 23 June 2023.

 

5.      The Council endorse the amendments to Radfords Track, Mathers Place, Queens Domain and Hobart Regatta Grounds in Attachment C for release for public comment to be advertised by public notice in accordance with the requirements of the Dog Control Act 2000.

6.      A further report be prepared on Radfords Track, Mathers Place, Queens Domain and Hobart Regatta Grounds for consideration by the Council following the advertisement referred to in paragraph 5.

4.         Background

4.1.     Section 7 of the Act requires a council to develop and implement a policy relating to dog management in its municipal area. 

4.2.     Section 7(4) of the Act requires a council to review its dog management policy once every 5 years.

4.3.     Sections 20-24 of the Act give the City the power to declare areas where dogs may be exercised, where dogs may be trained, where dogs are prohibited and where dogs are restricted from entering.

4.4.     Section 26 of the Act requires any declaration to be reviewed every 5 years.

4.5.     A review of the current policy commenced on 30 April 2018 by inviting feedback from the community

4.6.     172 submissions were received at the close of the public submissions period.

4.7.     The submissions, a draft policy and draft proposed areas were considered by the Council at its meeting in December 2018, where it was resolved to release the draft policy and proposed declared areas for public comment.

4.8.     The public consultation period commenced on 5 January 2019 and 208 submissions were received 

4.9.     A full copy of all submissions is provided under separate cover due to the requirement to comply with the Personal Information Protection Act 2004

4.10.   The submissions mainly focussed on three areas:

4.10.1.  Firth/Girrabong;

4.10.2.  Nutgrove Beach;

4.10.3.  South Hobart Oval and Wellesley Park.

4.11.   The responses were similar in nature to the first round; submissions in favour of dogs made arguments about the importance of community and fair use of spaces, and those against dogs cite hygiene and disruption to humans as their primary concerns

4.12.   In general, more responses received were in favour of allowing dogs in all of the declared areas.

Firth/Girrabong

4.13.   A small handful of submissions did not discuss declared areas, but instead focussed on a perceived lack of enforcement; particularly of dogs being off-lead in areas where this is not allowed, and barking complaints.

4.14.   There were 26 total submissions, with 24 being in favour of keeping dogs in the park, and 2 that suggested dogs should be banned from the park.

4.15.   All of the submissions in favour of allowing it to be an off-lead dog park raised issue with the 10m exclusion zone around the basketball hoop, and most also wished the hours in which dogs are permitted in the park to be extended.

4.16.   Both the submissions against the suggested changes cited issues with noise, hygiene and the difficulty of enforcing the hours and exclusion zone. These residents were unconvinced that the changes would prevent the negative externalities they feel are caused by having dogs allowed in the park.

Nutgrove Beach

4.17.   There were 5 submissions; 3 in favour of the extended hours and allowing dogs on the beach, and 2 against having dogs on the beach.

4.18.   Those responses against the declared areas were concerned about dogs being aggressive and disruptive, as well as people being non-complaint and having their dogs off lead during restricted hours.

South Hobart Oval and Wellesley park

4.19.   There were 32 submissions: 28 in favour of the proposal to continue the shared use of the ovals, and 4 that wanted dogs completely banned from the ovals.

4.20.   Those submissions arguing for a ban cited hygiene issues, the importance of maintaining a high-quality sports ground and preventing dogs from harassing human users of the area. A number of the submissions suggested that dogs should be confined to the current declared off-lead area at the rivulet instead.

4.21.   The supportive submissions described the importance of the South Hobart dog-owning community, the lack of other off-lead spaces and their importance for the wellbeing of dogs, as well as noting that the ovals otherwise stand unused when soccer is not being played. Many of the submissions also challenged the notion that dogs are particularly destructive to the playing surface.

4.22.   The submissions have been considered by officers and in response the officers note the following:

Firth/Girrabong

4.23.   No change is proposed.  As identified in the original report, the restrictions provide a balance between those that wish for the park to be available off-lead for dogs with those who wish for dogs to be prohibited having regard to the close proximity of the space to residential houses.  The time restrictions ensure that the concerns about noise raised in the submissions are limited to times where background and neighbour noise is expected and reasonable.

4.24.   It is not proposed to relax the prohibition of dogs within 10 metres of the basketball hoop.  This prohibition is considered reasonable given the opportunity for conflict between users of the equipment and dogs off-lead. 

4.25.   Enforcement is addressed in the new policy.

Nutgrove

4.26.   No change is proposed.  The concerns raised in the submissions focus more on compliance generally rather than the impact of the proposed additional one hour of off-lead.

South Hobart Oval and Wellesley park

4.27.   No change is proposed.  As noted in the report of December 2018, any prohibition is considered premature without implementing other measures to address the concerns raised in the submissions.

4.28.   The following issues were also identified during the consultation period:

Radfords Track

4.29.   Radfords Track is declared a prohibited area.  This has been the position in the Policy for at least 10 years.  However, the Wellington Park Management Trust nominate Radfords Track as an on-lead exercise area.  It is proper for the City of Hobart Dog Management Policy to adopt the position determined as appropriate by the Trust and therefore it is proposed that Radfords Track be on-lead.

 

Mathers Place

4.30.   Mathers Place is declared a prohibited area however the City supports the Pets in the Park Clinic one Saturday a month which provides animal support services for homeless.  In additional, officers are aware that people living in the inner city (units/apartment) use Mathers Place for their small dogs on leads.  It is therefore proposed that Mathers Place be on-lead.

Queens Domain, Hobart Regatta Grounds

4.31.   The Cenotaph and approaches, the helicopter and medical emergency landing area  is declared a prohibited area while the area surrounding the Cenotaph and approaches  is declared off-lead area. This inconsistency needs to be resolved.  The map below illustrates what is intended.  

4.32.   A wording change is proposed to note the Cenotaph and approaches is prohibited while the Hobart Regatta Groups is off-lead only when not used for community activities.   

4.33.   The final policy and declared areas (excluding Radfords Track, Mathers Place and Queens Domain and Hobart Regatta Grounds are attached (see Attachment A and Attachment B respectively).

4.34.   The proposed declarations for Radfords Track, Mathers Place and Queens Domain and Hobart Regatta Grounds are attached (Attachment C).

5.         Proposal and Implementation

5.1.     It is proposed that

5.1.1.     The Council adopt the policy at Attachment A as the Dog Management Policy for dog management in the City of Hobart for the period 2019-2023.

5.1.2.     Pursuant to section 20 of the Act, the Council declare the areas in Attachment B.

 

5.2.     Pursuant to section 25 of the Act, the Council is to provide notice of:

(a) The date on which a declaration under, being a date at least 20 working days after a notice undersection 24 is published; and

(b) The period during which the declaration remains in force.

5.3.     It is proposed the Council endorse the notification of the declared areas pursuant to section 25 of the Dog Control Act 2000 on 25 May 2019 to take effect on 24 June 2019 and to remain in force until 23 June 2023.

5.4.     It is also proposed:

5.4.1.     The Council endorse the amendments to Radfords Track, Mathers Place and Queens Domain, Hobart Regatta Grounds for release for public comment to be advertised for by public notice in accordance with the requirements of the Dog Control Act 2000.

5.4.2.     Following the advertising period and review of submissions for the three areas above, a further report will be provided to enable finalisation of the declaration of those areas.

6.         Financial Implications

6.1.     The new policy and declared areas will require an update of some signage and dog dispensers.  The cost is expected to be met from the City’s current operational budget. 

7.         Legal, Risk and Legislative Considerations

7.1.     The Act requires the City to develop and implement a policy relating to dog management within the municipal area including the designation of declared areas.  The Act requires the City to review the policy and declared areas at least once every five years.

8.         Social and Customer Considerations

8.1.     The policy, on responsible dog ownership which involves an owner taking personal responsibility for their dog(s) and managing this responsibility in a way that is the best interests of the animal but also carries with it a responsibility to respect the environment and other people.

8.2.     The proposed areas seek to achieve a balance and compatible relationship between dogs, dog owners, neighbours and other users of the City’s public areas.

8.3.     It is expected that all dog owners residing in and visiting the City abide by the dog management policy and the requirements of the Act.

9.         Community and Stakeholder Engagement

9.1.     Public consultation has been undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the Act

10.      Delegation

10.1.   The adoption of the policy and declaration of the area requires formal approval by the Council. 

 

As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.

 

Kirsten Turner

Manager Development Compliance

 

 

Date:                            3 May 2019

File Reference:          F19/50800; 18/108

 

 

Attachment a:             Dog Management Policy

Attachment b:             Declared Areas

Attachment c:            Proposed Modifications to Declared Areas   


Item No. 6.1

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting - 9/5/2019

Page 14

ATTACHMENT a

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Item No. 6.1

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting - 9/5/2019

Page 30

ATTACHMENT b

 

DOG CONTROL ACT 2000

 

PROHIBITED AREAS

All areas that provide sensitive habitat for wildlife other than on-lead on managed tracks and trails or off-lead areas where designated, and

Beaumaris Zoo

Blinking Billy Beach, extending from frontage adjacent to 676A Sandy Bay Road to frontage adjacent to 712 Sandy Bay Road

Cornelian Bay – from the restaurant to the boat sheds including the playground except on formed track

Cartwright Point Reserve, Sandy Bay – area above Sandy Bay Road

New Town Bay Reserve – wetlands

Red Chapel Beach, Sandy Bay

Ten metres (10 m) from any creek or rivulet edge except on formal tracks and trails.

·    All bushland reserves other than on-lead on managed tracks and trails or off-lead areas where designated.

·    Battery area at Alexander Battery

·    Elizabeth Mall, Elizabeth Street (between Collins and Liverpool Streets)

·    Intercity cycleway - Regatta Grounds to municipal boundary

·    Long Beach, Sandy Bay

·    Marieville Esplanade – grassed area between the entrance to the boat sheds and the Royal Hobart Yacht Club

·    Mawson Place – whilst events are being held

·    McRobies Road Gully – ten metre (10 m) exclusion zone around the perimeter of the waste management site

·    North Hobart Skate Park

·    Salamanca Market and Salamanca Square during market hours of 5.30am and 3.00pm

·    Soldiers Memorial Community Hub

·    Sports facilities - North Hobart, New Town, TCA, Queenborough oval and surrounds, New Town Netball Centre, The Hobart Aquatic Centre and surrounds, and the Domain Athletics Centre

·    Waterworks Reserve – due to TasWater operations and sensitive wildlife habitat

·    Wellington Court including the Bank Arcade

·    Any area of Wellington Park with the exception of approved walking tracks, roads and vehicular tracks in the Recreation Zone (defined as the lower eastern foothills of kunanyi/Mount Wellington, below Pinnacle Road from The Springs to the Old Hobartians Track), but not including:

The Silver Falls Track (from the Pipeline Track to Middle Track);

North South Track (Shoobridge bend to Old Hobartians Track);

Lost World Track;

The Springs Zone (unless making a connection to approved tracks and trails); and

The Pinnacle Zone (unless the dog is confined within a vehicle).


Item No. 6.1

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting - 9/5/2019

Page 31

ATTACHMENT b

 

OFF-LEAD EXERCISE AREAS

·    Alexandra Battery, Churchill Avenue, Sandy Bay – Alexandra Battery except the Battery, the lookout and the car park

·    Blinking Billy Point Reserve, Sandy Bay

·    Cartwright Point Reserve, Sandy Bay – area below Sandy Bay Road

·    Churchill Avenue, Sandy Bay – open space adjoining Churchill Avenue

·    Cornelian Bay – the foreshore car park to Cornelian Bay Point

·    John Turnbull Dog Park, Lenah Valley

·    Kalang Avenue Reserve, Lenah Valley

·    MacFarlane Street, South Hobart – public open space over footbridge alongside the Hobart Rivulet (linear park track on-lead).  Entry off Tara or MacFarlane Streets

·    Queens Domain – The Wireless Station (area bounded by the Summit Loop Road) and mowed area to the east of the summit loop road, and the area between the Doone Kenndy Hobart Aquatic Centre and the Domain Tennis Centre.

·    Rangeview Crescent Reserve, Lenah Valley

·    Ridgeway – old recreation oval (track to oval on-lead)

·    Ross Patent Slip, Battery Point – grassed area off Napoleon Street

·    Short Beach and Errol Flynn Reserve, Marieville Esplanade, Sandy Bay

·    Skyline Reserve – area off 27 Brinsmead Road, Mt Nelson

·    Sports fields when sport is not being played or activities undertaken

·    Surrounds of sports fields except where prohibited

·    Wellesley Park, South Hobart – area below the sports field

 

ON-LEAD EXERCISE AREAS

·    All road pathways and road related areas within the municipal area

·    Dogs can only be exercised on-lead on managed tracks and trails, and grassed areas in all Council parks, reserves and bushland areas where indicated.

·    Ancanthe Gardens, Lenah Valley

·    Bridge of Remembrance

·    Franklin Square

·    New Town Bay Reserve

·    John Turnbull Park and John Turnbull Oval

·    Salamanca Lawns

·    St Davids Park

·    Wellington Park – unless otherwise sign posted or notified, exercise of dogs on-lead is permitted on approved walking tracks, roads and vehicular tracks in the Recreation Zone (defined as the lower eastern foothills of kunanyi/Mount Wellington, below Pinnacle Road from the Springs to the Old Hobartians Track), but not including:

The Silver Falls Track (from the Pipeline Track to Middle Track);

North-South Track (Shoobridge bend to Old Hobartians Track);

Lost World Track;

The Springs Zone (if making a connection to other approved tracks and trails); and

The Pinnacle Zone (if the dog is confined within a vehicle)

·    The Pipeline Track (between Fern Tree and the municipal boundary) Note: the Pipeline Track extends into the Kingborough municipality

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RESTRICTED AREAS

Parks

Dogs are permitted off-lead from 7.00pm to 9.00am during daylight savings time and between 3.00pm and 9.00am at all other times.

Dogs are permitted on-lead between 9.00am and 7.00pm during daylight savings time and between 9.00am and 3.00pm at all other times.

 

·    Princes Park

·    Cascade Gardens

·    Fitzroy Gardens

·    Soundy Park

·    Benjafield Terrace

 

Girrabong Play Area

Dogs are permitted off-lead between 9.00am to 7:00pm except within any area within 10 metres of the basketball area which is prohibited.

 

Dogs are prohibited between 7:00pm to 9:00am

Beaches

Dogs are permitted off-lead between 7.00pm and 10.00am during daylight savings time and between 3.00pm and 10.00am at all other times.

Dogs are permitted on-lead between 10.00am and 7.00pm during daylight savings time and between 10.00am and 3.00pm at all other times.

 

·    Nutgrove Beach

 

Bushland

Knocklofty Reserve – Tracks and trails in the area between Forest Road car park, Poets Road, Fielding Drive reservoir and the walking track to the west.

 

Dogs are permitted on-lead between 8.00pm and 6.00am during daylight savings time and between 5.00pm and 7.00am at all other times.

Dogs are permitted off-lead between 6.00am and 8.00pm during daylight savings time and between 7.00am and 5.00pm at all other times.

 

All other areas of Knocklofty Reserve are on-lead at all times.

TRAINING AREAS

·    Soldiers Memorial Oval (formally, the Domain Cross Roads Oval) is declared as an off-lead dog

training area during dog training hours


Item No. 6.1

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting - 9/5/2019

Page 33

ATTACHMENT c

 

PROPOSED AMENDED DECLARED AREAS

 

PROHIBITED

Regatta Grounds when being used for a community activity

Cenotaph and Surrounds

 

OFF-LEAD EXERCISE AREAS

Regatta Grounds except when used for a community activity

 

ON-LEAD EXERCISE AREA

Radfords Track

Mathers Place

 

 


Item No. 6.2

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 34

 

9/5/2019

 

 

6.2    2019-20 Fees and Charges - Community Life - Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre

          File Ref: F19/32225

Report of the Director Community Life of 3 May 2019 and attachment.

Delegation:     Council


Item No. 6.2

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 35

 

9/5/2019

 

 

REPORT TITLE:                  2019-20 Fees and Charges - Community Life - Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre

REPORT PROVIDED BY:  Director Community Life

 

1.         Report Purpose and Community Benefit

1.1.     The purpose of this report is to seek endorsement of the proposed fees and charges applicable to the Community Life Division’s Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre (DKHAC) for the 2019-20 financial year.

2.         Report Summary

2.1.     Pursuant to section 205 of the Local Government Act 1993, the Council may impose fees and charges for various services.

2.2.     The attached schedules detail the proposed fees and charges for the Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre (refer Attachment A).

 

3.         Recommendation

That the schedules of fees and charges for the Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre (DKHAC) for the 2019-20 financial year, marked as Attachment A to the report, be approved.

 

4.         Background

4.1.     The fees and charges for the Community Life Division’s Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre (DKHAC) for the 2019-20 financial year have been assessed.

5.         Proposal and Implementation

5.1.     A comprehensive market analysis has been completed to ensure the DKHAC maintains a position of competitive neutrality.

5.1.1.     Some decreases apply to some hire rates as a result.

5.2.     Improvements to the physical fabric and core plant to operate the Centre continues to be implemented.

5.3.     The revenue from the proposed fees and charges applicable to the DKHAC for the 2019-20 financial year is anticipated to decrease by $110,000 or 2 per cent from the 2018-19 revised budget.

5.3.1.     This reduction is anticipated due to the impacts of the redevelopment program at the Centre and reduced access to some facilities.

5.4.     It is proposed that the attached schedules of fees and charges for the 2019-20 be endorsed by the Council.

6.         Strategic Planning and Policy Considerations

6.1.     The annual review of the City’s fees and charges contributes to the Capital City Strategic Plan 2015-2025 - Goal 5 – “Governance, Leadership provides for informed decision-making for our capital city”. 

7.         Financial Implications

7.1.     Funding Source and Impact on Current Year Operating Result

7.1.1.     Not applicable.

7.2.     Impact on Future Years’ Financial Result

The review of the fees and charges for the Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre has been undertaken and expected decrease for the 2019–20 financial year is as follows:


Function Area

2018-19
BUDGET

2019-20
BUDGET

Increase / (Decrease)

DKHAC

$5.1M

$5M

($110,000)

(2)%

8.         Legal, Risk and Legislative Considerations

8.1.     Pursuant to section 205 of the Local Government Act 1993, the Council may impose fees and charges for various services.

9.         Delegation

9.1.     This matter is delegated to the Council

 

As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.

 

Tim Short

Director Community Life

 

 

Date:                            3 May 2019

File Reference:          F19/32225

 

 

Attachment a:             2019-20 Proposed Fees and Charges for the Doone Kennedy Hobart Aquatic Centre   


Item No. 6.2

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting - 9/5/2019

Page 37

ATTACHMENT a

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Item No. 6.3

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 43

 

9/5/2019

 

 

6.3    2019-20 Fees and Charges - City Amenity Division - Bushland and Parks and Recreation

          File Ref: F19/43597

Report of the Director City Amenity of 3 May 2019 and attachment.

Delegation:     Council


Item No. 6.3

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 44

 

9/5/2019

 

 

REPORT TITLE:                  2019-20 Fees and Charges - City Amenity Division - Bushland and Parks and Recreation

REPORT PROVIDED BY:  Director City Amenity

 

1.         Report Purpose and Community Benefit

1.1.     The purpose of this report is to seek approval of the proposed fees and charges applicable to the City’s parks, sports grounds and bushland areas for the 2019-20 financial year

2.         Report Summary

2.1.     Pursuant to section 205 of the Local Government Act 1993, the Council may impose fees and charges for various services.

2.2.     The attached schedules detail the proposed fees and charges for the Bushland and Parks and Recreation programs for the 2019-20 financial year.

 

3.         Recommendation

That the schedule of fees and charges be approved in respect to the use of the City’s parks, sports grounds and bushland areas for the 2019-20 financial year, as marked as Attachment A this report.

 

4.         Background

4.1.     The fees and charges for the City Amenity’s Bushland, and Parks and Recreation Units for the 2019-20 financial year have been assessed.

5.         Proposal and Implementation

5.1.     It is proposed that the attached schedules of fees and charges for the 2019-20 financial year be approved.


Bushland

5.2.     Minor increases to most fees are in line or below CPI.

5.3.     A small number of new charges are proposed, as indicated below:

5.3.1.     Waterworks Reserve

A change to the structure of fees for the hire of Waterworks Reserve bbq sites to move to an hourly rate.

5.3.2.     Fire Hazard Abatement

A new administration fee for those wanting a fire break on City land for private development to help offset the administrative costs involved in this process.

5.3.3.     Dorney House

A new fee for architectural tours of Dorney House for groups wishing to tour the site as part of architectural education.

5.4.     Overall, revenue is anticipated to decrease by $4,000 or -8% due to lower than previously budgeted income from the Bush Adventures Program and a more conservative outlook for income from Dorney House.

Parks and Reserves

5.5.     Minor increases to most fees are in line or below CPI to offset the increasing costs of maintaining the City’s parks.

5.6.     The removal of fees specific to Wedding Ceremonies to fall in line with community expectation that a wedding booking is no different to other uses.

5.7.     Overall, revenue is anticipated to increase by $5,000 or 4.34% due to these changes.

Sporting Facilities/Sports grounds

5.8.     Minor increases to most fees are in line or below CPI to offset the increasing costs of ground preparation whilst maintaining community affordability.

5.9.     The utilisation of the City’s sporting grounds remains close to capacity. The City continues to invest heavily in these community assets, including improved lighting, drainage, irrigation and surfacing works, with close consultation with key user groups to ensure grounds remain suitably maintained during arduous sporting sessions. Every opportunity is made to cater to both long standing clubs and creating opportunities for new or casual hirers.

 

5.10.   A small number of new charges are proposed; as indicated below:

5.10.1.  All Grounds

A 100% penalty surcharge of the applicable fee for unauthorised use of a ground to deter groups from using a ground without a booking which often causes additional damage to an oval which then negatively impacts on future booked users.

5.10.2.  All Grounds

A penalty fee for use of a cordoned off section of ground to deter users from removing bunting, rope or barriers used to section off areas of a ground that need to be rested in order to ensure the longevity of the ground throughout a season.

5.11.   Overall, revenue is anticipated to increase by $8,144 or 2%.

Mornington Skills Centre

5.12.   No fee increase is proposed to ensure the facility remains attractive to the market.

5.13.   Revenue is anticipated to increase by $2,000 or 20% due to the fees remaining competitive.

6.         Strategic Planning and Policy Considerations

6.1.     The annual review of the City’s fees and charges contributes to the Capital City Strategic Plan 2015-2025 - Goal 5 – “Governance, Leadership provides for informed decision-making for our capital city”. 

7.         Financial Implications

7.1.     Funding Source and Impact on Current Year Operating Result

7.1.1.     Not applicable.

7.2.     Impact on Future Years’ Financial Result

7.2.1.     The review of the fees and charges for the Division’s Bushland, and Parks and Recreation Units has been undertaken and expected increases/decreases for the 2019-20 financial year for each function area is expected as follows:


Function Area

2017-18
BUDGET

2018-19
BUDGET

Increase / (Decrease)

Bushland

$50,000

$46,000

($4,000)

-8%

Parks & Reserves

$115,100

$120,100

$5,000

4.34%

Sporting Facilities

$407,200

$415,344

$8,144

2%

Mornington Skills Centre

$10,000

$12,000

$2,000

20%

8.         Legal, Risk and Legislative Considerations

8.1.     Pursuant to section 205 of the Local Government Act 1993, Council may impose fees and charges for various services.

9.         Delegation

9.1.     This matter is delegated to the Council

 

As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.

 

Glenn Doyle

Glenn Doyle

Director City Amenity

 

 

Date:                            3 May 2019

File Reference:          F19/43597

 

 

Attachment a:             Proposed Fees and Charges 2019-2020 - Bushland and Parks and Recreation   


Item No. 6.3

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting - 9/5/2019

Page 48

ATTACHMENT a

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Item No. 6.4

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 64

 

9/5/2019

 

 

6.4    Marieville Esplanade - Derwent Sailing Squadron - Extension of Lease Area

          File Ref: F19/1576; R0669

Report of the Program Leader Recreation and Projects, the Manager Parks and Recreation and the Director City Amenity of 3 May 2019.

Delegation:     Council


Item No. 6.4

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 65

 

9/5/2019

 

 

REPORT TITLE:                  Marieville Esplanade - Derwent Sailing Squadron - Extension of Lease Area

REPORT PROVIDED BY:  Program Leader Recreation and Projects

Manager Parks and Recreation

Director City Amenity

 

1.         Report Purpose and Community Benefit

1.1.     The purpose of this report is to consider a request from the Derwent Sailing Squadron to extend their current lease footprint to include an adjoining City owned section of land and formalise the use of the adjoining land as additional car parking spaces for the Club.

2.         Report Summary

2.1.     The Derwent Sailing Squadron (DSS) has requested an extended lease area that adjoins with their current lease area.

2.2.     The adjoining area they wish to acquire as part of their lease is currently public land, zoned recreation and utilised as a public car park to serve the local area.

2.3.     Under the proposal the proponent would be charged a commercial rental at the valuation price for the space of land and maintain full responsibility for its management.

2.4.     It is recommended that the DSS’ request for a lease over this land be refused, as the area is deemed public land and is currently well utilised by the community (though site improvement works are required).

3.         Recommendation

That:

1.      The Derwent Sailing Squadron’s request to lease an adjoining portion of public land located in Marieville Esplanade, Sandy Bay, be declined.

2.      The City undertake surface improvement and car park line marking works on the site.

3.      Longer term options for the land be considered as part of a masterplan development for the Marieville Esplanade location planned to be undertaken during the 2019-20 financial year.

 


 

4.         Background

4.1.     The property is located at the southern end of Marieville Esplanade near Sandy Bay Road intersection. It adjoins the south-western boundary of the existing Derwent Sailing Squadron (DSS) landside lease area.  A site plan is shown below:

 

 

4.2.     The DSS has held a lease over their footprint since 1953 after leasing the jetty from a local family. They completed a lease for the surrounding foreshore from the City of Hobart in 1964 which is a 99 year lease.

4.2.1.     New Clubhouses were built on the site in 1965 following the lease of land from the City of Hobart.

4.2.2.     A planning permit granted for the extension of the DSS Marina in 2013 was issued that required the Club to provide 146 parking spaces as part of the permit. It is noted that all these spaces are contained within the current lease footprint.

4.3.     The adjacent land of interest to the DSS is recognised as public land and zoned recreation and is used as a parking area, though is currently not line marked, meaning that parking is unregulated. Indications are that once line marked, 37 car parking spaces can be formalised.

4.3.1.     The surface of the car park is currently in poor condition and it is proposed to undertake remediation works along with the line marking.

4.4.     The DSS claims the area is also being used as a storage for vans, trailer storage, accommodation sites, unregistered vehicles, bus storage and university parking which to date has been largely unregulated.

4.5.     Site visits have confirmed vehicles parked on the site, some in situ for a number of years and parking that is haphazard and causing issues for the movement of vehicles in and out of the site.

4.6.     It was noted the majority of vehicles on the site had University of Tasmania parking permits stickers on the front of the vehicles. Other parking areas around Marieville Esplanade are limited, and what is available is largely fully utilised during weekdays.

4.7.     The DSS has indicated that if the lease was approved they would accommodate some users within the car park, particularly the neighbouring residents. However it appears that many of the daily users include the wider Community who would need to seek alternative parking.

4.8.     The valuation of the proposed lease area has been assessed at $14,000 (exc. GST) per annum.

4.9.     The report recommends the request for a lease over this land be refused, as the area is deemed public land and is currently well utilised by the community (though site improvement works are required).

4.10.   It is further proposed that a masterplan for the Marieville Esplanade be completed during the 2019-20 financial year and consideration as to the future of this parcel of the land be considered as part of the plan. One option for the site could be to look at longer term metered parking such has been introduced on the Queens Domain whereby the income generated is retained and reinvested on infrastructure in that area.

5.         Proposal and Implementation

5.1.     It is proposed that the request by the DSS to extend its lease footprint be refused.

5.2.     It is proposed the future of the land in question be further considered as a part of the development of the masterplan for the Marieville Esplanade area which is due to be undertaken in the 2019-20 financial year.

5.3.     The City is to undertake surface improvement works, including car park line marking to better formalise the long existing use of the site as local area parking.

6.         Strategic Planning and Policy Considerations

6.1.     The Capital City Strategic Plan 2015-2025 supports the proposal with Strategic Objective 4.1.4:

Facilitate and support local community groups to enhance community programs and reduce social isolation.

7.         Financial Implications

7.1.     Funding Source and Impact on Current Year Operating Result

7.1.1.     There would be no impact on the current years’ budget as a result of this proposal.

7.2.     Impact on Future Years’ Financial Result

7.2.1.     Maintenance funding is available to undertake surface improvement works.

7.3.     Asset Related Implications

7.3.1.     Surface improvement works will be undertaken, including car park line marking to better formalise the long existing use of the site as local area parking.

8.         Legal, Risk and Legislative Considerations

8.1.     Were the Council to offer a lease over the public land there would be requirements under the Local Government Act 1993, Section 178 that would require public consultation, which would require, as a minimum:

8.1.1.     Publish the intention to lease the land on at least 2 separate occasions in The Mercury.

8.1.2.     Display a copy of the notice of the intention to lease the land on all boundaries that abut a highway.

8.1.3.     Notification to the public that objection to the proposed lease, may be made to the General Manager within 21 days of the first publication.

8.2.     Should any objections be received, a further report would then be required to be considered by the Council taking into account objections received.

8.3.     Due to the considerable public interest in the land the Council may also choose to expand any community consultation to include a ‘Your Say’ page and notification to nearby property owners or managers.

9.         Social and Customer Considerations

9.1.     The DSS has broad community participation and has been a long term tenant of the area.

9.2.     It is however considered that the land is question is currently well utilised by the public, and therefore leasing the site to the DSS does not provide public value

10.      Community and Stakeholder Engagement

10.1.   The development of the masterplan, scheduled for 2019-2020 will be subject to community engagement.

11.      Delegation

11.1.   The matter is delegated to the Council.

 

As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.

 

Shannon Avery

Program Leader Recreation and Projects

Lee Farnhill

Manager Parks and Recreation

Glenn Doyle

Director City Amenity

 

 

Date:                            3 May 2019

File Reference:          F19/1576; R0669

 

 

 


Item No. 6.5

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 70

 

9/5/2019

 

 

6.5    Marieville Esplanade Reserve, Sandy Bay - Request to Install a Memorial Plaque

          File Ref: F19/38152

Report of the Program Leader Parks and Reserves, the Manager Parks and Recreation and the Director City Amenity of 3 May 2019 and attachments.

Delegation:     Committee


Item No. 6.5

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 71

 

9/5/2019

 

 

REPORT TITLE:                  Marieville Esplanade Reserve, Sandy Bay - Request to Install a Memorial Plaque

REPORT PROVIDED BY:  Program Leader Parks and Reserves

Manager Parks and Recreation

Director City Amenity

 

1.         Report Purpose and Community Benefit

1.1.     The purpose of this report is to seek approval for the installation of a memorial plaque at the Marieville Esplanade Reserve.

1.2.     The request is from Christina Venettacci as a memorial to her Grandmother Consiglia ‘Lilia’ Ambrosino

2.         Report Summary

2.1.     A request has been received from Christina Venettacci to install a memorial plaque in memory of her late Grandmother Consiglia ‘Lilia’ Ambrosino.

2.2.     Mrs Ambrosino was an honourable and upstanding resident, known to many within the Italian community and beyond (ref. Archbishop Doyle)

2.3.     Mrs Ambrosino lived on King Street for 54 years and spent most of her time at Marieville Esplanade walking with her dog with family celebrations also always held there.

3.         Recommendation

That:

1.      Approval be granted for the installation of a memorial plaque on a seat at Marieville Esplanade Reserve, Sandy Bay in memory of Consiglia ‘Lilia’ Ambrosino.

2.      The plaque be installed on an existing seat at Marieville Esplanade Reserve, with all costs for production and installation of the plaque to be met by the applicant.

3.      In accordance with the Council’s policy, the Director City Amenity determine the location of the plaque within Marieville Esplanade Reserve.

 

4.         Background

4.1.     A request has been received to install a memorial plaque on a seat at Marieville Esplanade Reserve, Sandy Bay (refer Attachment A).

4.2.     The request is from Christina Venettacci as a memorial to her Grandmother Consiglia ‘Lilia’ Ambrosino.

4.3.     Mrs Ambrosino was an honourable and upstanding resident, known to many within the Italian community and beyond (ref. Archbishop Doyle)

4.4.     Mrs Ambrosino lived on King Street for 54 years and spent most of her time at Marieville Esplanade walking with her dog with family celebrations also always held there.

4.5.     The request meets the criteria of the City’s Policy ‘Donation of Park Furniture and Equipment, Memorial Plaques and Tree Planting in Parks, Bushland and Reserves’, specifically:

4.5.1.     Clause 3(1)(ii) states:

Plaques be only installed to commemorate historically important national or state events, or people who have made a significant contribution to the social, political and cultural life of Hobart subject to the approval of the Parks and Recreation Committee.

The request is deemed to meet this criteria.

4.5.2.     Clause 3(1)(v) states:

The application for a plaque be supported by a minimum of three third parties, one of which must be a local community group.

The request includes endorsement from the The Holy Spirit Church (Father Brian Nichols), Emeritus Archbishop Doyle and Antonietta Venettacci (refer Attachments B, C and D).

5.         Proposal and Implementation

5.1.     Following approval, a location for the plaque (on an existing seat) will be decided in consultation with Christina Venettacci and approved by the Director City Amenity.

5.2.     The family will organise and supply the plaque and meet all expenses in relation to the supply and installation of the plaque.

5.3.     The Plaques will be installed by the City.

5.4.     After installation, the plaque contact details will be added to the plaque register for future reference.

6.         Strategic Planning and Policy Considerations

6.1.     The proposed installation of a plaque is within guidelines of the Council policy titled ‘Donation of Park Furniture and Equipment, Memorial Plaques and Tree Planting in Parks, Bushland and Reserves’ (refer Attachment E).

6.2.     The location of the plaque will not affect any management plans, park values or needs of park users.

6.3.     In accordance with the Council Policy, the City will maintain the plaque for a minimum of 10 years.

7.         Financial Implications

7.1.     Funding Source and Impact on Current Year Operating Result

7.1.1.     All costs of the plaque and installation will be met by the family.

7.2.     Impact on Future Years’ Financial Result

7.2.1.     Ongoing maintenance costs will be negligible.

7.3.     Asset Related Implications

7.3.1.     The plaque will be attached to an existing park bench for a minimum of 10 years.

8.         Delegation

8.1.     This matter is delegated to the Committee.

 

As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.

 

Peter Kerstan

Peter Kerstan

Program Leader Parks and Reserves

Lee Farnhill

Lee Farnhill

Manager Parks and Recreation

Glenn Doyle

Glenn Doyle

Director City Amenity

 

 

Date:                            3 May 2019

File Reference:          F19/38152

 

 

Attachment a:             Application to Install Memorial Plaque - Consiglia Ambrosino

Attachment b:             Letter of Support - Fr Brian Nichols (Supporting information)  

Attachment c:            Support from Archbishop Adrian Doyle - Plaque Request Ambrosino

Attachment d:            Letter of Support - Antonietta Venettacci (Supporting information)  

Attachment e:             Donation of Park Furniture and Equipment, Memorial Plaques and Tree Planting in Parks, Bushland and Reserves

Attachment f:             Proposed Location of Plaque   


Item No. 6.5

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting - 9/5/2019

Page 74

ATTACHMENT a

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Item No. 6.5

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting - 9/5/2019

Page 80

ATTACHMENT c

 

PDF Creator


Item No. 6.5

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting - 9/5/2019

Page 81

ATTACHMENT e

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Item No. 6.5

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting - 9/5/2019

Page 83

ATTACHMENT f

 

PDF Creator


Item No. 6.6

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 84

 

9/5/2019

 

 

6.6    Royal Tasmanian Botanical Garden - Annual Grant - 2018/2019

          File Ref: F19/43124

Report of the Manager Bushland and the Director City Amenity of 3 May 2019 and attachment.

Delegation:     Council


Item No. 6.6

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 85

 

9/5/2019

 

 

REPORT TITLE:                  Royal Tasmanian Botanical Garden - Annual Grant - 2018/2019

REPORT PROVIDED BY:  Manager Bushland

Director City Amenity

 

1.         Report Purpose and Community Benefit

1.1.     This report seeks approval for the payment of the annual grant to the Royal Tasmanian Botanical Gardens (RTBG) for the 2018/2019 financial year.

2.         Report Summary

2.1.     In 2016/2017, a contribution of $33,000 (exc gst) to assist in three projects and related works in support and in preparation of the Gardens’ bicentennial program was provided.

2.2.     In 2017/2018 a contribution of $29,000 (exc gst) to assist in three projects and related works as part of the second half of the bicentenary and ongoing visitor improvements, was provided (refer Attachment A for a summary of the implementation of these projects).

2.3.     In 2018/19 the RTBG is seeking $20,000 to assist in three projects, as detailed in Attachment A to the report, being:

2.3.1.     $6,000 towards the development of a new entrance to the Tasmanian Plant Collection.

2.3.2.     $7,000 towards the expansion of a new cool storage facility with the Tasmanian Seed Conservation Centre.

2.3.3.     $7,000 to support new landscaping works to the entrance area to the multipurpose POD facility (its recently refurbished meeting, workshop and community event venue).

3.         Recommendation

That:

1.      The Council provide an annual grant of $20,000 to the Royal Tasmanian Botanical Gardens (RTBG) funded from the Parks and City Amenity Divisional and the Bushland and Reserves Management Budget Functions within the 2018/2019 Annual Plan.

2.      The RTBG acknowledge the City’s contribution in relevant promotional material.

3.      The grant be recorded in the ‘Grants, Assistance and Benefits Provided’ section of the City of Hobart’s Annual Report.

 

 

4.         Background

4.1.     The RTBG cover an area of approximately 34.6 acres and was established in 1818 and hold historic plant collections and a large number of significant trees, many dating back to the nineteenth century.

4.2.     The Gardens attracted over 500,000 visitors in 2018.

4.3.     The RTBG plays an important role in the life and wellbeing of the City through the promotion of a range of community events and education programs and as an iconic destination within the City.

4.4.     The City has paid an annual grant to the Royal Tasmanian Botanical Gardens for many years with the grant usually indexed by CPI annually.

4.5.     In accordance with previous years, the grant is usually paid in the last quarter of the financial year.

2016/2017 Grant Funding

4.6.     In 2016/2017, the City provided grant funding of $33,000 (exc gst) to support three projects:

4.6.1.     $12,000 to assist in achieving significant enhancement of living collections with a focus on enhanced floral displays.

4.6.2.     $15,000 to undertake major upgrade to essential visitor amenities (mainly the public toilets).

4.6.3.     $6,000 to assist with the Bicentenary Program including installation of a ‘200’ feature piece within the Gardens for the duration of the year and related aspects of the program.

2017/2018 Grant Funding Request

4.7.     With the Gardens entering the second half of its bicentenary, further visitor improvements were implemented with the City contributing $29,000, as itemised below (a summary of the implementation of the project is provided in Attachment A).

4.7.1.     $12,000 - To undertake new wayfinding signage throughout the Gardens.

4.7.2.     $6,000 - Towards major additions and improvements within the central heritage core of the gardens were carried out during winter 2018 in preparation for the Spring and Summer period.

4.7.3.     $11,000 – Towards construction of a new tour buggy storage unit for three buggies that are used to provide transport around the gardens for visitors with limited mobility.

2018/2019 Grant Funding Request

4.8.     In 2018/2019, the Gardens are seeking $20,000 to assist in three projects, as detailed in Attachment A to the report, being:

4.8.1.     $6,000 towards the development of a new entrance to the Tasmanian Plant Collection.

4.8.2.     $7,000 towards the expansion of a new cool storage facility for the Tasmanian Seed Conservation Centre.

4.8.3.     $7,000 to support new landscaping works to the entrance area to the multipurpose POD facility (its recently refurbished meeting, workshop and community event venue).

5.         Proposal and Implementation

5.1.     It is proposed that the City provide $20,000 (exc gst), to the RTBG as part of its annual grant for 2018/2019.

5.1.1.     Being $13,000 (exc gst) as part of the City’s annual committed grant for 2018/2019; and

5.1.2.     $7,000 (exc gst) being an additional one-off grant contribution

6.         Strategic Planning and Policy Considerations

6.1.     The provision of the grant is consistent with the City’s Capital City Strategic Plan 2015-2025 Strategic Plan, specifically:

Strategic Objective 1.4 – An enriched visitor experience

Strategic Objective 2.4 – Unique heritage assets are protected and celebrated

Strategic Objective 3.3 – A highly valued natural and cultural open space network

6.2.     The application accords with a number of collaborative initiatives as outlined in the City’s memorandum of understanding with the RTBG.

7.         Financial Implications

7.1.     Funding Source and Impact on Current Year Operating Result

7.1.1.     A funding allocation of $13,000 (exc gst) for the annual committed grant remains available in the Parks and City Amenity Divisional Budget Function (160) within the 2018/2019 Annual Plan.

7.1.2.     The additional contribution of $7,000 be funded from underspent expenditure within the Bushland and Reserves Management budget functions in the 2018/2019 Annual Plan.

8.         Marketing and Media

8.1.     The grant is subject to the RTBG acknowledging the City’s contribution in relevant promotional material.

8.2.     The grant provision is to be recorded in the ‘Grants, Assistance and Benefits Provided’ section of the City of Hobart’s Annual Report.

9.         Community and Stakeholder Engagement

9.1.     The Gardens are an important part of the fabric of the City and the southern Tasmanian region and is visited and utilised by local, intrastate, interstate and international visitors alike.

10.      Delegation

10.1.   The matter is delegated to the Council.

 

As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.

 

John Fisher

Manager Bushland

Glenn Doyle

Director City Amenity

 

Date:                            3 May 2019

File Reference:          F19/43124

 

 

Attachment a:             RTBG Grant Submission   


Item No. 6.6

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting - 9/5/2019

Page 89

ATTACHMENT a

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Item No. 6.7

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 96

 

9/5/2019

 

 

6.7    Swan Street Park, North Hobart - Concept Plan of Proposed Refurbishment - Results of Community Engagement

          File Ref: F19/43387

Report of the Parks Projects Officer, the Program Leader Recreation and Projects, the Manager Parks and Recreation and the Director City Amenity of 3 May 2019 and attachment.

Delegation:     Council


Item No. 6.7

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 97

 

9/5/2019

 

 

REPORT TITLE:                  Swan Street Park, North Hobart - Concept Plan of Proposed Refurbishment - Results of Community Engagement

REPORT PROVIDED BY:  Parks Projects Officer

Program Leader Recreation and Projects

Manager Parks and Recreation

Director City Amenity

 

1.         Report Purpose and Community Benefit

1.1.     The purpose of this report is to consider feedback from the community engagement associated with the proposed refurbishment of the Swan Street Park, North Hobart and to seek approval of the revised refurbishment plan to enable detailed planning and construction to proceed.

2.         Report Summary

2.1.     The Swan Street Park is a small area of open space located on the corner of Elizabeth and Swan Streets, North Hobart.

2.2.     Community engagement was undertaken on the concept plan, endorsed by Council on 18 December 2018. 

2.3.     A revised plan has subsequently been developed (refer Attachment A) based on the feedback received during the community engagement period.

A cost estimate of the revised design has been identified as $375,000, being $55,000 more than the $320,000 allocated within the 2019/2020 Capital Works budget to upgrade the park.

Funding of the additional $55,000 will subsequently be provided from the 2019/2020 asset renewal budget.

3.         Recommendation

That:

1.      The Council approve the revised refurbishment plan for Swan Street Park, North Hobart, marked as Attachment A to the report, to enable detailed planning and construction to proceed.

2.      Funding of an estimated $375,000 be provided as follows:

(i)      $320,000 from the existing allocation within the 2019/2020 Capital Works Program.

(ii)     $55,000 from the 2019/2020 asset renewal budget.

3.      The General Manager be authorised to secure all necessary statutory approvals for the works, proceed with the upgrade and finalise lease arrangements with the landowner.

4.         Background

4.1.     The Swan Street Park is located on the corner of Elizabeth and Swan Streets, North Hobart, opposite the North Hobart Post Office.

4.2.     The land is owned by the Uniting Church of Australia under lease to the City until 2020.

4.2.1.     The Council has approved the extension of the lease for a further fifteen (15) years, but at this stage the Uniting Church has not signed the deed of variation.

4.3.     Two key stakeholder groups were actively engaged in the development of the initial concept plan:

4.3.1.     The Uniting Church of Australia (land owners of the park); and

4.3.2.     The North Hobart Traders Association.

Artist Impression – Initial Concept Plan

4.4.     The Council, at its meeting held on 17 December 2018, endorsed the concept plans to allow for wider community engagement to be undertaken, including consultation with young people.

4.5.     Community engagement was undertaken over a four week period during February/March 2019 that included the use and promotion of the City’s Your Say Hobart online portal, social media promotion, onsite signage, correspondence notification to local residences and businesses and two onsite listening posts.

A meeting was held with the land owner, the North Hobart Uniting Church and the North Hobart Traders Association (who also placed the concept plans on their website).

4.6.     In total the Your Say page received 879 visits with 92 submissions received.

Feedback Summary

Trees and planting

The majority of respondents suggested more trees and planting in the park and for the space to reflect a quiet green landscaped retreat

Playground equipment

Almost half of all respondents indicated a desire to see some play elements for children at the park which the initial design did not have.

Park Priorities

The survey revealed that community priorities had not been reflected in the initial concept design. 

More landscaped green space and a playground area were identified as important elements for the park. 

A large percentage of respondents (45.3%) had questions or concerns about the park and a further 35.8% did not support the original design.


 

5.         Proposal and Implementation

5.1.     Based on the feedback received from the community consultation process, the initial concept plan has been revised with the following changes (Refer Attachment A)

5.1.1.     Additional seating and green spaces to cater for a variety of user opportunities.

5.1.2.     Space has been reconfigured to cater for smaller groups by creating more intimate and independent spaces.

5.1.3.     Addition of a small fenced playground.

5.1.4.     Changed from an open plan plaza feel to a filled, activated space that the community can play, meet and enjoy daily.


Artist Impression – Revised Plan

5.2.     It is proposed that the Council approve the revised refurbishment plan for the Park to enable detailed planning and construction to proceed.


 

6.         Strategic Planning and Policy Considerations

6.1.     The proposal aligns with the Capital City Strategic Plan 2015- 2025:

Strategic Objective 2.2

A people focussed city with well-designed and well managed urban and recreational spaces

Action 2.2.2.:  Develop and, manage and maintain the city’s urban spaces and infrastructure.

Strategic Objective 3.3

A highly valued natural and cultural open space network.

Action 3.3.2:  Implement park-based management and master plans.

Strategic Objective 5.4

An engaged civic culture where people feel part of the decision making.

Action 5.4.1:  Implement best practice community engagement across the organisation.

7.         Financial Implications

7.1.     Funding Source and Impact on Current Year Operating Result

7.1.1.     The revised plan has an estimated cost of $375,000 with works proposed to be undertaken during 2019/20

7.2.     Impact on Future Years’ Financial Result

7.2.1.     Funding of $320,000 is allocated in the 2019/2020 Capital Works Program.

7.2.2.     Funding of the additional $55,000 will subsequently be provided from the 2019/2020 asset renewal budget.

7.2.3.     The current maintenance budget for the site of approximately $6,000 per annum is anticipated to cover the ongoing annual maintenance of the refurbished site.

7.3.     Asset Related Implications

7.3.1.     The City’s improvement to the site would commence upon the deed of variation to the City’s lease from the Church being finalised.

8.         Legal, Risk and Legislative Considerations

8.1.     The City is awaiting a Deed of Variation from the Church, as landlord, extending the City’s lease over the site.

9.         Social and Customer Considerations

9.1.     Improved park facilities proposed will complement the area and provide the local community and visitors with a functional, accessible public open space.

10.      Marketing and Media

10.1.   At the appropriate time, promotion of the refurbishment will be undertaken.

11.      Community and Stakeholder Engagement

11.1.   Significant community engagement has occurred for this project.

12.      Delegation

12.1.   The matter is delegated to the Council.

 

As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.

 

Kellie Williams

Parks Projects Officer

Shannon Avery

Program Leader Recreation and Projects

Lee Farnhill

Manager Parks and Recreation

Glenn Doyle

Director City Amenity

 

Date:                            3 May 2019

File Reference:          F19/43387

 

 

Attachment a:             Swan Street Park - Revised Refurbishment Plan   


Item No. 6.7

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting - 9/5/2019

Page 103

ATTACHMENT a

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Item No. 6.8

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 106

 

9/5/2019

 

 

6.8    Non-Chemical Treatment in Weed Control Within Urban Streetscapes - Trial Outcome

          File Ref: F19/30097

Report of the Parks and Reserves Program Officer, the Program Leader Recreation and Projects, the Manager Parks and Recreation and the Director City Amenity of 3 May 2019.

Delegation:     Council


Item No. 6.8

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 107

 

9/5/2019

 

 

REPORT TITLE:                  Non-Chemical Treatment in Weed Control Within Urban Streetscapes - Trial Outcome

REPORT PROVIDED BY:  Parks and Reserves Program Officer

Program Leader Parks and Reserves

Manager Parks and Recreation

Director City Amenity

 

1.         Report Purpose and Community Benefit

1.1.     The City has undertaken a trial of non-chemical weed management solutions to help manage weed infestations in the City’s urban streetscapes.

1.2.     This report outlines the results of the street trial. 

2.         Report Summary

2.1.     A trial has been conducted to identify and analyse alternatives to the chemical spraying of weeds, within a street environment. Contractors were engaged to trial the use of steam to control weeds within a street environment to determine the functional effectiveness and costs of such technology.

2.2.     The trial was undertaken over a three month period and covered a total distance of 3,340m across three suburbs in Hobart, with steam treatment applied to one side of the street and the standard herbicide treatment applied to the other.

2.3.     The results of the trial indicate that only with multiple, repeated applications is steam treatment effective, however, herbicide treatment required only one application over the trial period.

2.4.     The results show that steam treatment could work, however across the whole city street network would involve a substantial increased cost.

2.5.     Based on the findings of the trial, it is recommended that the City continue the use of its current herbicide treatment, complimented by further investigations into alternate methods as they are developed.

 

3.         Recommendation

That:

1.      The City continue the use of approved herbicides to manage weeds within the municipal area until more efficient and cost-effective non-chemical solutions are available.

2.      Monitoring and assessment of use of new weed treatment methods be undertaken as such treatments become available.

3.      The City continue to promote the No Spray Register for residents who want to self-manage any incidents of weeds outside their properties using non-chemical methods (typically manual removal).

 

 

4.         Background

4.1.     The City currently undertakes targeted weed control operations across city streets with the exception of the suburbs of Fern Tree and Ridgeway. The Management Regulations include the application of herbicide on quarterly cycles which are based on the life cycle of weeds and are aimed at preventing the spread of seeds.

4.2.     The weed control program has a number of key outcomes:

4.2.1.     Removes weeds which may damage roads and footpaths.

4.2.2.     Limits the spread of declared weeds.

4.2.3.     Minimises the accumulation of litter and debris in gutters and on footpaths.

4.2.4.     Helps maintain pedestrian safety.

4.2.5.     Maintains the clean and appealing look of the City streets for both residents and visitors.

4.3.     The weed control program utilises an approved herbicide (Roundup Biactive®), an aquatic friendly herbicide which is non-residual and is inactivated immediately in the soil.  This herbicide contains Glyphosate.

4.3.1.     All regulatory requirements in the storage, handling and use of Glyphosate are strictly followed.

4.4.     Given concerns expressed regarding the usage of Glyphosate investigations have been undertaken in the possible use of alternative non-chemical methods of weed control.

4.5.     A trial using steam and other non-chemical methods to assess the effectiveness and the financial viability of alternative weed treatments was undertaken.

4.6.     A section of paved area was treated with steam over a 3 month period and compared to an adjoining area (with similar environmental conditions) treated using a herbicide spray (Roundup Biactive®).

4.6.1.     A total distance of 3340m of City streets were covered by the trial. 1670m of steam treatment and 1670m of herbicide treatment.

4.6.2.     In the designated trial areas, one side of the street was treated with herbicide, while the other side was treated with steam.

4.7.     The trial was conducted in three suburbs within Hobart.

4.8.     Data was recorded throughout the trials and includes weather conditions, dates, times and progressive photographs of each treated area.

4.9.     The trial commenced in October 2018 and progressed through to December 2018; this is a period of typically vigorous weed growth.

4.9.1.     The areas were initially treated on 11 October 2018. The areas were then inspected periodically, with steam requiring reapplication on 28 November 2018 and 18 December 2018. Additional spraying of herbicide was not warranted as no weed growth had reappeared after the initial application on 11 October 2018.

4.9.2.     The below chart outlines the estimated costs for both treatment methods, noting that steam treatment is charged at an hourly rate and time required would vary from season to season. The below figures are best estimates based on the trial.

 

Herbicide

Steam

Per City-wide Application

$28,500

$190,000

Annual applications

4

Up to 9

Total Annual cost (ex GST)

$114,000

$1,710,000


 

4.10.   Photos taken from the trials also demonstrate the levels of effectiveness of the two application methods over time:


Carlton Street – 22 October 2018 – right-side of tree herbicide, left-side steam treatment.

    
Newdegate St – Left pic 9th Oct Pre steam, right pic 24th Oct Post steam treatment showing broadleaf weeds still alive

4.11.   A complimentary trial was also undertaken at the Hobart Regional Nursery.  Acetic acid (Contact Organics LocalSafe™ Weed Terminator) was used with success on soft small weeds, however, larger perennial woody weeds demonstrated resistance.

            Nursery - PreTrial - 3-1-19   Nursery - PostTrial - 16-1-19
Nursey acetic acid trial: pre-application on left, post-application on right.

4.12.   In respect to the City’s playgrounds, chemical spraying of weeds is rarely required, with most treatments undertaken mechanically. Should spraying be required, the playground area is closed for a period with appropriate temporary signage installed.

5.         Proposal and Implementation

5.1.     The trials indicate that from an operational and economic perspective the City should continue with the current targeted herbicide treatment of weeds on city-wide roads and footpaths.

5.1.1.     The trials indicate that steam treatment requires additional, multiple applications to be effective and the steam initially promotes germination of seeds already in the soil, causing further additional weed growth.

5.1.2.     It is estimated up to 9 steam applications would be required annually to adequately treat weeds. The trials indicate that even at the lower end of estimations the costs of steam treatment would be considerable.

5.2.     However, the trials did indicate some success with steam application and acetic acid trials on annual weeds, albeit more labour intensive and at more cost (broad-leaf weeds ie thistles regrew after initial treatment). New technologies in weed control will be monitored and considered if there are any circumstances and areas where steam treatment and acetic acid treatment might be effective and viable in our ongoing efforts to minimise the usage of herbicides wherever possible whilst strictly complying to all WHS requirements.

6.         Financial Implications

6.1.     This report proposes no change in current operating procedures and as such there are no funding implications.

6.1.1.     The trial did include an increased cost for the steam application but this will be absorbed in the current weed control budget.

6.2.     Per above, there will be no impact on Future Years’ Financial Result.

6.2.1.     However, if the City chose to utilise steam treatment across all city streets there would be significant financial implications. Last year’s annual herbicide contract equalled $114,000 (ex GST), which covered 4 applications across the year. The comparative for steam treatment for all City streets and footpaths is estimated to be $1,710,000 (ex GST).

7.         Legal, Risk and Legislative Considerations

7.1.     The City of Hobart’s current spraying contract has comprehensive and strict specifications for the use of chemicals.

In addition, the City of Hobart and all contractors adhere to the appropriate codes of practice as set out by the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (DPIPWE).

7.2.     The City’s No Spray Register is also established and monitored in accordance with The DPIPWE Code of Practice for Spraying in Public Places.

8.         Environmental Considerations

8.1.     Any method of weed control has side effects.  Steam, organically certified herbicides (acetic acid based), chemical herbicides and manual removal all impact the environment.  It is the responsibility of the City to ensure best practice is achieved and maintained for the benefit of the Greater Hobart area.

8.2.     Steam Application

8.2.1.     Due to the heat of steam application, overtime the consistent use of steam treatment has detrimental effects on the soil microbiology of treated areas.

8.3.     Chemical Treatment

8.3.1.     The choice of Roundup Biactive® is based on the specific formulation for use in environmentally sensitive areas and contains an ‘aquatic approved’ surfactant. 

The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) current assessment is that products containing glyphosate are safe to use as per the label instructions. 

There are a number of other herbicides available, however they have a higher classification on the Federal Poison Register, Roundup Biactive is Schedule 5 Caution, Schedule 10 being the highest level. https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00032/Html/Text#_Toc532805036   

9.         Social and Customer Considerations

9.1.     Now a preference to not have chemicals sprayed in front of their properties is available. Residents who do not want their street frontage sprayed can opt to go on a No Spray Register and manage weeds themselves.

9.1.1.     The City of Hobart website lists alternative weed control methods available for residents to further support and promote the program.


 

10.      Delegation

10.1.   This matter is delegated to the Council.

 

As signatory to this report, I certify that, pursuant to Section 55(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, I hold no interest, as referred to in Section 49 of the Local Government Act 1993, in matters contained in this report.

 

Heather Huxley

Parks and Reserves Program Officer

Peter Kerstan

Program Leader Parks and Reserves

Lee Farnhill

Manager Parks and Recreation

Glenn Doyle

Director City Amenity

 

Date:                            3 May 2019

File Reference:          F19/30097

 

 

   


Item No. 7.1

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 114

 

9/5/2019

 

 

7.       Motions of which Notice has been Given

 

7.1      Trans and Gender-Diverse Posters in Public Convenience Facilities

            File Ref: F19/51117

 

Councillor Ewin

 

Motion:

“That the City of Hobart promote its Community Safety Commitment to community inclusion through the display of trans and gender-diverse posters in the City’s public convenience facilities, as part of its current public facilities safety information program, with the wording and content of the posters being developed in collaboration with relevant organisations (such as Working It Out and Transforming Tasmania).”

 

Rationale:

 

“Trans and gender-diverse people are the targets of significant discrimination in their day-to-day lives which is one of the reasons they have been identified as a priority population in the City of Hobart’s Community Safety Commitment.  This ongoing discrimination, harassment, and at times violence, contributes to continued social exclusion, stigmatisation and negative mental health outcomes. You can access some horrifying statistics on LGBTI mental health here; most of which are directly linked to social exclusion and stigmatisation.

 

It is timely for Hobart City to show support and solidarity with the queer community given the levels of gendered vitriol prevalent in public discourse, sparked by the recent debate around birth certificates and forced divorce in State Parliament.

 

In line with our commitment to our Community Vision values of inclusivity, accessibility and celebrating diversity, installing such signs will contribute to the safety and sense of belonging of some of the most marginalised people in our community.”

 

 

The General Manager reports:

 

“In line with the Council’s policy in relation to Notices of Motion, I advise that the matter is considered to be within the jurisdiction of the Hobart City Council as the proposal aligns with the City of Hobart’s Community Safety Commitment and the public facilities safety information program.”

 

 

   


Item No. 8.1

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 115

 

9/5/2019

 

 

8.       Committee Action Status Report

 

8.1      Committee Actions - Status Report

A report indicating the status of current decisions is attached for the information of Elected Members.

REcommendation

That the information be received and noted.

Delegation:      Committee

 

 

Attachment a:             Committee Status Report    


Item No. 8.1

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting - 9/5/2019

Page 116

ATTACHMENT a

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator

  


 

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 149

 

9/5/2019

 

 

9.       Questions Without Notice

Section 29 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015.

File Ref: 13-1-10

 

An Elected Member may ask a question without notice of the Chairman, another Elected Member, the General Manager or the General Manager’s representative, in line with the following procedures:

1.         The Chairman will refuse to accept a question without notice if it does not relate to the Terms of Reference of the Council committee at which it is asked.

2.         In putting a question without notice, an Elected Member must not:

(i)    offer an argument or opinion; or

(ii)   draw any inferences or make any imputations – except so far as may be necessary to explain the question.

3.         The Chairman must not permit any debate of a question without notice or its answer.

4.         The Chairman, Elected Member, General Manager or General Manager’s representative who is asked a question may decline to answer the question, if in the opinion of the respondent it is considered inappropriate due to its being unclear, insulting or improper.

5.         The Chairman may require a question to be put in writing.

6.         Where a question without notice is asked and answered at a meeting, both the question and the response will be recorded in the minutes of that meeting.

7.         Where a response is not able to be provided at the meeting, the question will be taken on notice and

(i)    the minutes of the meeting at which the question is asked will record the question and the fact that it has been taken on notice.

(ii)   a written response will be provided to all Elected Members, at the appropriate time.

(iii)  upon the answer to the question being circulated to Elected Members, both the question and the answer will be listed on the agenda for the next available ordinary meeting of the committee at which it was asked, where it will be listed for noting purposes only.

 


 

Agenda (Open Portion)

Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting

Page 150

 

9/5/2019

 

 

10.     Closed Portion Of The Meeting

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That the Committee resolve by majority that the meeting be closed to the public pursuant to regulation 15(1) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015 because the items included on the closed agenda contain the following matters:  

 

·         Information of a commercial and confidential nature.

 

The following items are listed for discussion:-

 

Item No. 1          Minutes of the last meeting of the Closed Portion of the Committee Meeting

Item No. 2          Consideration of supplementary items to the agenda

Item No. 3          Indications of pecuniary and conflicts of interest

Item No. 4          Committee Action Status Report

Item No. 4.1       Committee Actions - Status Report

LG(MP)R 15(2)(c)(i), (d) and  (f)

Item No. 5          Questions Without Notice